Skip to content
Episcopal Relief and Development at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Episcopal Relief and Development

Episcopal relief & development (the organization") is an affiliate of the domestic and foreign missionary society of the protestant episcopal church of the united states of america (the "society or "dfms").

$14M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$275k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$14MInternational$1.6MReligion$490kEmployment$265kEnvironment$120kPublic Benefit$50kCivil Rights$15k
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 20 grants below total $1,389,150, the rows itemized in this filing. The $14,168,945 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,779,795 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $931k
  • $250k+1 grant · $275k
$30,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN HAWAII$275,150
DIOCESE OF PUERTO RICO$225,000
DIOCESE OF THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF LOUISIANA$204,000
EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA$125,000
EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN DIOCESE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$120,000
DIOCESE OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA$87,000
HEBREW IMMIGRANT AID SOCIETY-HIAS$70,000
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$50,000
TOGETHER LOUISIANA$50,000
DIOCESE OF RIO GRANDE$30,000
DIOCESE OF EAST TENNESSEE$25,000
DIOCESE OF GEORGIA$25,000
JOINT LEARNING INITIATIVE ON FAITH AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES$20,000
DIOCESE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$20,000
DIOCESE OF FLORIDA$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAINE IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION: $8k → 7%Interchurch Medical Assistance Inc: $1.1M → 14%Interchurch Medical Assistance Inc (IMA): $15k → 14%COLABORATIVA LA MILPA: $10k → 12%Diocese of Northern California: $30k → 12%Diocese of Northern California: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IN
OH
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $13M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$7.2M · 56% · 25 grants

Stated purpose: EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT · VIOLENCE PREVENTION, PROTECTION & RESILIENCE · INTEGRATED CLIMATE RESILIENCE

Central America and the Caribbean$2.4M · 19% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: INTEGRATED CLIMATE RESILIENCE · EMERGENCY RELIEF · INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$2.0M · 16% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: EMERGENCY RELIEF · VIOLENCE PREVENTION, PROTECTION & RESILIENCE · INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT/EMERGENCY RELIEF

Middle East and North Africa$491k · 4% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: EMERGENCY RELIEF · EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT

South America$467k · 4% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: INTEGRATED CLIMATE RESILIENCE · EMERGENCY RELIEF

South Asia$126k · 1% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: EMERGENCY RELIEF

East Asia and the Pacific$81k · 1% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: EMERGENCY RELIEF

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 38 repeat orgs$865k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
22

Total granted

$15M
$456k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+5%

Still filing today

18%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $409k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalReligionPublic BenefitPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    Together Louisiana
    3× · 2022–2024 · $275k · revenue +157%
  • NY
    NEW YORK DISASTER INTERFAITH SERVICES INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $190k · revenue +288%
  • EP
    EL PORVENIR
    3× · 2018–2020 · $190k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • DO
    DIOCESE OF SOUTHEAST FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $110k
  • EP
    EL PORVENIR CHRISTIAN CAMP
    one grant, 2017 · $60k · 55% of their budget
  • SJ
    ST JOHN THE DIVINE EPISCOPAL CHURCH RECTOR WARDENS & VESTRY
    one grant, 2023 · $28k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Episcopal Relief and Development

Episcopal relief & development (the organization") is an affiliate of the domestic and foreign missionary society of the protestant episcopal church of the united states of america (the "society or "dfms"). (see schedule o)

Human Services
2
Project New Hope International

Publicly supported evangelical organization focused on community transformation and empowerment of impoverished neighborhoods in South America and around the world. Missionaries work with community leaders assisting them in various mission…

—
3
Inter-America Mission
—
4
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
5
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
6
Evangelism Partners International
Religion
7
Lutheran Social Services Disaster Response Inc

Our mission is to provide help, healing and hope in the name of jesus christ.

—
8
Women's Ordination Conference

Our mission is to advocate and pray for womens ordination as deacons, priests, and bishops into an inclusive and accountable roman catholic church.

Religion
9
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
10
Fellowship Southwest

Fellowship Southwest is an ecumenical regional network of Christians and partner ministries promoting compassion, justice and connection throughout the Southwest US. Our ministry includes a network of pastors serving migrants on both sides…

Religion
11
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
12
Ministerio Evangelico Lazos De Amor

Integral development of communi

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Joint Learning Initiative On Faith and Local Communities; the most unlike its peers is El Porvenir Christian Camp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH DIOCESE OF TEXAS: $4,262,000 · OtherPROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH DIOCESE OF TEXASIGLESIA EPISCOPAL PUERTORRIQUENA INC: $2,665,356 · OtherIGLESIA EPISCOPAL PUERTORRIQUENA INCEPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF WESTERN LOUISIANA: $1,416,900 · OtherEPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF WESTERN LOUISIANADIOCESE OF WEST TEXAS: $912,797 · OtherDIOCESE OF WEST TEXASDIOCESE OF EAST CAROLINA: $565,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $485,742 · OtherEPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE DIOCESE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $480,448 · Other+49 more: $2,957,368 · Other+49 moreCONVOY OF HOPE: $648,222 · InternationalCONVOY OF…AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $300,000 · InternationalAMERICAN …EL PORVENIR: $190,000 · InternationalEL PORVEN…CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $145,000 · InternationalCHURCH WO…HIAS INC: $70,000 · InternationalINTERCHURCH MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC: $1,127,020 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE DIOCESE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $60,000 · Human Services+2 more: $17,500 · Human ServicesTogether Louisiana: $274,815 · Public BenefitNEW YORK DISASTER INTERFAITH SERVICES INC: $190,000 · Public Safety & DisasterEpiscopal Foundation of Western NC: $25,000 · ReligionJOINT LEARNING INITIATIVE ON FAITH AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES: $20,000 · Religion
Other$13,745,611International$1,353,222Human Services$1,204,520Public Benefit$274,815Public Safety & Disaster$190,000Religion$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERCHURCH MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC: $1,127,020 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $648,222 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $300,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTogether Louisiana: $274,815 over 3y, 12% of budgetNEW YORK DISASTER INTERFAITH SERVICES INC: $190,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetEL PORVENIR: $190,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $145,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHIAS INC: $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEL PORVENIR CHRISTIAN CAMP: $59,533 over 1y, 55% of budgetEpiscopal Foundation of Western NC: $25,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetJOINT LEARNING INITIATIVE ON FAITH AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES: $20,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetColaborativa La Milpa: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAINE IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERCHURCH MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Together Louisiana ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK DISASTER INTERFAITH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds EL PORVENIR ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE DIOCESE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds EL PORVENIR CHRISTIAN CAMP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncThe Community Foundat…Boston Foundation IncImpactassetsincShell USA Company Fou…Silicon Valley Commun…Good360The Chicago Community…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Raymond James Charita…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…
Lilly Endowment IncIN13.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Good360 · The Chicago Community Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Episcopal Relief and Development funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Episcopal Relief and Development. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Interchurch Medical Assistance Inc: 76% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Episcopal Relief and Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home