Skip to content

· Private foundation

Es Chappell & Son Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$21kHealth$6kEducation$5kEnvironment$4kRecreation & Sports$2kFood & Nutrition$1kPhilanthropy$1kYouth Development$175Other$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
3
States reached
$51k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEAL VETERANS FOUNDATION$6,000
HANOVER HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
DUCKS UNLIMITED$1,350
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$500
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$200
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF RICHMOND$200
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSP$200
MASSEY CANCER CENTER$200
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%SEAL VETERANS FOUNDATION: $6k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%SEAL VETERANS FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%REESESTRONG FOUNDATION: $500 → 5%SEAL VETERANS FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $300 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$36k · 16 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
11

Total granted

$36k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+75%

Still filing today

63%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $900 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    Ducks Unlimited Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $4k · revenue +12%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $3k · revenue +64%
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    5× · 2017–2023 · $2k · revenue +578%

Funded once

  • JM
    JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +75%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • CE
    CHARITABLE EVENT FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $800
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
2
Children's Health Foundation

Children's health foundation (chf) supports children's health system (chs) and children's hospital of the king's daughters (chkd). chf is organized and operated to carry out the charitable, educational and scientific purposes of chs and…

Health
3
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
4
Mcv Associated Physicians

The mission of the organization is to provide physicians and other healthcare professionals to support the needs of the community, as well as the academic mission of the vcu school of medicine.

Health
5
Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Conquer cancer funds research for every type of cancer to benefit every patient, everywhere. working in collaboration with a global network of top scientists and clinicians, and leading advocacy and research organizations, conquer cancer…

Health
6
Jefferson Scholars Foundation

The jefferson scholars foundation (foundation) provides academic merit-based scholarship, fellowship and professorship support to students and faculty at the university of virginia (uva).

Philanthropy
7
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
8
Vcu Investment Management Company

To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…

Education
9
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
10
The Childrens Cancer Foundation Inc

The Childrens Cancer Foundation, Inc. (Organization) is a charitable, not-for-profit corporation committed to funding locally-based researchers, programs and facilities until every child is assured a healthy cancer free future. The…

—
11
Fox Chase Cancer Center Foundation

To prevail over cancer, marshaling heart and mind in bold scientific discovery, pioneering prevention and compassionate care.

Health
12
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medical College of Va Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Reesestrong Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $4,750 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIESHANOVER HIGH SCHOOL: $3,650 · OtherHANOVER HIGH SCHOOLFRANCIS MARION UNIVERSITY SOFTBALL: $2,000 · OtherFRANCIS MARION UNIVERSITY SOFTBALLWINGS OF HOPE: $1,000 · OtherWINGS OF HOPEUNITED WAY: $1,000 · OtherUNITED WAYCHARITABLE EVENT FUND: $800 · OtherASK CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $745 · Other+10 more: $2,775 · Other+10 moreSEAL Veterans Foundation: $12,000 · Human ServicesSEAL Veterans FoundationWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,700 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesDucks Unlimited Inc: $3,950 · EnvironmentDucks Unli…THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,700 · HealthChildren's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation: $800 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $400 · HealthJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · EducationMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION: $500 · EducationFEED MORE INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionHEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $300 · Food & NutritionHANOVER HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $100 · Animals
Other$17,470Human Services$15,200Environment$3,950Health$2,900Education$1,500Food & Nutrition$1,300Animals$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEAL Veterans Foundation: $12,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $3,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MORE INC: $1,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASK CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEAL Veterans Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds FEED MORE INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ASK CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REESESTRONG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HANOVER HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Es Chappell & Son Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Es Chappell & Son Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Es Chappell & Son’s filings →

More from the funding graph