Skip to content

· Private foundation

Esi Cares Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Youth Development$92kHealth$67kHuman Services$44kCommunity Improvement$31kCrime & Legal$25kFood & Nutrition$18kRecreation & Sports$14kArts & Culture$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $56k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$666k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IDAHO NONPROFIT CENTER$30,500
DRESS FOR SUCCESS BOISE VALLEY$25,000
WCA - WOMEN'S CHILDREN ALLIANCE$5,000
FOSTER AND HEART$5,000
GENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH$5,000
IDAHO FOOD BANK$3,500
FACES OF HOPE FOUNDATION$3,001
GIRAFFELAUGH$2,500
IDAHO YOUTH RANCH$2,500
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SW IDAHO$2,500
OPERATION AIR DROP$2,060
GIRL SCOUTS OF SILVER SAGE$1,500
MAKE A WISH$1,000
BOISE POLICE ASSOCIATION$500
HOMEDALE JT SCHOOL DISTRICT #370$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GIRAFFE LAUGH: $5k → 8%GIRAFFELAUGH: $4k → 8%GIRAFFE LAUGH: $3k → 8%GIRAFFELAUGH: $3k → 8%GIRAFFE LAUGH: $3k → 8%GIRAFFE LAUGH: $3k → 8%GIRAFFE LAUGH (ESI EMPLOYEE MATCH FOR SEASON OF GIVING): $250 → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $3k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $3k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MA
OR
PA
CA
UT
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$233k · 25 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
41

Total granted

$233k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+78%

Still filing today

52%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CulturePhilanthropyCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc
    2× · 2020–2023 · $34k · revenue +12%
  • IN
    IDAHO NONPROFIT CENTER INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $31k · revenue +17%
  • GL
    GIRAFFE LAUGH INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $19k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • BH
    BUILDING HOPE TODAY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +224%
  • BR
    BOISE RESCUE MISSION VIA SCENTSY ROCK-A-THON
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • CR
    CAMP RAINBOW GOLD VIA SCENTSY ROCK A THON
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Health Data Exchange Inc

IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.

Health
2
Idaho Technology Council Inc

To help technology companies in Idaho start, grow, and thrive.

—
3
Disability Rights Idaho Inc

The organization protects, promotes and advances the legal and human rights of individuals with disabilities, through quality legal, individual, and system advocacy.

—
4
Idaho Diabetes Youth Program

To enrich the lives of youth with diabetes

Youth Development
5
Idaho Technology Council Foundation

The corporation advances charitable and educational initiatives as an affiliate of the Idaho Technology Council. It promotes digiatl literacy technology education and workforce readiness across Idaho by funding and delivering…

Science & Tech
6
Idaho Community Foundation Inc

The idaho community foundation strengthens communities through philanthropy, elevating nonprofit impact, and connecting idahoans to create a place where everyone can contribute to thriving communities.

Philanthropy
7
Boise Metro Chamber of Commerce Inc

The boise metro chamber of commerce is the principal advocate for the business community dedicated to building prosperity in the region.

—
8
Idaho Diaper Bank Inc

Building stronger, healthier, families in idaho by providing access to basic hygiene to keep babies clean, dry, & happy.

Human Services
9
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
10
Idaho Primary Care Association Inc

Ipca supports community health centers in providing high-quality and affordable primary care to all idahoans through training and technical support. ipca keeps health centers current on issues and trends affecting the changing healthcare…

—
11
Idaho Immunization Coalition Inc

Mission: The Idaho Immunization Coalition is a vital assembly of statewide stakeholders dedicated to promoting health and preventing serious illness through immunization protection of all Idahoans. Vision: Cultivate and mobilize expertise,…

Health
12
Boise Farmers Market Inc

The Boise Farmers Market supports a regenerative, healthy food and agricultural system by operating a vibrant marketplace featuring locally grown and crafted products.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idaho Nonprofit Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foster and Heart. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $50,000 · OtherDRESS FOR SUCCESSIDAHO NONPROFIT CENTER INC: $31,000 · OtherIDAHO NONPROFIT CENTER INCDRESS FOR SUCCESS BOISE VALLEY: $25,000 · OtherDRESS FOR SUCCESS BOISE VALLEYWCA - WOMEN'S CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $10,000 · OtherFACES OF HOPE: $8,185 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SW ID INC: $8,001 · Other+55 more: $62,229 · Other+55 moreRonald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc: $34,000 · HealthRonald McDo…GIRAFFE LAUGH INC: $19,250 · Human ServicesGIRAFFE LA…IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $5,501 · Human ServicesIDAHO YOUT…FOSTER AND HEART: $5,000 · Human ServicesFOSTER AND…+2 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesBUILDING HOPE TODAY INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalGENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $16,000 · InternationalTHE DISCOVERY CENTER OF IDAHO INC: $9,577 · Arts & CultureIDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $12,375 · Food & Nutrition
Other$194,415Health$34,000Human Services$31,251Crime & Legal$25,000International$16,000Arts & Culture$12,577Food & Nutrition$12,375

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRonald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc: $34,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetIDAHO NONPROFIT CENTER INC: $31,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetBUILDING HOPE TODAY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetGIRAFFE LAUGH INC: $19,250 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $16,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $12,375 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DISCOVERY CENTER OF IDAHO INC: $9,577 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SW ID INC: $8,001 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $5,501 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIdaho Trails Association: $5,012 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFOSTER AND HEART: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCity of Good Inc: $3,522 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SILVER SAGE COUNCIL INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOISE POLICE ASSOCIATION: $2,100 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBOISE BICYCLE PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP RIVER RUN INC: $1,500 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $287 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $263 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO NONPROFIT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING HOPE TODAY INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRAFFE LAUGH INC ↗
  • Who funds GENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE DISCOVERY CENTER OF IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SW ID INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Idaho Trails Association ↗
  • Who funds FOSTER AND HEART ↗
  • Who funds City of Good Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SILVER SAGE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BOISE POLICE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BOISE BICYCLE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RIVER RUN INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation IncID30.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Bews Foundation · The Julius C Jeker Foundation Inc · Harad Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Esi Cares Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Esi Cares Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Esi Cares Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Esi Cares Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Esi Cares’ filings →

    More from the funding graph