Skip to content

Missouri · Private foundation

Erbe Harry John Tr U W

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$11k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2025
2
Organizations funded FY2024
50%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,500
Largest grant, FY2025
$5,500
Organizations funded a year
1 to 3
FY2019 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$226k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 50% of the organizations Erbe Harry John Tr U W funded were first-time grantees, receiving 50% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving2$11k50%
FY20242$10k50%
FY20232$10k0%
FY20222$10k100%
FY20211$10k100%
FY20202$12k100%
FY20193$15kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$27kHealth$16kReligion$14kHuman Services$10kPhilanthropy$6kEducation$6k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($16k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Foundation for Enhancing CommunitiesPA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Erbe Harry John Tr U W with peer funders

About Erbe Harry John Tr U W

How much does Erbe Harry John Tr U W give?
Erbe Harry John Tr U W reported 2 grants totaling $11,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 3 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.
What does Erbe Harry John Tr U W fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (34%), Health (21%), Religion (18%).
Who are Erbe Harry John Tr U W's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: Cocoa Packs Inc ($21k), Downtown Daily Bread ($10k), Lancaster County Therapeutic Riding Inc D/B/A Greystone Manor Therapeutic Riding ($7k).
Does Erbe Harry John Tr U W fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Erbe Harry John Tr U W accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Erbe Harry John Tr U W?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Foundation for Enhancing Communities, Central Pennsylvania Food Bank, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.
Where is Erbe Harry John Tr U W based?
Erbe Harry John Tr U W is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Erbe Harry John Tr U W’s filings →

More from the funding graph