Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ellen M & Peter M Klein Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$39kEducation$16kHuman Services$14kCivil Rights$12kCommunity Improvement$5kArts & Culture$4kCrime & Legal$4kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$186k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MITTLEMAN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$2,000
TEMPLE B'NAI ABRAHAM$2,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$1,250
UJA OF GREATER METRO WEST$1,000
PORTLAND JEWISH ACADEMY$1,000
LIFT URBAN PORTLAND$500
NATL COUN OF JEWISH WOMEN$500
Individual grant recipient$500
DICKINSON COLLEGE FUND$500
EASTERN PA TRANS EQUITY$500
LGBT CENTER$500
STONE SOUP PDX$500
GAMUT CLASSIC THEATRE GROUP$300
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%EASTERN PA TRANS EQUITY: $500 → 11%STONE SOUP PDX: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$94k · 24 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
4

Total granted

$94k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+70%

Still filing today

21%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalArts & CulturePhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MJ
    MITTLEMAN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +22%
  • PJ
    PORTLAND JEWISH ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +38%
  • RS
    RIVERDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • JG
    JCF GREATER METRO WEST
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • OJ
    OREGON JEWISH MUSEUM AND CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +22%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CENTER FRO TRANSGENDER
    one grant, 2021 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Portland Hillel

To provide programming and support to undergraduate and graduate students in the greater portland, oregon area. to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students in the greater portland, oregon and southwest washington area…

—
2
Portland Public Library

Portland Public Library is a welcoming cultural center that brings people together and connects them with trusted resources, ideas, experiences, and information. We build a stronger community by inspiring learning, creativity, and…

Education
3
Oregon Center for Public Policy

The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…

Employment
4
Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association

Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.

—
5
American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon Inc

We believe that the freedoms of press, speech, assembly, and religion, and the rights to due process, equal protection and privacy, are fundamental to a free people. We advance civil liberties and civil rights by activities that include…

—
6
Portland State University Foundation

Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.

—
7
City Club of Portland

To inform its members and the community in public matters and to arouse in them the realization of the obligations of citizenship.

Community Improvement
8
Oregon Law Foundation

The oregon law foundation builds a fairer legal system and supports justice for all in oregon by:-ensuring access to civil legal help for people with low incomes, or who experience other systemic barriers;-promoting the accessibility of…

Crime & Legal
9
Graduate Employees Union Psu Aft Aa

The graduate employee union is committed to establishing a powerful, democratic, transparent organization of graduate assistants advocating for fair wages, workplace protections, and healthcare. vision: we strive to work with the…

Employment
10
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
11
Basic Rights Oregon

Basic rights oregon will ensure that all lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender oregonians experience equality by building a broad and inclusive politically powerful movement, shifting public opinion, and achieving policy victories.

—
12
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Oregon Inc

The aclu foundation of oregon is dedicated to preserving and defending civil liberties and civil rights.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lawyers' Campaign for Equal Justice; the most unlike its peers is Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE BNAI ABRAHAM: $18,000 · OtherTEMPLE BNAI ABRAHAMMITTLEMAN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $11,000 · OtherMITTLEMAN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERTEMPLE OHEV SHOLOM: $10,800 · OtherTEMPLE OHEV SHOLOMUJA OF GREATER METRO WEST: $5,000 · OtherUJA OF GREATER METRO WESTNATL COUN OF JEWISH WOMEN: $4,500 · OtherNATL COUN OF JEWISH WOMENAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION: $3,500 · OtherDICKINSON COLLEGE FUND: $3,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $3,000 · OtherUJW OF GREATER METRO WEST: $3,000 · Other+15 more: $19,900 · Other+15 morePORTLAND JEWISH ACADEMY: $7,800 · EducationPORTLAND JE…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF…RIVERDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $3,250 · PhilanthropyTHE LAWYERS' CAMPAIGN FOR EQUAL JUSTICE: $2,500 · Crime & LegalURBAN GLEANERS: $1,500 · Food & NutritionEASTERN PA TRANS EQUITY PROJECT INC: $500 · Human ServicesSTONE SOUP PDX: $500 · Human ServicesOREGON JEWISH MUSEUM AND CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$81,700Education$9,800Philanthropy$3,250Crime & Legal$2,500Food & Nutrition$1,500Human Services$1,000Arts & Culture$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMITTLEMAN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $11,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPORTLAND JEWISH ACADEMY: $7,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $3,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LAWYERS' CAMPAIGN FOR EQUAL JUSTICE: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN GLEANERS: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEQUALITY PENNSYLVANIA: $750 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLift Urban Portland: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERN PA TRANS EQUITY PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MITTLEMAN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PORTLAND JEWISH ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds RIVERDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LAWYERS' CAMPAIGN FOR EQUAL JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds URBAN GLEANERS ↗
  • Who funds EQUALITY PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds OREGON JEWISH MUSEUM AND CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds Lift Urban Portland ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN PA TRANS EQUITY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds STONE SOUP PDX ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR19.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Portland · The Holzman Foundation · Jay and Diane Zidell Charitable Foundation · Oregon Jewish Community Foundation · Juan Young Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ellen M & Peter M Klein Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ellen M & Peter M Klein Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Stone Soup Pdx: 20% of income from government
  • Mittleman Jewish Community Center: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ellen M & Peter M Klein’s filings →

More from the funding graph