· Private foundation
Elliott-Coffman Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $5,250 |
| UALR | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| HARBOR CITY CHURCH | $3,000 |
| ACH FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| BENTON PANTHERS DANCE BOOSTERS | $2,200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER | $2,000 |
| CRU | $1,500 |
| HARRISON CHILHOWEE BAPTIST ACADEMY | $1,500 |
| TRAVIS WOOD FOUR BALL INVITATIONAL | $1,100 |
| FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 38% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.
41 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- HCHARBOR CITY CHURCH7× · 2019–2025 · $33k
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SALINE COUNTY6× · 2018–2023 · $26k · revenue +22%
- GCGRAPE CHAPEL CHURCH2× · 2018–2019 · $23k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $14k
- ARARKANSAS RIGHT TO LIFE INCone grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue -17%
- CUCedarville Universityone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +24%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To honor the legacy of Arkansas sports history
To provide each student the highest quality academic, spiritual, social and physical education in an encouraging christian environment.
Business association of newspapers located in arkansas
To promote and develop the growth of tennis.
Provide financial aid & scholarships
Ouachita baptist university is a christ-centered learning community. embracing the liberal arts tradition, the university prepares individuals for ongoing intellectual and spiritual growth, lives of meaningful work, and reasoned engagement…
Educational institution for primary and secondary age students in a non- public christian curriculum and environment
Advocate for educational professionals and unite our members and the state to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.
Christian school
Protect AR Constitution is a grassroots, citizen-led effort to defeat the legislatures referred amendment which would change the threshhold of passage for ballot measures to a 60% super majority. We protect the constitutional rights of…
Fund raising and agency allocations
How this is measured
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 144 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Elliott-Coffman Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elliott-Coffman Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Elliott-Coffman Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Elliott-Coffman Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Elliott-Coffman’s filings →