· Private foundation
Elizabeth Parkhill Charitable Trust David Roby & Karin Chamberlaintrustees
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NH COMMUNITY LOAN FUND | $10,000 |
| VERMONT LAND TRUST | $5,000 |
| HANOVER CONSERVANCY | $5,000 |
| UPPER VALLEY TRAILS ALLIANCE | $2,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 61% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- NHNEW HAMPSHIRE COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC6× · 2020–2025 · $58k · revenue +474%
- HCHANOVER CONSERVANCY6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +82%
- UVUPPER VALLEY TRAILS ALLIANCE6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- SCSTART CHANGE INCone grant, 2022 · $10k
THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LANDgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +113%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote trails and greenways and to ensure that people will always have access to the landscape of vermont.
The mission of cooperation vermont community land trust is to reclaim the commons.
Kestrel land trust conserves and cares for forests, farms, and riverways in the connecticut river valley of western massachusetts while nurturing an enduring love of the land
Ensure the future of farming in by putting more farmers more securely on more land in new england and beyond. each year we help thousands of farmers, landowners, professionals and communities navigate the complex challenges of farmland…
Triangle land conservancy (tlc) strives to create a healthier and more vibrant triangle region by safeguarding clean water, protecting natural habitats, supporting local farms, and connecting people with nature through land protection and…
The mission of the green mountain club is to make the vermont mountains play a larger part in the life of the people by protecting and maintaining the long trail system and fostering, through education, the stewardship of vermont's hiking…
To enlist vermont landowners in a long-term commitment to maintain and enhance diverse wildlife habitat and healthy ecosystems.
To build lasting prosperity without sacrificing the quality of life that defines maine.
The mission of connecticut resource conservation & development area, inc. ("ct rc&d") is to enrich local communities by cultivating agricultural viability, conserving natural resources, and growing economies.
We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)
The north east state foresters association (nefa) is the state foresters of maine, new hampshire, vermont and new york cooperating with the usda forest service state and private forestry. nefa was formed in the 1980s and has focused its…
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Elizabeth Parkhill Charitable Trust David Roby & Karin Chamberlaintrustees funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elizabeth Parkhill Charitable Trust David Roby & Karin Chamberlaintrustees. Bigger dots raise more.
- Let's Grow Kids Inc: 100% of income from government
- Vermont Land Trust Inc: 57% of income from government
- Upper Valley Trails Alliance: 4% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Elizabeth Parkhill Charitable Trust David Roby & Karin Chamberlaintrustees?
Find your warmest path to Elizabeth Parkhill Charitable Trust David Roby & Karin Chamberlaintrustees through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.