Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ella Gayle Hamlin Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$58k
Granted FY2024still arriving
52
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$71kEducation$61kHealth$54kCommunity Improvement$21kHuman Services$17kPublic Benefit$15kFood & Nutrition$14kAnimals$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
11
States reached
$368k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY FDN$5,136
UNIV OF CO AT BOULDER FDN$5,000
SAN JOSE CHAMBER ORCHESTRA$5,000
SAN JOSE SPOTLIGHT$4,000
CHRISTMAS INN THE PARK$3,375
HEALTHIER KIDS FDN$3,000
LATINO COALITION OF SILICON VALLEY$2,550
VALLEY HEALTH FDN$2,500
THE GRATEFUL GARMENT PROJECT$2,200
HISTORY SAN JOSE$2,000
EAST SIDE EDUCATION FDN$2,000
SILICON VALLEY COUNCIL OF NONPROITS$1,480
Individual grant recipient$1,069
SAN JOSE DANCE CO$1,000
CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC IN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YWCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $850 → 8%SUPPLYBANKORG: $30 → 10%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $600 → 8%YWCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $600 → 8%YWCA SILICON VALLEY: $512 → 8%YWCA SILICON VALLEY: $500 → 8%YWCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $500 → 8%THE FOOD DEPOT: $300 → 12%YMCA SILICON VALLEY: $250 → 8%YMCA SILICON VALLEY: $200 → 8%YWCA SILICON VALLEY: $200 → 8%YMCA SILICON VALLEY: $100 → 8%HUNGER AT HOME: $360 → 8%THE GRATEFUL GARMENT PROJECT: $2k → 8%BAYMEC COMMUNITY FDN: $215 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$255k · 68 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

68 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
118

Total granted

$255k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+17%

Still filing today

53%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    San Jose Chamber Orchestra
    8× · 2017–2024 · $46k · revenue +23%
  • HK
    HEALTHIER KIDS FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +12%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CO AT COULDER
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • CF
    CU FOUNDATION - INIVERSITY OF COLORADO BOULDER
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • AA
    AMERICAN ASIAN FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
Santa Cruz Local Inc

Independent nonpartisan newsroom serving Santa Cruz County, California we are all watching and engaged in our local government, our needs are addressed, democracy works better and our community is stronger.

—
4
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
5
Sacramento Region Community Foundation

The Sacramento Region Community Foundation leads, serves, and inspires enduring philanthropy for a just and vibrant Sacramento region.

Philanthropy
6
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
7
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
8
Silicon Valley Social Venture Fund - SV2

Silicon Valley Social Venture Funds (SV2) mission is to unleash the talents and resources of the Bay Area community to achieve meaningful social impact. SV2 works to build the organizational capacity of our Nonprofit Grantees and Impact…

Philanthropy
9
Alliance for Safety and Justice

Just safe's mission is to educate the public about the needs of communities most impacted by crime, violence, and incarceration; and promote new safety solutions through community-building, leadership development, grassroots mobilization,…

Crime & Legal
10
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
11
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
12
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is San Jose News Bureau. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

83 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 83 of the 220 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
82/83
Grantees still filing
57/83
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

San Jose Chamber Orchestra: $45,675 · OtherSan Jose Chamber OrchestraNM SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CO AT BOULDER: $10,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $7,750 · OtherCHRISTMAS IN THE PARK: $9,010 · Other+150 more: $119,711 · Other+150 moreHEALTHIER KIDS FOUNDATION: $31,462 · HealthHEALTHIER KIDS …VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF): $4,500 · HealthVALLEY HEALTH F…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,400 · HealthST JUDE CHILDRE…SCOTT'S HOUSE INC: $2,000 · Health+8 more: $3,320 · Health+8 moreUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $13,136 · EducationSAN JOSE PU…SILICON VALLEY COUNCIL OF NONPROFITS: $5,360 · EducationSILICON VAL…+3 more: $925 · EducationSan Jose News Bureau: $10,996 · Arts & CultureHISTORY SAN JOSE: $2,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $750 · Arts & CultureNew Mexico Performing Arts Society: $700 · Arts & CultureKQED INC: $595 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $1,715 · Arts & CultureASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $8,500 · Human ServicesYWCA GOLDEN GATE SILICON VALLEY: $3,162 · Human ServicesThe Grateful Garment Project: $2,200 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $1,150 · Human Services+3 more: $875 · Human ServicesTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION: $7,600 · AnimalsKINDRED SPIRITS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $1,400 · AnimalsANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO: $1,100 · AnimalsGOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE RESOURCE INC: $900 · Animals+5 more: $1,600 · AnimalsCENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $6,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $5,100 · Food & Nutrition
Other$202,146Health$45,682Education$34,421Arts & Culture$16,756Human Services$15,887Animals$12,600Food & Nutrition$11,100

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSan Jose Chamber Orchestra: $45,675 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetHEALTHIER KIDS FOUNDATION: $31,462 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $13,136 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSan Jose News Bureau: $10,996 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCHRISTMAS IN THE PARK: $9,010 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $8,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $7,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION: $7,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSILICON VALLEY COUNCIL OF NONPROFITS: $5,360 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFeeding America: $5,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF): $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYWCA GOLDEN GATE SILICON VALLEY: $3,162 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Cruz Mountains Wine Growers Association: $2,750 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Grateful Garment Project: $2,200 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSCOTT'S HOUSE INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHISTORY SAN JOSE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKINDRED SPIRITS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $1,400 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetKids In Common: $1,294 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $1,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO: $1,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA CLARA COUNTY ASIAN LAW ALLIANCE: $1,030 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $1,020 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE RESOURCE INC: $900 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKITCHEN ANGELS INC: $800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $755 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Mexico Performing Arts Society: $700 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLIFE TRANSITION MEDITATION CENTER: $600 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $595 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHINE TOGETHER INC: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA CLARA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLUMBUS CITIZENS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHuman Agenda: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMENTOR INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLatino Leadership Alliance: $465 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBay Area Womens Sports Initiative: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHCARE FOR HOMELESS ANIMALS: $400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds San Jose Chamber Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHIER KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds San Jose News Bureau ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTMAS IN THE PARK ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ↗
  • Who funds SILICON VALLEY COUNCIL OF NONPROFITS ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF) ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds YWCA GOLDEN GATE SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds Santa Cruz Mountains Wine Growers Association ↗
  • Who funds The Grateful Garment Project ↗
  • Who funds SCOTT'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORY SAN JOSE ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sobrato Family FoundationCA43.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sobrato Family Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Sunlight Giving · The Applied Materials Foundation · The Heising-Simons Foundation · The Health Trust · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Valley Health Foundation (Vhf) · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ella Gayle Hamlin Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ella Gayle Hamlin Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 220 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ella Gayle Hamlin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph