Skip to content

· Private foundation

Engineering Information Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$220k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.3MYouth Development$175kScience & Tech$68kEmployment$39kInternational$35kHealth$31kPhilanthropy$14kEnvironment$5k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $214k
$14,992
Median grant
9
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY$25,000
THE ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF DETROIT$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC$25,000
THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY$24,990
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION$24,988
CORPORACION UNIVERSITARIA MINUTO DE DIOS-UNIMINUTO$21,808
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA COGGIN COLLEGE OF BUSI$14,992
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION$14,934
THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOG$14,560
RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NE$11,680
CORNELL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING$11,157
ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC$5,000
CANDID$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 86% of grant dollars ($1.4M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 14% that went abroad ($221k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 11%University of Arizona: $15k → 15%Springfield Tech Comm Coll SWE Chpt: $15k → 17%Villanova University: $16k → 10%JACOBS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO: $15k → 11%University of California Riverside: $25k → 11%California Polytechnic State Univer: $20k → 12%CA State Polytechnic Univ Pomona: $22k → 14%JAMES OGUNBOR EDUC FOUNDATION: $18k → 9%CORPORACION UNIVERSITARIA MINUTO DE DIOS-UNIMINUTO: $22k → 13%Rochester Institute of Technology: $25k → 14%University of Texas at Austin: $25k → 10%University of TX Arlington: $23k → 11%Texas AM University: $25k → 22%Clemson University: $15k → 16%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA COGGIN COLLEGE OF BUSI: $15k → 14%Florida Polytechnic University: $15k → 16%THE ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $25k → 8%SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $15k → 21%FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY: $25k → 9%University of New Haven: $25k → 12%Savannah State University: $15k → 16%THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY: $25k → 23%PURDUE UNIVERSITY NW: $25k → 15%Bowling Green State University: $20k → 12%Ohio State University: $25k → 15%Cleveland State University: $25k → 17%University of Washington: $15k → 9%Rowan University: $15k → 7%Fairleigh Dickinson University: $25k → 7%Rowan University: $15k → 8%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $15k → 8%University of South Dakota Research: $25k → 9%Morgan State University Foundation: $15k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 15%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $22k → 11%University of Arizona Foundation: $15k → 15%University of California Riverside: $15k → 11%University of Southern California: $25k → 14%JAMES OGUNBOR EDUC FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%Cornell University: $23k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $22k → 10%MERCER UNIVERSITY: $15k → 23%Fairleigh Dickinson University: $15k → 7%COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT -NY: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ND
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 14% of all-years giving ($221k)

8 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Nigeria$50k · 3 grants
Malaysia$48k · 4 grants
Canada$27k · 2 grants
Uganda$25k · 1 grant
Colombia$22k · 1 grant
Spain$21k · 1 grant
Ghana$18k · 1 grant
Brazil$10k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$453k · 13 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
60

Total granted

$453k
$969k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+37%

Still filing today

62%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $174k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementInternationalScience & TechPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Arizona Foundation
    3× · 2018–2024 · $43k · revenue +19%
  • TC
    THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +12%
  • Rochester Institute of Technology
    2× · 2017–2021 · $33k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of California Riverside
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +51%
  • BU
    Busitema University
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
9
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
10
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
11
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
12
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology; the most unlike its peers is Womens Foundation of Arkansas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $92,435 · OtherCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITYUniversity of Texas at Austin: $47,000 · OtherUniversity of California Riverside: $39,557 · Other+53 more: $876,840 · Other+53 moreUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $43,284 · EducationUniversity of Arizona FoundationTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY: $39,989 · EducationTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERS…Fairleigh Dickinson University: $39,650 · EducationFairleigh Dickinson UniversityRochester Institute of Technology: $33,480 · EducationRochester Institute of TechnologyARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationUniversity of Louisville Research Foundation: $25,000 · EducationUniversity of New Haven: $24,944 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA RESEARCH PARK INC: $24,924 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $24,894 · EducationFairfield University: $24,686 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $24,500 · EducationHOPE COLLEGE: $23,311 · EducationCornell University: $22,500 · Education+9 more: $103,981 · Education+9 moreENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS-USAINC: $25,000 · InternationalENGINEERING SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $25,000 · Science & TechGIRLS INC OF THE VALLEY: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentWOMENS FOUNDATION OF ARKANSAS: $10,000 · Community ImprovementCANDID: $4,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,055,832Education$480,143International$25,000Science & Tech$25,000Youth Development$20,000Community Improvement$10,000Philanthropy$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $43,284 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY: $39,989 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFairleigh Dickinson University: $39,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $33,480 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS-USAINC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Louisville Research Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENGINEERING SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAmerican Society for Engineering Education: $24,988 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of New Haven: $24,944 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA RESEARCH PARK INC: $24,924 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $24,894 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFairfield University: $24,686 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $24,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $23,311 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $22,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INC OF THE VALLEY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $15,894 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $14,560 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $10,707 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS FOUNDATION OF ARKANSAS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT: $7,520 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCitrus College Foundation: $5,800 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANDID: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Fairleigh Dickinson University ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS-USAINC ↗
  • Who funds University of Louisville Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds American Society for Engineering Education ↗
  • Who funds University of New Haven ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA RESEARCH PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds Fairfield University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INC OF THE VALLEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Engineering Information Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Engineering Information Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Girls Inc of the Valley: 30% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology: 12% of income from government
  • The Morgan State University Foundation Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University: 2% of income from government
  • University of New Haven: 2% of income from government
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Engineering Information Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Engineering Information Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Engineering Information’s filings →

More from the funding graph