Skip to content

· Private foundation

Esse Health Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$328kEducation$38kHuman Services$33kRecreation & Sports$18kYouth Development$8kReligion$3kArts & Culture$2kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$61k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$5,000
MIDTOWN COMMUNITY SERVICES$5,000
CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH$5,000
UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY FOUNDATION$5,000
LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$5,000
MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS$2,500
LOYOLA ACADEMY$2,500
COLLEGE BOUND$2,500
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION$2,500
ST LOUIS JEWISH LIGHT$2,000
INDEPENDENCE CENTER$2,000
EVERTRUE$2,000
THE CHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION$2,000
NURSES FOR NEWBORNS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TROY DREAM CENTER: $3k → 10%LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES: $3k → 11%LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES: $3k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $5k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $3k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$400k · 22 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
11

Total granted

$400k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+12%

Still filing today

59%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +4%
  • LA
    LOYOLA ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS
    7× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +226%
  • MC
    MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS
    7× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • SL
    ST LOUIS HEALTH EQUIPMENT LENDING PROGRAM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +94%
  • CD
    CASA DE SALUDgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +41%
  • GC
    GREAT CIRCLE
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue -99%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Conquering Congenital Heart Disease

At conquering chd we exist to conquerin the most common birth defect. we engage, listen, learn, and act. we create visibility and empower all impacted by chd. we accomplish this through awareness, knowledge, community and research.

Health
4
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
7
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
8
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
9
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
10
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
11
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
12
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The National Children's Cancer Society; the most unlike its peers is Troy Dream Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTER FOR HEARING & SPEECH: $27,500 · OtherCENTER FOR HEARING & SPEECHASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATION: $27,500 · OtherASTHMA AND ALLERGY FOUNDATIONINDEPENDENCE CENTER: $20,500 · OtherINDEPENDENCE CENTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS: $20,000 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESSCROHN'S COLITIS FOUNDATION: $17,500 · OtherCROHN'S COLITIS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $17,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMIDTOWN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $17,000 · OtherMIDTOWN COMMUNITY SERVICESST LOUIS SENIOR OLYMPICS: $15,000 · OtherST LOUIS SENIOR OLYMPICSTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY: $15,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETYHEALTHWORKS: $10,000 · Other+10 more: $31,662 · Other+10 moreBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $45,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCAmerican Diabetes Association: $40,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes AssociationMEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS: $21,500 · HealthMEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONSAmerican Heart Association Inc: $15,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncADDICTION IS REAL INC: $12,500 · HealthADDICTION IS REAL INCINSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN FAMILY MEDICINE: $11,000 · HealthINSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN F…+5 more: $20,500 · Health+5 moreLOYOLA ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS: $35,000 · EducationNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $9,500 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES: $5,500 · Human ServicesTROY DREAM CENTER INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentA MILLION STARS INC DBA COLLEGE BOUND: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$219,162Health$165,500Education$35,000Human Services$18,000Youth Development$10,000Philanthropy$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS: $35,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR HEARING & SPEECH: $27,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetMEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS: $21,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetINDEPENDENCE CENTER: $20,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetADDICTION IS REAL INC: $12,500 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN FAMILY MEDICINE: $11,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $9,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS HEALTH EQUIPMENT LENDING PROGRAM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCASA DE SALUD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOYCE: $3,162 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTROY DREAM CENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE MIGHTY OAKES HEART FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHEALING ACTION NETWORK INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HEARING & SPEECH ↗
  • Who funds MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ADDICTION IS REAL INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN FAMILY MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds NURSES FOR NEWBORNS ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS HEALTH EQUIPMENT LENDING PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA DE SALUD ↗
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREAT CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds VOYCE ↗
  • Who funds TROY DREAM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MIGHTY OAKES HEART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALING ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds A MILLION STARS INC DBA COLLEGE BOUND ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS JEWISH LIGHT ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO29.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · St Louis Philanthropic Organization · Youthbridge Community Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Centene Foundation · The Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital · Pott Foundation · Bjc Health System Dba Bjc Healthcare · Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation · Tsf · Jefferson Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Esse Health Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Esse Health Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Esse Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph