Skip to content

· Private foundation

Engelmann Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$597kInternational$119kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$4,250
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUG O NAY GE SHIG SCHOOL$15,900
CITY OF LONDON ACADEMIES TRUST$13,500
Individual grant recipient$10,227
CINDI'S HOPE$5,400
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR DIRECT INSTRUCTION$5,113
INTEGRATED COLLEGE GLENGORMLEY$4,250
BEAR RIVER CHARTER SCHOOL$3,090
EDUFLEX1 INC$2,500
HEATH LANE ACADEMY$2,227
ST VINCENT'S PRIMARY$2,227
LAUNCESTON PRIMARY SCHOOL$2,227
ENGELMANN-BECKER CORP$1,195
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 74% of grant dollars ($527k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 27% that went abroad ($190k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $153k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EFFECTIVE SCHOOL PRACTICES: $47k → 15%EFFECTIVE SCHOOL PRACTICES: $42k → 15%EFFECTIVE SCHOOL PRACTICES: $23k → 15%EFFECTIVE SCHOOL PRACTICES: $19k → 15%EFFECTIVE SCHOOL PRACTICES: $13k → 15%EFFECTIVE SCHOOL PRACTICES: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
OR
CT
CA
UT
KY
MD
NM
KS
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 27% of all-years giving ($190k)

4 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$177k · 26 grants
Australia$6k · 2 grants
Ireland$4k · 1 grant
Canada$2k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$529k · 15 repeat orgs$186k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
32

Total granted

$529k
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-16%
+86%

Still filing today

40%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    EFFECTIVE SCHOOL PRACTICES RWANDA ENGLISH PROJECT
    6× · 2019–2024 · $153k · 56% of their budget
  • CH
    CINDIS HOPE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $119k · revenue -39%
  • NI
    NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR DIRECT INSTRUCTION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue -65%

Funded once

  • AA
    ARTHUR ACADEMY
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • AG
    AVONBOURNE GIRL'S ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $14k
  • RM
    ROWLETT MIDDLE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alternatives in Education Inc D/B/a Marion Academy

Alternatives in education, inc. d/b/a marion academy is an indiana public charter high school and middle school with a mission to provide students who are not on a traditional academic path with a structured and supportive environment to…

—
2
Carbon Valley Academy

To provide rich content and solid skills instruction in an environment that champions character and personal academic achievement. carbon valley provides a public eduction to students preschool through grade 8.

Education
3
Canon River Stem School

Our mission is to foster each student's innate curiosity and joy of discovery. we preparestudents who are well educated, socially aware, scientifically literate, respectful, andresponsible citizens in the global community.

Education
4
The New American Academy Charter School

The new american academy charter school empowers learners and inspires leaders to make this a better world. through our collaborative teacher teams, mastery-based career ladder, and looping cycles, we offer personalized rigorous…

Education
5
Resolute Academy Inc

Resolute academy's mission is to equip students in grades five through eight with the academic foundation and strength of character necessary to excel in selective high schools and colleges.

—
6
Twin Rivers Charter School

Inspire and prepare students for academic excellence and cultivate responsbile, engaged, and well-rounded citizens.

Education
7
Axiom Christian Classical School

To provide a comprehensive Christian Classical education to grades 1-12.

Education
8
West Ridge Academy Charter School

West Ridge Academy Charter School is a K-8 Public School with the vision to prepare each student with an exemplary educational experience allowing each student to meet his or her highest academic and character potential.

Education
9
Rivers Edge Academy Charter School

Reach offers a holistic approach to student learning where parents have a voice. the vision is achieving academic excellence through personalized insutruction, and parent, teacher & community partnerships.

Education
10
Emblaze Academy Charter School

Through rigorous curriculum and high quality instruction, provided within an invested and ambitious school community, emblaze academy charter school prepares all students in grades five through eight to thrive in high school and graduate…

Education
11
Sonoma Charter School

Sonoma charter school seeks to achieve academic excellence through engaged learning in a setting that involves students, teachers, and parents.

Education
12
Terra Academy

Terra academy focuses on each student as a "unique" whole person in a global society by providing individualized instruction in a community learning model through educational experiences including a broad range of curricular options and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Great Oaks Academy; the most unlike its peers is Effective School Practices Rwanda English Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $38,369 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCINDI'S HOPE: $24,220 · OtherCINDI'S HOPETHE MIDLAND ACADEMIES TRUST: $22,833 · OtherTHE MIDLAND ACADEMIES TRUSTARTHUR ACADEMY: $20,000 · OtherARTHUR ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient: $17,777 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $17,360 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHRIVE COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $17,275 · OtherTHRIVE COMMUNITY SCHOOLBECKFOOT HEATON PRIMARY SCHOOL: $17,078 · OtherBECKFOOT HEATON PRIMARY SCHOOLLEECH LAKE BAND OF OJIBWE: $15,900 · OtherAVONBOURNE GIRL'S ACADEMY: $13,733 · OtherCITY OF LONDON ACADEMIES TRUST: $13,500 · OtherROWLETT MIDDLE SCHOOL: $12,096 · Other+31 more: $87,700 · Other+31 moreEFFECTIVE SCHOOL PRACTICES RWANDA ENGLISH PROJECT: $152,996 · Human ServicesEFFECTIVE SCHOOL PRACTIC…NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR DIRECT INSTRUCTION: $63,641 · EducationNATIONAL INSTITUTE …BEAR RIVER CHARTER SCHOOL: $12,841 · EducationBEAR RIVER CHARTER …THE CANNON BEACH ACADEMY: $11,403 · EducationTHE CANNON BEACH AC…IDEA Public Schools: $7,500 · EducationIDEA Public SchoolsUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $6,600 · EducationLAKE COUNTRY ACADEMY INC: $6,075 · EducationBALTIMORE CURRICULUM PROJECT INC: $5,995 · EducationGREAT OAKS ACADEMY: $5,744 · EducationNEW BEGINNINGS HIGH SCHOOL: $5,415 · EducationCINDIS HOPE INC: $119,150 · HealthCINDIS HOPE INC
Other$317,841Human Services$152,996Education$125,214Health$119,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEFFECTIVE SCHOOL PRACTICES RWANDA ENGLISH PROJECT: $152,996 over 6y, 56% of budgetCINDIS HOPE INC: $119,150 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR DIRECT INSTRUCTION: $63,641 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetBEAR RIVER CHARTER SCHOOL: $12,841 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CANNON BEACH ACADEMY: $11,403 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetIDEA Public Schools: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE COUNTRY ACADEMY INC: $6,075 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBALTIMORE CURRICULUM PROJECT INC: $5,995 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREAT OAKS ACADEMY: $5,744 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS HIGH SCHOOL: $5,415 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EFFECTIVE SCHOOL PRACTICES RWANDA ENGLISH PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CINDIS HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR DIRECT INSTRUCTION ↗
  • Who funds BEAR RIVER CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE CANNON BEACH ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds IDEA Public Schools ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAKE COUNTRY ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE CURRICULUM PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT OAKS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS HIGH SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Engelmann Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Engelmann Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • The Cannon Beach Academy: 8% of income from government
  • New Beginnings High School: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Engelmann Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Engelmann Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Engelmann’s filings →

More from the funding graph