· Public charity
Equity in Education Coalition
Eliminating the opportunity gap and promoting birth-through-career success for all childrenof color in washington stat
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 23 grants below total $3,052,367 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,117,133 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $64,766 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $242k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+2 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS WA | $1,000,000 |
| FRESHSTART | $424,600 |
| NORTHWEST CENTER | $214,985 |
| TRIBAL TECHNOLOGY TRAINING | $181,872 |
| UNIDOS NUEVA ALIANZA FOUNDATION | $166,750 |
| MISSION AFRICA | $140,000 |
| CAMBODIAN AMERICAN COUNCIL OF WA | $140,000 |
| LATINOS EN SPOKANE | $110,000 |
| FILIPINO COMMUNITY OF SEATTLE | $100,000 |
| CENTRO-AMERICANO | $60,400 |
| HOUSE OF MERCY | $60,000 |
| MINDSIGHT MENTORS | $52,000 |
| BEACON BUSINESS ALLIANCE | $52,000 |
| FUSE INNOVATION FUND (COMMUNICATIONS HUB) | $50,000 |
| MOTHER AFRICA | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $664k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KCKHMER COMMUNITY OF SEATTLE KING COUNTY3× · 2020–2023 · $134k · revenue +389%
- BHBEACON HILL MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION2× · 2022–2023 · $107k · revenue +140%
- ACASOTIN COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · $78k · revenue +250% · 60% of their budget
Funded once
- EIEQUITY IN EDUCATION COALITIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $135k · revenue +50%
- FCFILIPINO COMMUNITY OF SEATTLEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $38k · revenue +75%
- EAEritrean Association of Greater Seattleone grant, 2020 · $38k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Washington Indian Civil Rights Commission is led by and for Indigenous people, and envisions a just society in which we are treated with honor, fairness and respect. Our mission is to uphold our individual civil rights through education…
Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…
Washington Community Alliance WCA is a statewide network of over 70 organizations working to advance multiracial social democracy by coordinating values aligned civic engagement
Asians for Collective Action (ACA) harnesses the strenghts of Asians and Asian Americans to drive systemic change to create a just, healthy, and thriving community for all.
Rainier Beach Action Coalition is a grassroot, Black-led organization devoted to locally driven development. It promotes quality education, living wage jobs, affordable transportation and housing, and building community capacity in…
The Cambodian American Community Council of Washington's (CACCWA) mission is to strengthen Cambodian-American communities and organizations by promoting and supporting mult-ethnic community unity, cultural preservation, partnerships,…
Improve the business enviornment, sanitation and public safety in the historical Chinatown-International district of Seattle, WA.
To provide services needed in the community
We increase access to economic opportunities for business owners, entrepreneurs, and individuals in Central Washington by connecting and providing them with resources, representation, and opportunities to build community.
The Pacific Islander Community Association of WA PICA-WA serves as a cultural home, centers community power and advocates to further the wellness of Pacific Islander communities in Washington State.
Comunidad seeks to build community, cultural pride, and economic opportunities for the Latino community on Vashon Island and its neighboring communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yakima Valley Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is DARE2BE Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF WASHINGTON STATE ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST CENTER ↗
- Who funds Mission Africa ↗
- Who funds CANDID ↗
- Who funds Tribal Technology Training ↗
- Who funds Latino Community Fund of Washington State ↗
- Who funds Unidos Nueva Alianza Foundation ↗
- Who funds EQUITY IN EDUCATION COALITION ↗
- Who funds KHMER COMMUNITY OF SEATTLE KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ORGANIZACION CENTROAMERICANA ↗
- Who funds BEACON HILL MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASOTIN COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHAM REFUGEES COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF MERCY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY NETWORK COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Fuse Innovation Fund ↗
- Who funds MOTHER AFRICA ↗
- Who funds NATIVE ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds DARE2BE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds FILIPINO COMMUNITY OF SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds RVC SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds Tukwila Childrens Foundation ↗
- Who funds BEACON HILL BUSINESS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds LAO COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds East African Community Services ↗
- Who funds UNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA ↗
- Who funds INDIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · School's Out Washington · Philanthropy Northwest · Inatai Foundation · United Way of King County · Front and Centered · Renton Regional Community Fndn · Artsfund · Sheng-Yen Lu Foundation · Washington State Microenterprise Association · Social Justice Fund Northwest · Gates Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Equity in Education Coalition funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Equity in Education Coalition?
Find your warmest path to Equity in Education Coalition through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.