Skip to content

· Private foundation

ES3 Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$210k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$667kHealth$122kYouth Development$50kReligion$21kHuman Services$16kScience & Tech$13kArts & Culture$9kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
$2,560
Median grant
5
States reached
$561k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Dodgen Family$30,024
Lopez Family$26,727
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Rochester Institute of Technology$24,000
Columbia University$20,000
Individual grant recipient$13,824
Morgan County Jr Livetock Associati$13,000
Aerospace Heritage Foundation of Ut$12,700
St Mark Catholic Church$9,000
Individual grant recipient$7,662
Individual grant recipient$5,257
Individual grant recipient$2,585
Gail Halverson Aviation Educational$2,575
Individual grant recipient$2,560
Weber Junior Livestock Association$1,540
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Francis Parker Upper School: $3k → 11%Rochester Institute of Technology: $24k → 14%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $60k → 17%Morgan County Jr Livetock Associati: $13k → 4%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $5k → 8%Gail Halverson Aviation Educational: $3k → 8%GSA - GWINNET SOCCER: $1k → 9%Joshua Jenkins: $3k → 11%PEARLS OF VISION FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 13%Seton Hall University: $23k → 16%St Paul VI Catholic High School: $14k → 4%St Mark Catholic Church: $9k → 6%Francis Parker Upper School: $3k → 11%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $50k → 17%Morgan County Jr Livetock Associati: $12k → 4%Northridge High School: $2k → 6%Weber Junior Livestock Association: $2k → 9%WARNER ROBINS HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 11%Seton Hall University: $22k → 16%St Paul VI Catholic High School: $10k → 4%St Mark Catholic Church: $7k → 6%ROSSA MOTTA: $3k → 11%Columbia University: $50k → 17%Morgan County Jr Livetock Associati: $11k → 4%Aerospace Heritage Foundation of Ut: $13k → 9%Win Academy: $1k → 11%Seton Hall University: $19k → 16%St Paul VI Catholic High School: $9k → 4%St Mark Catholic Church: $5k → 6%SUSAN BARTON: $960 → 11%Columbia University: $50k → 17%Morgan County Jr Livetock Associati: $8k → 4%Syracuse High School Cheer: $2k → 6%Aerospaace Heritage Foundation of U: $3k → 9%Win Academy: $1k → 11%Columbia University: $50k → 17%Aerospaace Heritage Foundation of U: $3k → 9%Columbia University: $45k → 17%Aerospaace Heritage Foundation of U: $2k → 9%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $40k → 17%Aerospaace Heritage Foundation of U: $950 → 9%1915 Society: $25k → 17%1915 Society: $25k → 17%Columbia University: $20k → 17%THE SENIOR SOCIETY OF SACHEMS: $12k → 17%THE SENIOR SOCIETY OF SACHEMS: $12k → 17%THE SENIOR SOCIETY OF SACHEMS: $12k → 17%The Senior Society of Sachems: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$456k · 22 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against -75% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
7

Total granted

$456k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-75%

Still filing today

18%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SETON HALL UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $65k · revenue +39%
  • T1
    THE 1915 SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $50k · revenue +118%
  • AH
    AEROSPACE HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF UT
    5× · 2020–2024 · $21k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
2
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
3
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
4
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
5
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
8
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
9
Anderson University

The university is a comprehensive university affiliated with the south carolina baptist convention offering bachelors, masters, and doctorate degrees. located on approximately 398 acres in the upstate region of south carolina near the…

Education
10
Charleston Southern University

Charleston southern university (csu) is a private, four-year co-educational institution organized under the laws of the state of south carolina as a non-profit organization and sponsored by the south carolina baptist convention. the…

Education
11
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
12
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York; the most unlike its peers is Weber Junior Livestock Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SETON HALL UNIVERSITY: $64,954 · OtherSETON HALL UNIVERSITYThe Senior Society of Sachems: $61,000 · OtherThe Senior Society of SachemsTHE 1915 SOCIETY INC: $50,001 · OtherTHE 1915 SOCIETY INCDodgen Family: $49,854 · OtherDodgen FamilyMorgan County Jr Livetock Associati: $44,250 · OtherMorgan County Jr Livetock AssociatiLopez Family: $36,586 · OtherLopez FamilyST PAUL VI CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $32,832 · OtherST PAUL VI CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherAEROSPACE HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF UT: $21,350 · OtherST MARK CATHOLIC CHURCH: $20,500 · Other+31 more: $123,486 · Other+31 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $365,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY …Rochester Institute of Technology: $24,000 · EducationRochester Institute of Technology+2 more: $6,000 · EducationWEBER JUNIOR LIVESTOCK ASSOCIATION INC: $1,540 · Youth DevelopmentPEARLS OF VISION FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Community Improvement
Other$529,813Education$395,000Youth Development$1,540Community Improvement$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $365,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSETON HALL UNIVERSITY: $64,954 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $24,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAEROSPACE HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF UT: $21,350 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetFRANCIS PARKER SCHOOL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEBER JUNIOR LIVESTOCK ASSOCIATION INC: $1,540 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEARLS OF VISION FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCentral Fellowship Christian Academy Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds SETON HALL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE 1915 SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds AEROSPACE HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF UT ↗
  • Who funds FRANCIS PARKER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WEBER JUNIOR LIVESTOCK ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PEARLS OF VISION FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization ES3 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from ES3 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Seton Hall University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to ES3 Foundation?

Find your warmest path to ES3 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on ES3’s filings →

More from the funding graph