Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Erath County Gateway Corporation

FUND THE NEEDS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 92% of ERATH COUNTY GATEWAY CORPORATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $74k
$6,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$577k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAPTIST STUDENT MINISTRIES$26,400
CHOICES LIFE RESOURCE CENTER$24,000
FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDREN$24,000
WOODBRIDGE CHURCH$6,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA$6,000
RESTORATION ADVOCATES$6,000
SHRINER'S HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$6,000
CASA FOR THE CROSS TIMBERS AREA$6,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$6,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$5,500
BACKPACK BUDDIES OF ERATH COUNTY$3,300
GATEWAY CHURCH$2,750
Individual grant recipient$1,000
COWBOY CHURCH$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RESTORATION ADVOCATES: $10k → 13%RESTORATION ADVOCATES: $6k → 13%CASA FOR THE CROSS TIMBERS AREA: $6k → 13%CASA FOR THE CROSS TIMBERS AREA: $6k → 13%RESTORATION ADVOCATES: $6k → 13%CASA FOR THE CROSS TIMBERS AREA: $6k → 13%RESTORATION ADVOCATES: $6k → 13%RESTORATION ADVOCATES: $6k → 13%RESTORATION ADVOCATES: $6k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 15 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$1.8M
$136k

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SHERWOOD & MYRTIE FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDREN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $214k · revenue +194%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $54k · revenue +145%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    7× · 2019–2025 · $42k · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • LB
    LINGLEVILLE BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • CC
    COWBOY CHURCH OF ERATH COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • TS
    TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CH
    one grant, 2018 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WOODBRIDGE CHURCH — $306,500 · OtherWOODBRIDGE CHURCHSTONEWATER CHURCH — $300,000 · OtherSTONEWATER CHURCHCHOICES LIFE RESOURCE CENTER — $263,287 · OtherCHOICES LIFE RESOURCE CENTERBAPTIST STUDENT MINISTRIES — $234,100 · OtherBAPTIST STUDENT MINISTRIESSHERWOOD & MYRTIE FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDREN — $214,322 · OtherSHERWOOD & MYRTIE FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDRENTIMBER RIDGE CHURCH — $175,000 · OtherTIMBER RIDGE CHURCHLINGLEVILLE BAPTIST CHURCH — $100,000 · OtherLINGLEVILLE BAPTIST CHURCH+10 more — $150,250 · Other+10 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $54,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $42,000 · HealthRESTORATION ADVOCATES — $39,500 · Human ServicesCASA FOR THE CROSS TIMBERS AREA INC — $18,000 · Human Services
Other$1,743,459Health$96,000Human Services$57,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHERWOOD & MYRTIE FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDREN — $214,322 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $54,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $42,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRESTORATION ADVOCATES — $39,500 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetCASA FOR THE CROSS TIMBERS AREA INC — $18,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHERWOOD & MYRTIE FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds RESTORATION ADVOCATES
  • Who funds CASA FOR THE CROSS TIMBERS AREA INC
  • Who funds MESSIANIC JEWISH BIBLE INSTITUTE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Erath County Gateway Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Erath County Gateway Corporation?

Find your warmest path to Erath County Gateway Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph