Skip to content
Enide Allison Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Enide Allison Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$82kEducation$72kArts & Culture$58kFood & Nutrition$47kPublic Benefit$45kReligion$38kPhilanthropy$26kHuman Services$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $43k
$6,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY SPIRIT HOUSE OF PRAYER$12,500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$10,000
AVODAH$10,000
ECHO RIDGE SEVENTH DAY ADVANTS ELEM$10,000
ACHIEVE CHARTER SCHOOL OF PARADISE$8,000
FROM THE GROUND UP FARMS$6,500
OUR CHILDREN'S EARTH FOUNDATION$6,500
GOLDEN VALLEY COMMUNITY BROADCASTER$5,000
PUBLIC BROADCASTING MUSIC TV$5,000
JESUS PROVIDES DAILY BREAD$5,000
ACHIEVE CHARTER SCHOOL OF PARADISE$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CATALYST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES: $3k → 18%CATALYST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES: $5k → 12%CATALYST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES: $3k → 12%CATALYST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OR
NV
IA
CA
NM
NC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$358k · 11 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$358k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+52%

Still filing today

64%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationPublic BenefitPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ACHIEVE CHARTER SCHOOL OF PARADISE
    4× · 2017–2024 · $57k · revenue +193%
  • GV
    GOLDEN VALLEY COMMUNITY BROADCASTERS
    6× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +77%
  • CG
    COMMON GROUND COLLECTIVE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $30k · revenue +468%

Funded once

  • PL
    PARADISE LITTLE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • HH
    Hope Haven Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Valley Partnership

The Central Valley Partnership (CVP) conducts and collaborates in training initiatives, including community organizer training, education on labor history and issues, messaging workshops, etc., aimed at fostering the establishment of new…

Civil Rights
2
Chico Rescue Mission

to provide recovery services to addicts

Religion
3
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
4
The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce

The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce is a regional chamber formed in 2016 to support a diverse business community that spans nearly forty-five miles and serves the needs of nearly 500,000 visitors each year. As a business…

Community Improvement
5
Community Action Agency of Butte County Inc

To improve the economic security and well-being of low-income residents of Butte County and our surrounding service area through diverse housing, human service programs and community collaborations.

—
6
Valley Vision Inc

To provide for the expansion of the employment base of Nez Perce County, by promoting the benefits of Nez Perce County to businesses and industries throughout the world that may have an interest in conducting operations in Nez Perce County.

—
7
Crisis Pregnancy Center of Tehachapi

To develop and administer programs designed to assist women and men in confronting and dealing with the physical, emotional, economical, social and spiritual difficulties associated with a crisis pregnancy.

Health
8
Central Valley Journalism Collaborative

We grow local news for and from the Valley to help you live a healthy and informed life. We connect Central Valley communities with the support needed to grow and sustain local journalism.

Philanthropy
9
Two Valleys Community Land Trust

The mission of the Two Valleys Community Land Trust is to create, preserve and manage affordable housing in the San Geronimo Valley and beyond.

Housing & Shelter
10
Central Coast Overdose Prevention

CCODP aims to eliminate overdoses and other negative substance-related outcomes in the Tri-County communities and beyond by increasing awareness, reducing stigma, educating the public, improving access to community support services and…

Health
11
Californians to Protect Community Healthcare

To protect business transactions between health care facilities and provider groups with private investors from excessive government overreach in California through public education and advocacy

—
12
Valley Vision

Valley vision is a civic leadership organization dedicated to improving the livability of the sacramento region. through research and action, we collaborate on bold, long-term solutions that improve people's lives.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Golden Valley Community Broadcasters; the most unlike its peers is Public Broadcasting Music Television Pbmtv. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OUR CHILDREN'S EARTH FOUNDATION: $81,500 · OtherOUR CHILDREN'S EARTH FOUNDATIONHOLY SPIRIT HOUSE OF PRAYER: $27,500 · OtherHOLY SPIRIT HOUSE OF PRAYERJESUS PROVIDES DAILY BREAD: $17,000 · OtherJESUS PROVIDES DAILY BREADPARADISE LITTLE LEAGUE: $15,000 · OtherPARADISE LITTLE LEAGUEGOOD SHEPHERD CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $15,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD CATHOLIC SCHOOLECHO RIDGE SEVENTH DAY ADVANTS ELEM: $10,000 · OtherCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $10,000 · OtherAVODAH: $10,000 · OtherDOWNTOWN CHICO BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: $13,660 · OtherDOWNTOWN CHICO BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONCatalyst Domestic Violence Services: $13,000 · OtherCatalyst Domestic Violence ServicesCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $13,000 · Other+3 moreACHIEVE CHARTER SCHOOL OF PARADISE: $56,500 · EducationACHIEVE CHARTE…GOLDEN VALLEY COMMUNITY BROADCASTERS: $38,000 · Arts & CultureGOLDEN VALLEY…PUBLIC BROADCASTING MUSIC TELEVISION PBMTV: $15,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROADC…FROM THE GROUND UP FARMS INC: $44,500 · Public BenefitFROM THE GR…COMMON GROUND COLLECTIVE: $30,000 · Food & NutritionCHARITABLE PARTNERSHIP FUND: $21,044 · PhilanthropyHope Haven Inc: $15,000 · Health
Other$235,660Education$56,500Arts & Culture$53,000Public Benefit$44,500Food & Nutrition$30,000Philanthropy$21,044Health$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACHIEVE CHARTER SCHOOL OF PARADISE: $56,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFROM THE GROUND UP FARMS INC: $44,500 over 6y, 8.9% of budgetGOLDEN VALLEY COMMUNITY BROADCASTERS: $38,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetCOMMON GROUND COLLECTIVE: $30,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetCHARITABLE PARTNERSHIP FUND: $21,044 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING MUSIC TELEVISION PBMTV: $15,000 over 2y, 85% of budgetHope Haven Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDOWNTOWN CHICO BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: $13,660 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCatalyst Domestic Violence Services: $13,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ACHIEVE CHARTER SCHOOL OF PARADISE ↗
  • Who funds FROM THE GROUND UP FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN VALLEY COMMUNITY BROADCASTERS ↗
  • Who funds COMMON GROUND COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds CHARITABLE PARTNERSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING MUSIC TELEVISION PBMTV ↗
  • Who funds Hope Haven Inc ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN CHICO BUSINESS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Catalyst Domestic Violence Services ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

North Valley Communit…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
North Valley Community FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: North Valley Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Enide Allison Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Enide Allison Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Enide Allison’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home