· Private foundation
Enide Allison Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $43k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOLY SPIRIT HOUSE OF PRAYER | $12,500 |
| ECHO RIDGE SEVENTH DAY ADVANTS ELEM | $10,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES | $10,000 |
| AVODAH | $10,000 |
| ACHIEVE CHARTER SCHOOL OF PARADISE | $8,000 |
| FROM THE GROUND UP FARMS | $6,500 |
| OUR CHILDREN'S EARTH FOUNDATION | $6,500 |
| GOLDEN VALLEY COMMUNITY BROADCASTER | $5,000 |
| PUBLIC BROADCASTING MUSIC TV | $5,000 |
| JESUS PROVIDES DAILY BREAD | $5,000 |
| ACHIEVE CHARTER SCHOOL OF PARADISE | $3,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACACHIEVE CHARTER SCHOOL OF PARADISE4× · 2017–2024 · $57k · revenue +193%
- GVGOLDEN VALLEY COMMUNITY BROADCASTERS6× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +77%
- CGCOMMON GROUND COLLECTIVE2× · 2021–2022 · $30k · revenue ×11
Funded once
- PLPARADISE LITTLE LEAGUEone grant, 2022 · $15k
- GSGOOD SHEPHERD CATHOLIC SCHOOLone grant, 2018 · $15k
- HHHope Haven Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +52%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Central Valley Partnership (CVP) conducts and collaborates in training initiatives, including community organizer training, education on labor history and issues, messaging workshops, etc., aimed at fostering the establishment of new…
to provide recovery services to addicts
To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.
The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce is a regional chamber formed in 2016 to support a diverse business community that spans nearly forty-five miles and serves the needs of nearly 500,000 visitors each year. As a business…
To improve the economic security and well-being of low-income residents of Butte County and our surrounding service area through diverse housing, human service programs and community collaborations.
To provide for the expansion of the employment base of Nez Perce County, by promoting the benefits of Nez Perce County to businesses and industries throughout the world that may have an interest in conducting operations in Nez Perce County.
To develop and administer programs designed to assist women and men in confronting and dealing with the physical, emotional, economical, social and spiritual difficulties associated with a crisis pregnancy.
We grow local news for and from the Valley to help you live a healthy and informed life. We connect Central Valley communities with the support needed to grow and sustain local journalism.
The mission of the Two Valleys Community Land Trust is to create, preserve and manage affordable housing in the San Geronimo Valley and beyond.
CCODP aims to eliminate overdoses and other negative substance-related outcomes in the Tri-County communities and beyond by increasing awareness, reducing stigma, educating the public, improving access to community support services and…
To protect business transactions between health care facilities and provider groups with private investors from excessive government overreach in California through public education and advocacy
Valley vision is a civic leadership organization dedicated to improving the livability of the sacramento region. through research and action, we collaborate on bold, long-term solutions that improve people's lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Golden Valley Community Broadcasters and the most unlike its peers is Public Broadcasting Music Television Pbmtv. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ACHIEVE CHARTER SCHOOL OF PARADISE ↗
- Who funds FROM THE GROUND UP FARMS INC ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN VALLEY COMMUNITY BROADCASTERS ↗
- Who funds COMMON GROUND COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds CHARITABLE PARTNERSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING MUSIC TELEVISION PBMTV ↗
- Who funds Hope Haven Inc ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN CHICO BUSINESS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Catalyst Domestic Violence Services ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY ALLIANCE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: North Valley Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Enide Allison Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.