Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elkay Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$49k
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$166kEducation$145kHuman Services$51kHealth$22kReligion$20kHousing & Shelter$15kRecreation & Sports$7kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k29 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$568
Median grant
13
States reached
$540k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA$12,000
American Heart Association$10,000
Ronald McD House$7,500
Gathering of Southeast Wisconsin Inc$3,068
South Mecklenburg Presbyterian Church$2,639
Rock Church Academy$1,055
Capital Area food bank$1,000
The Guest House of Milwaukee Inc$1,000
Wreaths Across America$1,000
St John's Evangelist School$569
Chattanooga Area Food Bank Inc$569
First United Methodist Church$569
Colts Rehab Rescue$569
St Peter's Lutheran Church & School$568
Fuquay-Varina United Methodist Church$568
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Camp Courageous: $527 → 11%Ogden Rescue Mission: $527 → 9%Rolling Hills Progress Center: $527 → 13%Second Story: $527 → 6%Evangelical Child & Family Agency: $426 → 7%Believe in the Children: $426 → 9%Gathering of Southeast Wisconsin Inc: $3k → 17%The Lena Community Trust Fund Inc: $528 → 14%Lena Community Trust Fund Inc: $527 → 14%The Growing Season: $527 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
IA
IN
UT
CO
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$136k · 4 repeat orgs$307k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
139

Total granted

$136k
$279k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+11%

Still filing today

50%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthPublic Safety & DisasterHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA
    3× · 2021–2024 · $117k
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $17k · revenue +16%
  • LC
    LENA COMMUNITY TRUST FUND INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1k · revenue -21%

Funded once

  • E
    Employees
    one grant, 2019 · $118k
  • VO
    Various organizations
    one grant, 2020 · $44k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
2
Cornerhouse

The mission of cornerhouse is to partner with families, communities, and systems - entrusted with the safety of children, youth and vulnerable adults - to reduce trauma and end abuse.

Crime & Legal
3
Reedsburg Area Medical Center

Reedsburg area medical center, always there, going beyond the expected to provide compassionate, quality, and efficient health care.

Health
4
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
5
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
6
Cornerstone Services Inc

The organization seeks to provide residential services for disabled adults and children, as well as behavioral health, regular work and supported employment services for these disabled individuals. additionally, developmental training and…

Human Services
7
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Greater Cincinnati Inc

Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater cincinnati offers a community of compassion, support and the comforts of home to families with critically ill children, steps away from the medical care they need.

Human Services
8
Cap Services Inc

Cap services, inc.'s mission is to transform people and communities to advance social and economic justice.

Human Services
9
Family & Children Services Inc

Family & children services strengthens the safety and well being of children, individuals and families; accomplished by providing a comprehensive program of critical human services.

Human Services
10
Family Promise of the Chippewa Valley Inc

Advocate for and support families who are homeless in our community by providing temporary housing and support services, and by fostering independence.

Human Services
11
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
12
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Penfield Children's Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 172 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
16/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Employees: $118,349 · OtherEmployeesSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA: $117,000 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP AMERICAVarious organizations: $43,662 · OtherVarious organizationsIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+144 more: $103,872 · Other+144 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $16,800 · Health+3 more: $1,453 · HealthGATHERING OF SOUTHEAST WI INC: $3,068 · Human ServicesLENA COMMUNITY TRUST FUND INC: $1,055 · Human ServicesABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC: $527 · Human ServicesCAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA: $527 · Human ServicesTHE GROWING SEASON INC: $527 · Human ServicesROLLING HILLS PROGRESS CENTER INC: $527 · Human ServicesRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $527 · Human ServicesBELIEVE IN THE CHILDREN INC: $426 · Human ServicesEVANGELICAL CHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY: $426 · Human ServicesROCK CHURCH ACADEMY INC: $1,055 · EducationCOUNCIL OAK MONTESSORI SCHOOL LTD: $1,053 · EducationSOUTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $568 · EducationNEW SEALES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $441 · EducationKINDI ACADEMY: $426 · EducationPEMBROKE RESCUE SQUAD INC: $1,659 · Public Safety & DisasterWESLEY CHAPEL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $426 · Public Safety & DisasterCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionChattanooga Area Food Bank Inc: $569 · Food & NutritionThe Guest House of Milwaukee Inc: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterMILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $528 · Housing & Shelter
Other$407,883Health$18,253Human Services$7,610Education$3,543Public Safety & Disaster$2,085Food & Nutrition$1,569Housing & Shelter$1,528

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $16,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGATHERING OF SOUTHEAST WI INC: $3,068 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC: $2,130 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEMBROKE RESCUE SQUAD INC: $1,659 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROCK CHURCH ACADEMY INC: $1,055 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLENA COMMUNITY TRUST FUND INC: $1,055 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCOUNCIL OAK MONTESSORI SCHOOL LTD: $1,053 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWreaths Across America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Guest House of Milwaukee Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChattanooga Area Food Bank Inc: $569 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $568 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $528 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF STEVENS POINT: $528 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC: $527 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA: $527 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK CITY CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $527 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $527 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GROWING SEASON INC: $527 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY CENTER FOR DISABILITY SERVICES: $527 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND AVENUE CLUB INC: $527 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROLLING HILLS PROGRESS CENTER INC: $527 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLES REED ELEMENTARY PTA: $527 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $527 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW SEALES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $441 over 1y, 25% of budgetWOMEN'S BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $426 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELIEVE IN THE CHILDREN INC: $426 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSILVER BIRCH RANCH INC & AFFILIATE: $426 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthside Organizing Committee Inc: $426 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESLEY CHAPEL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $426 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVANGELICAL CHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY: $426 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKINDI ACADEMY: $426 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds GATHERING OF SOUTHEAST WI INC ↗
  • Who funds TRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PEMBROKE RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCK CHURCH ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds LENA COMMUNITY TRUST FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL OAK MONTESSORI SCHOOL LTD ↗
  • Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
  • Who funds The Guest House of Milwaukee Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Chattanooga Area Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County IncWI18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Gardner Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Texas Instruments Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elkay Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elkay Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 172 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elkay Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph