Skip to content

· Private foundation

Erdahl Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$181kReligion$114kInternational$20kCivil Rights$13kYouth Development$10kFood & Nutrition$5kRecreation & Sports$3kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$3,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$13k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PASSION 4 PEOPLE INTERNATIONAL$16,102
BELHAVEN UNIVERSITY$3,600
TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY$3,600
TAYLOR UNIVERSITY$3,600
NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY$3,600
PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY$1,800
GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY$1,800
WATOTO CHILD CARE MINISTRY$456
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%PASSION 4 PEOPLE INTERNATIONAL: $17k → 11%PASSION 4 PEOPLE INTERNATIONAL: $16k → 11%NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY: $8k → 11%GRACE PLACED MINISTRIES: $8k → 11%GRACE PLACED MINISTRIES: $7k → 11%NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%FRIENDS UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%FRIENDS UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%SHOW HOPE: $6k → 11%RURAL CHURCH YOUTH MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%CADENCE INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 11%CADENCE INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 11%RCE-INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 11%CADENCE INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 11%ETHNOS 360: $5k → 11%RCE-INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 11%RCE-INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 11%RURAL CHURCH YOUTH MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%THE MASTER UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%FRIENDS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%FRIENDS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%PORTLAND BIBLE COLLEGE: $5k → 11%PASSION 4 PEOPLE INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 11%ETHNOS 360: $4k → 11%FRIENDS UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%RURAL CHURCH YOUTH MINISTRIES: $4k → 11%CADENCE INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 11%RCE-INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 11%MAGEZI MINISTRIES: $4k → 11%TAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%MAGEZI MINISTRIES: $4k → 11%NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%MAGEZI MINISTRIES: $4k → 11%MAGEZI MINISTRIES: $4k → 11%BELHAVEN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%RURAL CHURCH YOUTH MINISTRIES: $4k → 11%GLOBAL SEED PLANTERS: $4k → 11%NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%YOUNG LIFE: $3k → 11%TAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY: $3k → 11%PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%THE MASTER UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$330k · 27 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
19

Total granted

$330k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+21%

Still filing today

19%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NU
    NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2018–2025 · $31k · revenue +3%
  • RC
    RURAL CHURCH YOUTH MINISTRIES
    5× · 2018–2024 · $18k · revenue +5%
  • MM
    MAGEZI MINISTRIES
    5× · 2018–2022 · $15k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • SH
    SHOW HOPE
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • RT
    RUN TO WIN OUTREACH
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +21%
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF OZARKS
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PASSION 4 PEOPLE INTERNATIONAL: $37,452 · OtherPASSION 4 PEOPLE INTERNATIONALNORTHWEST UNIVERSITY: $31,150 · OtherNORTHWEST UNIVERSITYFRIENDS UNIVERSITY: $26,700 · OtherFRIENDS UNIVERSITYRCE-INTERNATIONAL: $18,400 · OtherRCE-INTERNATIONALCADENCE INTERNATIONAL: $18,400 · OtherCADENCE INTERNATIONALTRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY: $17,400 · OtherTRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITYPORTLAND BIBLE COLLEGE: $15,000 · OtherGRACE PLACED MINISTRIES: $14,100 · OtherETHNOS 360: $13,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,400 · OtherGRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $10,800 · OtherTHE MASTER UNIVERSITY: $10,500 · Other+30 more: $78,484 · Other+30 moreRURAL CHURCH YOUTH MINISTRIES: $17,900 · ReligionRURAL CHUR…MAGEZI MINISTRIES: $15,100 · ReligionMAGEZI MIN…YOUNG LIFE: $8,600 · Youth DevelopmentRUN TO WIN OUTREACH: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentPacific Lutheran University: $7,800 · Education
Other$303,186Religion$33,000Youth Development$11,100Education$7,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHWEST UNIVERSITY: $31,150 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRURAL CHURCH YOUTH MINISTRIES: $17,900 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetMAGEZI MINISTRIES: $15,100 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $8,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Lutheran University: $7,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRUN TO WIN OUTREACH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEUROPEAN CHRISTIAN MISSION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds RURAL CHURCH YOUTH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MAGEZI MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Lutheran University ↗
  • Who funds RUN TO WIN OUTREACH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Erdahl Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Erdahl Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Erdahl Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph