Skip to content

· Private foundation

Enkess Charitable Foundation Trust The

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$383k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$132k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$600kPhilanthropy$352kEducation$22kHealth$5kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $132k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $196k
$6,100
Median grant
1
States reached
$868k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Yeshiva Machzikei Hadas$132,450
Belz Institutions in Israel$64,000
Various Charitable Organizations$44,501
american Friends of Belz$30,000
Lomdei Torah$26,940
Bikur Ezras Cholim$20,000
Bnoseinu$10,300
Kolel Belz$8,950
Noam Elimelech$7,602
Mosdos Belz USA$6,100
ahavas chesed$5,830
Individual grant recipient$5,000
JES 2016$4,000
bonei Olam$3,600
Individual grant recipient$3,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%JES 2016 INC: $13k → 20%JES 2016 INC: $6k → 20%JES 2016: $4k → 20%bonei Olam: $4k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$768k · 20 repeat orgs$258k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +116% since the first grant, against +114% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
20

Total granted

$768k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+116%
+114%

Still filing today

20%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $170k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BV
    Bikur Vezrat Cholim Inc
    3× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +119%
  • J2
    JES 2016 INC
    3× · 2018–2025 · $22k · revenue +116%
  • YO
    Yeshiva of Machzikai Hadas Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $19k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • YT
    YAGDIL TORAH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +114%
  • IB
    ICHUD BOARD OF BELZ INSTITUTIONS
    one grant, 2018 · $14k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BEER HACHESED
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
2
American Friends of Merkaz Hachinuch Habeer Inc

Provide aid to support and assist tax exempt Jewish religious education institutions or the equivalent in foreign countries.

—
3
American Friends of Birkat Haaretz Inc

The purpose of Birkat Haaretz is to promote the laws of shmitta accordance to Jewish law.

Religion
4
Vaad Hapula Inc

Support jewry in Israel

Religion
5
Vaad L 'Hatzolas Nidchei Yisroel Inc

To coordinate and administer programs for the dissemination of jewish religious practices and teaching to members of the jewish community in the commonwealth of independent states and other countries and to refugees and immigrants…

Religion
6
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
7
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
8
Friends of Tzeirei Chabad in Israel Inc

To pursue a greater outreach of knowledge of the Jewish Torah and to further educate the less knowledgeable

Religion
9
Bais Vaad Lechachomim Yerishulayim Inc

We promote and spread the religious teachings and philosophies of the holy Baal Shem Tov from Poland, who is regarded as the founder of Hasidic Judaism We provide financial assistance to Bais Vaad Lechachomim, a not for profit organization…

Religion
10
Hayashar Vehatov Inc

The furtherance of primacy of orthodox jewish jurisprudence

Religion
11
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
12
Zeev Hatorah Inc

To provide synagogue services to the local community and torah study for american students in israel.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Keren Hashviis Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Belz Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVA MACHZIKEI HADAS: $197,527 · OtherYESHIVA MACHZIKEI HADASMISC CHARITABLE 1000: $158,901 · OtherMISC CHARITABLE 1000Various Charitable Organizations: $113,534 · OtherVarious Charitable OrganizationsBelz Institutions in Israel: $64,000 · OtherBelz Institutions in Israel+40 more: $306,022 · Other+40 moreBikur Vezrat Cholim Inc: $80,000 · PhilanthropyYeshiva of Machzikai Hadas Inc: $18,807 · ReligionYAGDIL TORAH INC: $15,079 · ReligionKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $1,300 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BELZ INC: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterJES 2016 INC: $22,401 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $3,600 · Human ServicesAmerican Friends of Hungarian Jewish Heritage Inc: $12,709 · Arts & CultureVAAD LTZORCHAY REFUAH: $1,800 · Health
Other$839,984Philanthropy$80,000Religion$35,186Housing & Shelter$30,000Human Services$26,001Arts & Culture$12,709Health$1,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBikur Vezrat Cholim Inc: $80,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BELZ INC: $30,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetJES 2016 INC: $22,401 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetYeshiva of Machzikai Hadas Inc: $18,807 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYAGDIL TORAH INC: $15,079 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetAmerican Friends of Hungarian Jewish Heritage Inc: $12,709 over 4y, 15% of budgetVAAD LTZORCHAY REFUAH: $1,800 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bikur Vezrat Cholim Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BELZ INC ↗
  • Who funds JES 2016 INC ↗
  • Who funds Yeshiva of Machzikai Hadas Inc ↗
  • Who funds YAGDIL TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Hungarian Jewish Heritage Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY44.1× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Pledger Charitable Ltd · Yeshiva Chasidei Belz Belz Institutions in Israel · Chaim V'Shulem Foundation Inc · Gemsy Zay Foundation Inc · B&M Steinmetz Foundation · Hf Foundation · Rodef Chesed DBA Ahavas Chesed · Bais Ephraim Charitable Foundation Trust · Yeled V'Yalda Early Childhood Center Inc · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Enkess Charitable Foundation Trust The funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Enkess Charitable Foundation Trust The. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Enkess Charitable Foundation Trust The?

    Find your warmest path to Enkess Charitable Foundation Trust The through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Enkess Charitable Foundation Trust The’s filings →

    More from the funding graph