Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Emerald Coast Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$157k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Education$205kAnimals$118kArts & Culture$102kHealth$96kSocial Science$30kReligion$1k
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $145k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$54k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JACKSON HOLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY$40,000
UNIVERSITY OF W FLORIDA FOUNDATION$40,000
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION$40,000
ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER INC$15,000
HOOVER INSTITUTE$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE US$5,000
GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC$4,000
JACKSON HOLE THERAPEUTIC RIDING$2,000
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JACKSON HOLE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASN: $3k → 5%JACKSON HOLE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASN: $3k → 5%JACKSON HOLE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASN: $3k → 5%JACKSON HOLE THERAPEUTIC RIDING: $2k → 5%JACKSON HOLE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASN: $2k → 5%JACKSON HOLE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ASN: $2k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$546k · 13 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$546k
$6k

Still filing today

69%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsEducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $121k · revenue +62%
  • AA
    Animal Adoption Center Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $62k · revenue +111%
  • GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $25k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
2
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
3
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
4
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
5
Jacksonville Humane Society Inc

The jacksonville humane society provides care, comfort and compassion to animals in need while engaging the hearts, hands and minds of our community to bring about an end to the killing of abandoned and orphaned shelter animals.

Animals
6
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
7
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
8
New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.

Animals
9
Juneau Animal Rescue

To serve our community by promoting animal welfare and strengthening the animal-human bond. to improve the lives of pets through education and protection. to shelter stray, abandoned, and surrendered pets and find them loving homes.

Animals
10
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
11
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
12
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alaqua Animal Refuge Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sacred Heart Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF W FLORIDA FOUNDATION — $80,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF W FLORIDA FOUNDATIONJACKSON HOLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $70,000 · OtherJACKSON HOLE HISTORICAL SOCIETYHOOVER INSTITUTE — $30,000 · OtherHOOVER INSTITUTEIndividual grant recipient — $7,000 · Other+5 more — $6,079 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $121,250 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORID…Animal Adoption Center Inc — $61,500 · AnimalsAnimal Adoption Center I…Humane World for Animals Inc — $18,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals…ALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC — $17,000 · AnimalsALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INCBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $14,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCI…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $7,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR…SACRED HEART FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 · HealthSACRED HEART FOU…GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureJACKSON HOLE THERAPEUTIC RIDING — $15,000 · Human Services
Other$193,079Education$121,250Animals$117,500Health$80,000Arts & Culture$25,000Human Services$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $121,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED HEART FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAnimal Adoption Center Inc — $61,500 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetGRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC — $25,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC — $17,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJACKSON HOLE THERAPEUTIC RIDING — $15,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SACRED HEART FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Animal Adoption Center Inc
  • Who funds GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc
  • Who funds ALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC
  • Who funds JACKSON HOLE THERAPEUTIC RIDING
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Emerald Coast Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Emerald Coast Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Emerald Coast Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph