Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elizabeth J Tellier Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$355k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$466kHuman Services$466kYouth Development$250kAnimals$199kCivil Rights$175kHousing & Shelter$128kPublic Benefit$120kEducation$117kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $204,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $355,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $151,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $190k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Kinship Community Food Center$22,500
Cureaids Foundation Inc$22,500
League of Women Voters of Wisconsin$15,000
Planned Parenthood-Wisconsin$15,000
Three Holy Women Church$15,000
Elmbrook Humane Society$15,000
Journey House$15,000
Marquette University$15,000
META House$15,000
Wellpoint Care Network$15,000
Pathfinders$15,000
Sojourner Truth House$10,000
MADACC$5,000
Bichon & Little Buddies Rescue$3,000
Happy Endings No Kill Cat Shelter$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $263k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%STREET ANGELS: $15k → 17%STREET ANGELS: $8k → 17%LET IT BE US: $15k → 14%LET IT BE US: $15k → 14%PATHFINDERS: $15k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE: $15k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE INC: $15k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE: $15k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE: $10k → 17%PATHFINDERS: $29k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $20k → 17%PATHFINDERS: $17k → 17%PATHFINDERS: $15k → 17%PATHFINDERS: $15k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $15k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $10k → 17%PATHFINDERS: $10k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 29% of Elizabeth J Tellier Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 91% of the giving stays in WI; by stated purpose, 87%.

Elizabeth J Tellier Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 33 repeat orgs$343k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
24

Total granted

$1.9M
$299k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+7%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsYouth DevelopmentHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CUREAIDS FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $173k · revenue +52% · 100% of their budget
  • PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $130k · revenue +104%
  • META HOUSE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $130k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • HA
    HOUSING AUTHORITY CITY OF MILWAUKEE
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • DISCOVERY WORLD LTDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $21k · revenue +213%
  • KC
    Kinship Comm Food
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Groundwork Milwaukee Inc

Bring about the sustained regeneration, improvement, and management of the physical environment by developing community-based partnerships that empower people, businesses, and organizations to promote environmental, economic, and social…

Environment
2
Employ Milwaukee Inc

The mission of employ milwaukee, inc. is to build a strong workforce development system by planning, coordinating, collaborating and monitoring workforce initiatives with businesses, partners and community stakeholders at the local,…

Employment
3
Milwaukee Center for Children and Youth Inc

To end suffering of abused children in milwaukee county through comprehensive advocacy, education, and supportive services that heal trauma, build resilience, nurture the ability to thrive, and create a path toward eradicating the epidemic…

Human Services
4
Milwaukee Development Corporation

-instigate, implement, participate in and promote such activities as shall, in the judgment of mdc, tend to support the general community interest in a strong, vital, aesthetically exciting and economically viable greater milwaukee…

Community Improvement
5
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
6
Wisconsin Meaningful Alternatives Inc

Break down barriers that keep people from living full and meaningful lives. Thr organization does this by building authentic human connections, advocating with the people we support and creating opportunities for holistic and lasting…

Health
7
The Milwaukee Women's Center Inc

The mission of the milwaukee women's center, inc. is to provide innovative, culturally competent holistic care that will empower men, women, and children to live safe, independent, and healthy lives.

Human Services
8
Radio Milwaukee Inc

To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…

Arts & Culture
9
NourishMKE Inc

We're a network of community food centers that specializes in food, love, and community. Hunger is a real problem, and access to food should be a fundamental right. No one should be made to feel they're not deserving of nourishment when…

Food & Nutrition
10
Wisconsin Humane Society

The mission of the Wisconsin Humane Society is to make a difference for animals and the people who love them.

Animals
11
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
12
4th Dimension Sobriety Inc

To provide individuals with a supportive and transformational sober living community that is rooted in the principle that all people deserve to be treated with dignity regardless of circumstance

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Journey House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cureaids Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/33
Grantees still filing
25/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THREE HOLY WOMEN CHURCH: $150,000 · OtherTHREE HOLY WOMEN CHURCHMETA HOUSE INC: $130,000 · OtherMETA HOUSE INCGRAND AVENUE CLUB INC: $120,000 · OtherGRAND AVENUE CLUB INCDISABILITY RIGHTS WISCONSIN INC: $105,000 · OtherDISABILITY RIGHTS WISCONSIN INCWELLPOINT CARE NETWORK INC: $70,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $65,000 · OtherACRE: $60,000 · OtherCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC: $50,000 · Other+37 more: $688,250 · Other+37 morePATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC: $130,490 · Human ServicesPATHFINDERS MILW…JOURNEY HOUSE INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOUSE IN…SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER FAMILY…LET IT BE US: $30,000 · Human ServicesLET IT BE USSTREET ANGELS INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesSTREET ANGELS IN…CUREAIDS FOUNDATION INC: $172,500 · HealthCUREAIDS …PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $15,000 · HealthPLANNED P…ALL 4 KIDZ INC: $74,200 · Youth DevelopmentRUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $40,579 · Youth DevelopmentCenter for Self Sufficiency Inc: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentELMBROOK HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $39,000 · AnimalsBichon and Little Buddies Rescue Inc: $27,000 · AnimalsSPECIALITY PUREBRED CAT RESCUE OF SOUTHEASTERN WI INC: $27,000 · Animals+2 more: $6,000 · AnimalsCOMMON GROUND INC: $48,000 · Community ImprovementGMDA Inc: $15,000 · Community ImprovementKINSHIP MKE INC: $50,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,438,250Human Services$327,990Health$187,500Youth Development$129,779Animals$99,000Community Improvement$63,000Food & Nutrition$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCUREAIDS FOUNDATION INC: $172,500 over 8y, 100% of budgetPATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC: $130,490 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMETA HOUSE INC: $130,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetGRAND AVENUE CLUB INC: $120,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetDISABILITY RIGHTS WISCONSIN INC: $105,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetJOURNEY HOUSE INC: $80,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetALL 4 KIDZ INC: $74,200 over 6y, 25% of budgetWELLPOINT CARE NETWORK INC: $70,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC: $65,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetKINSHIP MKE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON GROUND INC: $48,000 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetBEYOND THE WALLS INC: $41,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetRUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $40,579 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetELMBROOK HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $39,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetLET IT BE US: $30,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetBichon and Little Buddies Rescue Inc: $27,000 over 7y, 5.6% of budgetSPECIALITY PUREBRED CAT RESCUE OF SOUTHEASTERN WI INC: $27,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetSTREET ANGELS INC: $22,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetDISCOVERY WORLD LTD: $21,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Self Sufficiency Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMKE URBAN STABLES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetMarquette University: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetModern Military Association of America: $15,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetWISCONSIN ADOPT A GOLDEN RETRIEVER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $1,031 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMILIES INC: $609 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CUREAIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds META HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND AVENUE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds DISABILITY RIGHTS WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL 4 KIDZ INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLPOINT CARE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KINSHIP MKE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND THE WALLS INC ↗
  • Who funds RUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ELMBROOK HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds LET IT BE US ↗
  • Who funds Bichon and Little Buddies Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPECIALITY PUREBRED CAT RESCUE OF SOUTHEASTERN WI INC ↗
  • Who funds STREET ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY WORLD LTD ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Center for Self Sufficiency Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI30.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · The Ros Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Waukesha County Community Foundation · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Rite-Hite Foundation Inc · Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elizabeth J Tellier Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elizabeth J Tellier Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Elizabeth J Tellier Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Elizabeth J Tellier Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports $507k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2025, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elizabeth J Tellier’s filings →

    More from the funding graph