Skip to content

Colorado · Private foundation

Esgar Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$131k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
Organizations funded FY2023
100%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2023
$131,050
Largest grant, FY2023
$131,050
Organizations funded a year
1 to 39
FY2021 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$2.5M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 100% of the organizations Esgar Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20231$131k100%
FY202139$139kn/a
68% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$76kReligion$19kHealth$14kFood & Nutrition$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kRecreation & Sports$3kArts & Culture$1kAnimals$1kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Food Bank for Larimer County$6,00010%
GraceLubbock Homeschool Group$5,000110%
Lamar Community College Foundation$4,53511%
Wiley United Methodist Church$3,8551n/a
Wesley Foundation at Texas Tech$3,50011%
Road Runners Club of America$3,00014%
Rist Canyon Volunteer Fire Department$2,00011%
Greater Europe Mission$1,5001n/a
Colorado State University$1,2001n/a
Reid Park Zoological Society$1,00010%

Plus 30 recipients with no EIN on record ($238k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Esgar Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Esgar Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Esgar Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Esgar Foundation

How much does Esgar Foundation give?
Esgar Foundation reported 1 grants totaling $131,050 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 39 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does Esgar Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2023, its largest causes are Education (8%), Religion (2%), Health (1%).
Who are Esgar Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2023: The Food Bank for Larimer County ($6k), GraceLubbock Homeschool Group ($5k), Lamar Community College Foundation ($5k).
Does Esgar Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Esgar Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Esgar Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Esgar Foundation based?
Esgar Foundation is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $264k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Esgar’s filings →

More from the funding graph