Skip to content
Elkhart General Hospital Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Elkhart General Hospital Inc

We deliver outstanding care, inspire health, and connect with heart.

$619k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$798kPhilanthropy$467kHuman Services$291kEducation$240kYouth Development$150kCommunity Improvement$78kHousing & Shelter$52kRecreation & Sports$41kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $238,200, the rows itemized in this filing. The $619,064 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $380,864 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $231k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$269M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Horizon Education Alliance Inc$30,000
Elkhart County Health Department$30,000
Ribbon of Hope$25,000
Child & Parent Services$25,000
Maple City Health Care Center Inc$25,000
Indiana Youth Services Association$20,000
Crossroads United Way Inc$20,000
Mental Health Awareness of Michiana$20,000
Center of Healing Hope$15,700
Boys and Girls Club of Greater Goshen Inc$10,000
Economic Development Corp of Elkhart$10,000
Indiana University Foundation IUSM-SB$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $145k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $10k → 13%SPA Women's Ministry Homes: $30k → 13%SPA Women's Ministry Homes: $25k → 13%SPA WOMEN'S MINISTRY HOMES: $20k → 13%Indiana Youth Services Association: $20k → 16%SPA WOMEN'S MINISTRY HOMES: $20k → 13%SPA WOMEN'S MINISTRY HOMES: $20k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 16 repeat orgs$335k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$1.8M
$273k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+2%

Still filing today

88%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RO
    Ribbon of Hope Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $200k · revenue +77%
  • CA
    CHILD AND PARENT SERVICES INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $156k · revenue +7%
  • HE
    HORIZON EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $135k · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • BU
    BETHEL UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue -4%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $32k · revenue -1%
  • US
    U S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -77%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
2
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
3
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
5
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Indiana University Health Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
9
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
10
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
11
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Echo Community Health Care Inc

We provide quality healthcare to all members of our community, including the uninsured, underinsured and homeless. Our comprehensive services are Affordable, Accessible and Appropriate. Our team of professionals is here to care for you and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Newton Park Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
18/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CROSSROADS UNITED WAY INC: $455,000 · OtherCROSSROADS UNITED WAY INCELKHART COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $223,333 · OtherELKHART COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENTCENTER FOR HEALING AND HOPE: $132,100 · OtherCENTER FOR HEALING AND HOPEECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $77,500 · OtherECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF ELKHART COUNTY INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ELKHART CO: $60,000 · Other+14 more: $215,000 · Other+14 moreRibbon of Hope Inc: $200,000 · HealthRibbon of Hope In…Mental Health Awareness of Michiana Inc: $60,000 · HealthMental Health Awa…NORTHERN INDIANA HISPANIC HEALTH COALITION INC: $45,000 · HealthNORTHERN INDIANA …American Heart Association Inc: $20,000 · HealthAmerican Heart As…+1 more: $7,500 · HealthHORIZON EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC: $135,000 · EducationHORIZON EDUCA…ELKHART EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $60,000 · EducationELKHART EDUCA…BETHEL UNIVERSITY INC: $35,000 · EducationBETHEL UNIVER…Indiana University Foundation: $20,000 · EducationIndiana Unive…MICHIANA VEGFEST INC: $15,000 · EducationMICHIANA VEGF…CHILD AND PARENT SERVICES INC: $156,100 · Crime & LegalSPA INC: $115,000 · Human ServicesINDIANA YOUTH SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $10,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $37,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTER FOR HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC: $35,250 · InternationalU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · International
Other$1,162,933Health$332,500Education$265,000Crime & Legal$156,100Human Services$145,000Philanthropy$72,000International$60,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROSSROADS UNITED WAY INC: $455,000 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetRibbon of Hope Inc: $200,000 over 8y, 16% of budgetCHILD AND PARENT SERVICES INC: $156,100 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetHORIZON EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC: $135,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALING AND HOPE: $132,100 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetSPA INC: $115,000 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $77,500 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetMental Health Awareness of Michiana Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetELKHART EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetNORTHERN INDIANA HISPANIC HEALTH COALITION INC: $45,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $37,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC: $35,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTER FOR HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBETHEL UNIVERSITY INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $32,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMAPLE CITY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOSAIC HEALTH AND HEALING ARTS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA YOUTH SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetETHOS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPOTAWATOMI ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetELKHART FESTIVALS INC: $12,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED HEALTH SERVICES OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYWCA NORTH CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ABUSE SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEWTON PARK INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetIndiana University Health Foundation Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Memorial Hospital of …1st Source Bank Found…Crossroads United Way…Lilly Endowment IncUnited Way of St Jose…American Electric Pow…Community Foundation …University of Notre D…Kelly Cares FoundationRex and Alice A Marti…Welter Foundation Inc
Community Foundation of Elkhart County IncIN46× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc · Memorial Hospital of South Bend Inc · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Crossroads United Way Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · United Way of St Joseph County Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Kelly Cares Foundation · Rex and Alice A Martin Foundation Inc · Welter Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elkhart General Hospital Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elkhart General Hospital Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elkhart General Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home