How much did ELLA O LATHAM - IRR TR grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 64% of ELLA O LATHAM - IRR TR’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k4 grants · $28k
$50k–250k1 grant · $80k

$7,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

MEDSTAR HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE$80,000
NOVA SCRIPTSCENTRAL$7,250
PREVENTION OF BLINDNESS SOCIETY OF$7,000
CHARLES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FDN$7,000
SOME INC$7,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 7%. 57% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$564k · 9 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$564k

$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%

-5%

Still filing today

89%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MH
MEDSTAR HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE
6× · 2020–2025 · $309k · revenue +59%
HOWARD UNIVERSITY
4× · 2020–2023 · $83k · revenue +30%
LC
LA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO
4× · 2020–2023 · $41k · revenue +34%

Funded once

LR
LANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICES INC
one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -5%
AL
ABRAHAM & LAURA LISNER HOME
one grant, 2024 · $9k
VF
VOICES FOR CHILDREN MONTGOMERY INC
one grant, 2024 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Mary Washington Healthcare

Our mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health

Medstar Health Inc

Plan, develop, coordinate, direct and manage an integrated healthcare system.

Health

Baltimore Washington Medical Center Inc

To provide the highest quality healthcare services to the communities we serve.

Health

The Medstar-Georgetown Medical

To provide physical and spiritual comfort to our patients and their families in the jesuit tradition of cura personalis, caring for the whole person.

Health

Marian Clinic Inc

We reveal and foster god's healing love by improving the health of thepeople and communities we serve, especially those who are poor andvulnerable.

—

Washington University Medical Center

To provide and assist its member organizations in providing hospital facilities, physical properties, and programs appropriate for the care and treatment of patients, for the continued on Schedule O

—

Maryland Institute

Degree granting college-maryland institute college of art is a private college (see schedule o)

Education

St Mary Medical Center Inc

St. mary medical center, inc. is committed to providing the highest quality care in the most cost-efficient manner, respecting the dignity of the individual.

Health

St Mary Medical Center

To provide health care and hospital services

Health

Mercy Medical Center

Mercy medical center is a critical access hospital serving a large geographical area. community benefits include: uncompensated care, medical education and awareness, support services, and community outreach.

—

Mercy Medical Center

To care for the sick and enhance the health of the communities we serve, guided by the spirit of the sisters of mercy.

Health

Mcphs University

Mcphs university is a private, accredited educational institution specializing in preparing students for medical careers by providing intensive programs of study in pharmacy and other health sciences.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Miriam's Kitchen and the most unlike its peers is The Howard University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/12

Grantees still filing

10/12

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$391,966Education$83,499Health$76,000Human Services$39,750Food & Nutrition$20,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ELLA O LATHAM - IRR TR funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PREVENTION OF BLINDNESS SOCIETY OF.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~12 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 530204690 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PREVENTION OF BLINDNESS SOCIETY OF, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Ella O Latham - Irr Tr?

Find your warmest path to Ella O Latham - Irr Tr through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ELLA O LATHAM - IRR TR

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Ella O Latham - Irr Tr?

More from the funding graph

ELLA O LATHAM - IRR TR

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Ella O Latham - Irr Tr?

More from the funding graph