Skip to content
Eom Acl Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Eom Acl Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$384k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$1.1MEducation$212kHuman Services$166kHousing & Shelter$15kPhilanthropy$5kArts & Culture$3k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $229k
$18,613
Median grant
3
States reached
$72k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YEMIN$64,000
EOM Foundation$60,000
KEREN AHAVAS CHESED$55,000
American Friends of Rabbinical Coll$50,000
Mechon Matnas Chaim$40,000
THE LAKEWOOD CHEDER$28,000
YESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC$25,000
CHICAGO COMMUNITY KOLLEL$18,613
Congregation Ateres Yisroel$18,000
Congregation and Yeshiva Beth Hille$5,000
Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc$5,000
YESHIVA TIFERES HATALMUD$5,000
Various$4,500
CONG AHAVAS TZEDUKA VCHESED$4,000
MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 62% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Congregation Chesed Vemes: $12k → 13%AMUDIM: $10k → 17%Chesed Vemes: $25k → 20%CHICAGO COMMUNITY KOLLEL: $19k → 14%Congregation Ahavas Chesed Torah: $52k → 11%YESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC: $25k → 12%Chesed Vemes: $18k → 20%CHICAGO COMMUNITY KOLLEL: $18k → 14%YESHIVA GEDOLAH NAOS YAAKOV: $50k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YEMIN: $111k → 20%CHICAGO COMMUNITY KOLLEL: $14k → 14%American Friends of Rabbinical Coll: $50k → 11%Congregation and Yeshiva Beth Hille: $10k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YEMIN: $64k → 20%Congregation Ateres Yisroel: $43k → 11%CONG AHAVAS TZEDUKA VCHESED: $55k → 20%Mechon Matnas Chaim: $40k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YEMIN: $48k → 20%THE LAKEWOOD CHEDER: $37k → 11%CONG AHAVAS TZEDUKA VCHESED: $42k → 20%THE LAKEWOOD CHEDER: $36k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YEMIN: $40k → 20%Congregation Ateres Yisroel: $31k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YEMIN: $25k → 20%THE LAKEWOOD CHEDER: $28k → 11%CONG AHAVAS TZEDUKA VCHESED: $22k → 20%THE LAKEWOOD CHEDER: $27k → 11%CONG AHAVAS TZEDUKA VCHESED: $20k → 20%Congregation Ateres Yisroel: $25k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YEMIN: $15k → 20%THE LAKEWOOD CHEDER: $24k → 11%THE LAKEWOOD CHEDER: $24k → 11%Congregation Ateres Yisroel: $23k → 11%AHAVAS TORAH VCHESED: $22k → 11%MERKAZ HATZEDAKA CORP: $20k → 11%THE LAKEWOOD CHEDER: $20k → 11%Congregation Ateres Yisroel: $18k → 11%KEREN AHAVAS CHESED: $55k → 20%THE LAKEWOOD CHEDER: $13k → 11%KEREN AHAVAS CHESED: $50k → 20%YESHIVA GEDOLAH NAOS YAAKOV: $10k → 11%Various: $14k → 20%EOM Foundation: $60k → 20%EOM Foundation: $60k → 20%EOM Foundation: $36k → 20%EOM Foundation: $35k → 20%EOM Foundation: $20k → 20%EOM Foundation: $20k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 30 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
12

Total granted

$1.7M
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

23%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionPhilanthropyInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YEMIN INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $320k · revenue +19%
  • LC
    LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $209k · revenue +54%
  • YG
    YESHIVA GEDOLA NA'OS YAAKOV
    2× · 2018–2019 · $60k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • CA
    Congregation Ahavas Chesed Torah
    one grant, 2023 · $52k
  • MH
    MERKAZ HATZEDAKA CORP
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
4
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
5
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
6
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
7
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
9
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
10
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
11
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
12
Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Ktana of Passaic; the most unlike its peers is Ahavas Torah V'chesed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EOM Foundation: $231,000 · OtherEOM FoundationCONG AHAVAS TZEDUKA VCHESED: $152,300 · OtherCONG AHAVAS TZEDUKA VCHESEDCONGREGATION ATERES YISROEL: $149,720 · OtherCONGREGATION ATERES YISROELKEREN AHAVAS CHESED: $105,000 · OtherKEREN AHAVAS CHESEDCHICAGO COMMUNITY KOLLEL INC: $70,028 · OtherCHICAGO COMMUNITY KOLLEL INCAmerican Friends of Rabbinical Coll: $55,000 · OtherCongregation Ahavas Chesed Torah: $52,000 · OtherCHESED VEMES: $43,000 · OtherMECHON MATNAS CHAIM INC: $40,000 · Other+24 more: $255,925 · Other+24 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YEMIN INC: $319,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF…LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $208,700 · EducationLAKEWOOD CHEDER S…YESHIVA GEDOLA NA'OS YAAKOV: $60,000 · EducationYESHIVA GEDOLA NA…TALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $16,000 · EducationTALMUDIC RESEARCH…+2 more: $6,000 · EducationYESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC: $30,000 · ReligionZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $18,000 · ReligionMERKAZ HATZEDAKA CORP: $20,000 · Community ImprovementKOL YEHUDA INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyDONORS FUND INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyAHAVAS TORAH V'CHESED: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,153,973International$319,500Education$290,700Religion$48,000Community Improvement$20,000Philanthropy$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YEMIN INC: $319,500 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $208,700 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLA NA'OS YAAKOV: $60,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMERKAZ HATZEDAKA CORP: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $16,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKOL YEHUDA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDONORS FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZichron Yaakov Yitzchok Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCHEDER EITZ CHAIM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YEMIN INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA GEDOLA NA'OS YAAKOV ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC ↗
  • Who funds MERKAZ HATZEDAKA CORP ↗
  • Who funds ZICHRON ELIYAHU INC ↗
  • Who funds TALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA TIFERES HATALMUD INC ↗
  • Who funds KOL YEHUDA INC ↗
  • Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds Zichron Yaakov Yitzchok Inc ↗
  • Who funds AHAVAS TORAH V'CHESED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJewish Communal FundThe Jmg FoundationJack Adjmi Family Fou…Jewish Community Foun…Md Friedman Family Fo…Regina Goldwasser Fou…Toras Chesed IncZichron Btz Tzedakah …Zichron Chaim Charity…The Jimmy and Berta K…Joseph Chehebar Famil…
The Ojc FundNY31.2× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The Jmg Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Md Friedman Family Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Toras Chesed Inc · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Joseph Chehebar Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eom Acl Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eom Acl Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eom Acl’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home