How much did ELUNA grant in FY2024?

ELUNA reported 23 grants totaling $785,022 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

ELUNA

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

ELUNA

The mission of ELUNA is to support children and families impacted by grief or addiction.

$785k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$192k

Largest

01What you fund

0174% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.

Health$906kHuman Services$603kYouth Development$166kCrime & Legal$68kArts & Culture$45kPhilanthropy$16kOther$639k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

camp erin

2020

camp erin

2021

—

2022

camp erin

2023

camp erin

2024

camp erin

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k8 grants · $43k
$10k–50k10 grants · $231k
$50k–250k5 grants · $431k

$21,500

Median grant

States reached

$2.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

CLEMSON UNIVERSITY LEARNING INSTITUTE$192,331
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA$70,287
EAST END COMMUNITY SERVICES$58,502
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER NASHUA$57,002
WESTCARE KENTUCKY$53,000
OAKLAWN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER$34,500
LIFELINE CONNECTIONS$32,500
OVERDOSE LIFELINE$28,250
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF THE SUNCOAST$27,500
COMPASS HEALTH$26,000
WESTCARE GULFCOAST FLORIDA INC$21,750
COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC$21,500
NORTHWESTERN SETTLEMENT INC$18,500
THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE$10,500
PUNT PEDIATRIC CANCER COLLABORATIVE$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $593k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 41% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.3M · 32 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.3M

$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%

+40%

Still filing today

84%

88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

EE
EAST END COMMUNITY SERVICES
6× · 2019–2024 · $174k · revenue +65%
BG
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER NASHUA
7× · 2017–2024 · $166k · revenue +118%
OP
OAKLAWN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER
7× · 2017–2024 · $133k · revenue +27%

Funded once

TP
THE PENN FOUNDATION
2× · 2017–2019 · $12k · revenue +6%
HO
HOSPICE OF WESTERN KENTUCKYgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +40%
KI
KARA INC
2× · 2017–2019 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Serenity Hospice and Home

Patient care and counseling of the terminally ill and their families.

—

Hospice of Hillsdale County Inc

Hospice care to the terminally ill & grief counselling to patients families

—

Hospice of Lake Cumberland Inc

Hospice of lake cumberland offers compassionate care to patients and families struggling to cope with life-threatening illness.

Human Services

Hospice of the Valleys Sc Inc

We foster reverence for life, relief of suffering, and compassion in loss for the terminally ill residents and their families in the communities we serve.

Human Services

Hospicare & Palliative Care Services of

To bring medical expertise and compassionate, respectful, care to people and their loved ones at any stage of a life - threatening illness, and to provide information and education about advanced illness, dying, and bereavement to the…

—

Hospice House Inc

"we give care, comfort, and compassion through and beyond end of life."

Human Services

Hospice of Fulton County Inc

Care during final stage of life

—

Hospice of Northwest Ohio

Hospice of northwest ohio provides specialized medical emotional and spiritual care to people of all ages - and their families - living with any end-stage illness in northwest ohio and southeast michigan

—

Jewish Hospice & Chaplaincy Network

The organization works to ensure that no jewish pateint or family faces terminal illness alone. from the time of a life-limiting diagnosis, the organization helps those it serves gain access to care navigation, spiritual care, life…

Religion

Northland Hospice

We are a team of professionals striving to prepare our patients and families for the end of life experience. we support the patient, family, and friends in facing challenges of a life limiting illness by offering physical, emotional, and…

Human Services

Cedar Valley Hospice Inc

Provide hospice and counseling services to terminally ill patients and their families.

Human Services

Hospice of Wake County Inc

To care for individuals and families with compassion, support, and expertise as they navigate the end of life or life-changing illness.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seasons Hospice Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Fairview Health Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%1/67

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,498

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

60 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

60/60

Grantees still filing

46/60

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$905,768Other$639,485Human Services$603,378Youth Development$166,003Crime & Legal$67,500Arts & Culture$45,000Philanthropy$15,900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New York Life FoundationNY31.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New York Life Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Seattle Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Baird Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ELUNA funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

5get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CAMP MAGIK.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 582568545 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CAMP MAGIK, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 21% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Eluna?

Find your warmest path to Eluna through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ELUNA

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

60 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Eluna?

More from the funding graph

ELUNA

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

60 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Eluna?

More from the funding graph