Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Enduring Causes Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20242025.

Religion$41kHuman Services$28kEducation$21kInternational$15kYouth Development$10kCivil Rights$10kSocial Science$10kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$865k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FBCW$15,000
WVU FOUNDATION$11,000
SALVATION ARMY PARKERSBUG$5,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PARKERSBURG$5,000
WOUNDED WARRIORS$5,000
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$5,000
CARDINAL INSTITUTE$5,000
HOLT INTERNATIONAL$2,500
GOSPEL MISSION$2,500
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WV$2,500
THE HOPE EFFECT$2,500
CRU$2,400
MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE HOPE EFFECT: $3k → 11%HOLT INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WV: $3k → 18%THE HOPE EFFECT: $3k → 11%HOLT INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$111k · 10 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$111k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-11%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesEducationReligionYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • F
    FBCW
    2× · 2024–2025 · $36k
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY PARKERSBUG
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k

Funded once

  • WC
    WOOD COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -11%
  • V
    VRIA
    one grant, 2024 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
2
New Road Missions

We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.

Religion
3
World Orphans

World orphans vision is to empower the church to care for orphans and vulnerable families. we equip, inspire, and mobilize the church to care for orphans and vulnerable children. churches engaged. children restored. communities transformed…

4
Chariots for Hope Inc

Chariots for hope shares the hope of christ by loving kenyan children through christian discipleship and long-term physical, emotional, and educational care and provision. the vision of chariots for hope is to create a transformed future…

International
5
Children to Love International

Children to love is focused on meeting the needs of the suffering children of the world, providing help and assistance to empower 'the least of these'(matthew 25:40). through education, spiritual teaching, economic support, physical…

International
6
Holt International Foundation of China

Holt international is a christian organization committed to expressing god's compassion for children while always upholding the highest ethical standards. we: - find and support permanent, loving families for children who are orphaned,…

7
World Without Orphans Global

World without orphans (wwo) global's vision is that every child would grow up in a safe and loving family, know their heavenly father, and reach their god-given purpose. wwo global's mission is to call and equip national leaders to…

International
8
Walnut Grove Christian School

We are a k-12 christian school founded under the following (4) pillars: academics: we provide an amazing accredited academic program utilizing 100% certified teachers. schedule: we provide our students and their families an opportunity on…

Education
9
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
10
Children of the Nations

To provide holistic, christ-centered care for orphaned and destitute children, enabling them to create positive and lasting change in their nations.

Human Services
11
Childcare Worldwide

Childcare Worldwide (CW) transforms children's lives by exposing them to the gospel of Jesus Christ, providing for their physical needs, and sponsoring their education. We connect sponsors with children through Christ-based life centers.…

International
12
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marine Toys for Tots Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Wood County Christian School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
1/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FBCW — $36,000 · OtherFBCWSALVATION ARMY PARKERSBUG — $10,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY PARKERSBUGWOUNDED WARRIORS — $10,000 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIORSCARDINAL INSTITUTE — $10,000 · OtherCARDINAL INSTITUTEGOSPEL MISSION INC — $5,000 · OtherGOSPEL MISSION INC+2 more — $4,900 · Other+2 moreWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $11,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UN…WOOD COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $10,000 · EducationWOOD COUNTY CHRI…HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesHOLT INTER…THE HOPE EFFECT — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOPE E…THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDR…SAMARITAN'S PURSE — $10,000 · ReligionBOYS CLUB OF PARKERSBURG INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $10,000 · Civil RightsMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$75,900Education$21,000Human Services$12,500Religion$10,000Youth Development$10,000Civil Rights$10,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF PARKERSBURG INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWOOD COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOPE EFFECT — $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Enduring Causes Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph