Skip to content

· Private foundation

Erco Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$36kFood & Nutrition$14kInternational$13kAnimals$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kPhilanthropy$2kReligion$2kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$567
Median grant
7
States reached
$75k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$6,050
FEED THE CHILDREN$2,070
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$785
FOOD FOR THE POOR$577
NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE$567
STAND UP TO CANCER$523
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$500
BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOC$500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$120
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TESTICULAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $784 → 10%TESTICULAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $784 → 10%TESTICULAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $523 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
NJ
CA
UT
MO
MD
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$86k · 20 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
14

Total granted

$86k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+97%

Still filing today

70%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $17k · revenue +145%
  • NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $8k · revenue +15%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    6× · 2017–2022 · $7k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • CC
    COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +97%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +106%
  • TL
    TOWN LAKE ANIMAL CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
4
Childfund Alliance

Childfund alliance is a global network of 11 child-focused development and humanitarian organizations working in more than 70 countries. we help nearly 30 million children and their families to overcome poverty and the underlying…

International
5
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
6
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc

For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…

International
7
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
9
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
10
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
11
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
12
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Abs Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FEED THE CHILDREN: $8,228 · OtherFEED THE CHILDRENBILLY GRAHAM: $5,000 · OtherBILLY GRAHAMAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $3,809 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $1,500 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESTOWN LAKE ANIMAL CENTER: $1,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1,000 · Other+9 more: $4,750 · Other+9 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $16,931 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH H…American Heart Association Inc: $6,150 · HealthAmerican Heart Association In…COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $1,500 · HealthCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCEUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $4,720 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND …MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,090 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONT…FEED THE CHILDREN INC: $3,631 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN I…GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDA…FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $1,394 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR I…+1 more: $500 · InternationalNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $7,880 · AnimalsNORTH SHOR…BIDEAWEE INC: $510 · AnimalsBIDEAWEE I…BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $500 · AnimalsBEST FRIEN…+1 more: $250 · AnimalsAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $6,500 · Human ServicesAmerican N…Testicular Cancer Foundation: $2,091 · Human ServicesTesticular…STAND UP TO CANCER: $5,334 · PhilanthropySTAND UP …GOFUNDMEORG: $2,496 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEO…Christian Herald Association Inc: $1,150 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 · ReligionFeeding America: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$25,287Health$24,581International$16,335Animals$9,140Human Services$8,591Philanthropy$7,830Religion$2,150Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $16,931 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $7,880 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $6,150 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTAND UP TO CANCER: $5,334 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $4,720 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,090 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $3,631 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $2,496 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTesticular Cancer Foundation: $2,091 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $1,394 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc: $1,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIDEAWEE INC: $510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren International: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds STAND UP TO CANCER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds Testicular Cancer Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Christian Herald Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds BIDEAWEE INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Children International ↗
  • Who funds ABS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PAUL THE CAT GUY INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Erco Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Erco Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Erco Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Erco Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Erco’s filings →

More from the funding graph