Skip to content

· Private foundation

Em Burger Memorial Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$165k
Granted FY2025still arriving
50
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$450kCommunity Improvement$180kPhilanthropy$83kYouth Development$52kArts & Culture$48kHuman Services$48kHealth$44kScience & Tech$43kOther$0
02FY2025 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k45 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $105k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA R1 HIGH SCHOOL$48,400
UNIVERSITY OF MO - MEAT LAB$22,700
FRIENDS OF THE FINKE$14,000
CHILDCARE VILLAGE$10,000
MU HEALTHCARE - CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
HEART OF MO UNITED WAY$5,000
HENRY COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM$5,000
PARIS SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
CALIFORNIA MIDDLE SCHOOL$3,500
CALIFORNIA RURAL FIRE DEPT$2,500
MISSOURI FARMERS CARE FOUNDATION$2,500
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$2,000
MONITEAU COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,000
GATEWAY INDUSTRIES$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $250 → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $250 → 10%CHILDCARE VILLAGE: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 74 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

74 repeat relationships: 44 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

74
45

Total granted

$1.1M
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+8%

Still filing today

18%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CALIFORNIA PROGRESS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $140k · revenue +40% · 59% of their budget
  • MC
    Moniteau County Nutrition Center
    7× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue +45% · 57% of their budget
  • MF
    MISSOURI FARMERS CARE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • CO
    CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MO
    one grant, 2017 · $29k
  • MC
    MCGIRK COMMUNITY BUILDING ASSN
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • HC
    HOPE CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Blake Wagner Foundation
Human Services
2
Mid Missouri Malamute Rescue
Animals
3
Neosho Memorial Hospital Foundation
—
4
Southern Illinois Hospital Services

Southern Illinois Hospital Services (SIHS) is dedicated to promoting the health and well being of all of the people in the communities we serve. Our mission is guided by our values: compassion, collaboration, quality, stewardship,…

Health
5
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
6
Saint Francis Medical Center

Saint francis medical center is a 306 bed facility serving more than 715,000 people throughout missouri, illinois, kentucky, tennessee, and arkansas. the medical center provides comprehensive inpatient acute care services for medical and…

Health
7
Missouri Centers for Independent Living
—
8
Missouri Humanities Council

Our mission is to enrich lives and strengthen communities by connecting missourians to the people, places, and ideas that shape our society.

Arts & Culture
9
Missouri Dental Association Foundation

The Missouri Dental Association Foundation (the Foundation) is a not-for-profit organization committed to improving and promoting dental health within the State of Missouri. The Foundation deals in the production and distribution of dental…

—
10
Baptist Memorial Hospital-Desoto Inc

Baptist memorial hospital-desoto, inc. provides quality medical health care regardless of race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, or age. its mission is to serve the community with respect to providing health care services and health…

Health
11
Missouri National Guard Foundation

To provide supportive services to veterans of missouri.

Public Benefit
12
Midwest Transplant Network Inc

Saving lives by honoring the gift of organ and tissue donation with dignity and compassion.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri 4-H Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Childcare Village Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALIFORNIA R1 HIGH SCHOOL: $176,698 · OtherCALIFORNIA R1 HIGH SCHOOLCALIFORNIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $83,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFRIENDS OF THE FINKE: $54,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE FINKEUNIVERSITY OF MO - MEAT LAB: $42,700 · OtherJAMESTOWN C1 SCHOOL: $36,400 · OtherCALIFORNIA MIDDLE SCHOOL: $33,050 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI: $32,500 · Other+105 more: $479,678 · Other+105 moreCALIFORNIA PROGRESS INC: $140,000 · Community ImprovementCALIFORNIA PRO…+1 more: $4,500 · Community ImprovementGreat Rivers Council - Boy Scouts of America: $29,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE ELIA WOOD PAEGELOW FOUNDATION: $15,500 · Education+2 more: $900 · EducationRED SLIPPER WARRIOR PROJECT: $5,500 · HealthHAVENHOUSE ST LOUIS: $5,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthChildcare Village Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 · Human ServicesMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Philanthropy
Other$938,026Community Improvement$144,500Youth Development$29,000Education$16,400Health$16,000Human Services$10,500Philanthropy$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA PROGRESS INC: $140,000 over 8y, 59% of budgetGreat Rivers Council - Boy Scouts of America: $29,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMoniteau County Nutrition Center: $17,776 over 7y, 57% of budgetTHE ELIA WOOD PAEGELOW FOUNDATION: $15,500 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetMISSOURI FARMERS CARE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetRED SLIPPER WARRIOR PROJECT: $5,500 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetHAVENHOUSE ST LOUIS: $5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI STATE FAIR FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFood for Morgan County: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL CITY AREA COUNCIL FOR SPECIAL SERVICES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIDING FOR OUR VETERANS: $500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA PINTO BOOSTER CLUB: $400 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMISSOURI 4-H FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CALIFORNIA PROGRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Great Rivers Council - Boy Scouts of America ↗
  • Who funds Moniteau County Nutrition Center ↗
  • Who funds THE ELIA WOOD PAEGELOW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI FARMERS CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Childcare Village Inc ↗
  • Who funds RED SLIPPER WARRIOR PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mfa Oil FoundationMO13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mfa Oil Foundation · Veterans United Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Em Burger Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Em Burger Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 125 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Em Burger Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph