· Public charity
Episcopal Relief and Development
Episcopal relief & development (the organization") is an affiliate of the domestic and foreign missionary society of the protestant episcopal church of the united states of america (the "society or "dfms").
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $1,389,150 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $14,168,945 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,779,795 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $175k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $931k
- $250k+1 grant · $275k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN HAWAII | $275,150 |
| DIOCESE OF PUERTO RICO | $225,000 |
| DIOCESE OF THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF LOUISIANA | $204,000 |
| EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA | $125,000 |
| EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN DIOCESE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA | $120,000 |
| DIOCESE OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA | $87,000 |
| HEBREW IMMIGRANT AID SOCIETY-HIAS | $70,000 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE | $50,000 |
| TOGETHER LOUISIANA | $50,000 |
| DIOCESE OF RIO GRANDE | $30,000 |
| DIOCESE OF EAST TENNESSEE | $25,000 |
| DIOCESE OF GEORGIA | $25,000 |
| DIOCESE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA | $20,000 |
| JOINT LEARNING INITIATIVE ON FAITH AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES | $20,000 |
| DIOCESE OF FLORIDA | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $13M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT · VIOLENCE PREVENTION, PROTECTION & RESILIENCE · INTEGRATED CLIMATE RESILIENCE
Stated purpose: INTEGRATED CLIMATE RESILIENCE · EMERGENCY RELIEF · INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT
Stated purpose: EMERGENCY RELIEF · VIOLENCE PREVENTION, PROTECTION & RESILIENCE · INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT/EMERGENCY RELIEF
Stated purpose: EMERGENCY RELIEF · EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT
Stated purpose: INTEGRATED CLIMATE RESILIENCE · EMERGENCY RELIEF
Stated purpose: EMERGENCY RELIEF
Stated purpose: EMERGENCY RELIEF
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +84% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $409k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IMINTERCHURCH MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC2× · 2017–2018 · $1.1M · revenue +0%
- TLTogether Louisiana3× · 2022–2024 · $275k · revenue +157%
- EPEL PORVENIR3× · 2018–2020 · $190k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- DODIOCESE OF SOUTHEAST FLORIDA INCone grant, 2017 · $110k
- EPEL PORVENIR CHRISTIAN CAMPone grant, 2017 · $60k · 55% of their budget
- SJST JOHN THE DIVINE EPISCOPAL CHURCH RECTOR WARDENS & VESTRYone grant, 2023 · $28k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Episcopal relief & development (the organization") is an affiliate of the domestic and foreign missionary society of the protestant episcopal church of the united states of america (the "society or "dfms"). (see schedule o)
Publicly supported evangelical organization focused on community transformation and empowerment of impoverished neighborhoods in South America and around the world. Missionaries work with community leaders assisting them in various mission…
International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.
Fellowship Southwest is an ecumenical regional network of Christians and partner ministries promoting compassion, justice and connection throughout the Southwest US. Our ministry includes a network of pastors serving migrants on both sides…
To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.
Church
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Elnac dba proclaim cuba works closely with a cuban religious organization named elnac. the name is derived from a spanish acronym organization named elnac. the name is derevied from a spanish acronym empoderando las naciones, empowering…
Our mission is to provide help, healing and hope in the name of jesus christ.
Compelled by a deep passion for justice and mercy, World Renew joins communities around the world to renew hope, reconcile lives, and restore creation with programs focused on disaster response, community health, economic opportunity, food…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interchurch Medical Assistance Inc and the most unlike its peers is El Porvenir Christian Camp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 86 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTERCHURCH MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds Together Louisiana ↗
- Who funds EL PORVENIR ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK DISASTER INTERFAITH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds HIAS INC ↗
- Who funds EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE DIOCESE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds EL PORVENIR CHRISTIAN CAMP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Good360 · The Chicago Community Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Episcopal Relief and Development funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Interchurch Medical Assistance Inc — 76% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.