Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elizabeth Callender King Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$391kEducation$156kHuman Services$144kPhilanthropy$33kAnimals$29kHealth$25kRecreation & Sports$24kHousing & Shelter$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $68k
$5,140
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WINONA AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$20,000
WINONA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$17,500
HIAWATHA VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
WINONA VOLUNTEER SERVICES$10,000
SANDBAR STORY TELLING FESTIVAL$8,500
MN MARINE ART MUSEUM$5,265
READY SET SCHOOL$5,200
PROJECT FINE$5,140
WINONA AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY EDUCATION$5,000
FRIENDS OF WINONA PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,000
WINONA AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS$4,750
GREAT RIVER SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL$4,500
IMPACT CENTER$3,750
INTERNATIONAL OWL CENTER$3,525
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%WINONA VOLUNTEER SERVICES: $20k → 14%WINONA VOLUNTEER SERVICES: $20k → 14%WINONA VOLUNTEER SERVICES: $11k → 14%WINONA VOLUNTEER SERVICES: $10k → 14%WINONA VOLUNTEER SERVICES: $10k → 14%WINONA VOLUNTEER SERVICES: $9k → 14%WINONA VOLUNTEER SERVICES: $6k → 14%WINONA VOLUNTEER SERVICES: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$684k · 26 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
20

Total granted

$684k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-18%

Still filing today

46%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    WINONA VOLUNTEER SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $91k · revenue +48%
  • MM
    MINNESOTA MARINE ART MUSEUM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +130%
  • FR
    FROZEN RIVER FILM FESTIVAL
    7× · 2018–2025 · $42k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • BC
    Buffalo County Land & Trails Trust Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -95%
  • WO
    WINONA OUTDOOR COLLABORATIVE
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue -59%
  • WA
    WINONA AREA COMMUNITY EDUCATION
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Willmar Area Arts Council

To promote and support the arts in willmar and surrounding communities through coordination, communication and collaboration and promotion.

Arts & Culture
2
Willmar Community Theatre Inc

The theatre's mission is to provide affordable, quality performing arts to west central minnesota.

Arts & Culture
3
Red Wing Arts Association

Our mission is to build a vibrant community fueled by the arts. We enrich lives by connecting, celebrating, inspiring, and leading through shared art experiences. Our vision is a community alive with creativity.

Arts & Culture
4
Live Well Winona

Live well winona has a mission to engage the community in a culture of wellness that is distinctively noticeable and results in people that live longer, better lives, and are measurably healthier.

—
5
Northwest Minnesota Arts Council

Support and enhance the development of the arts in northwestern minnesota. facilitate and encourage the creation and appreciation of the arts.

Arts & Culture
6
Waterfront Festival

Increase awareness of the fine arts through films

Arts & Culture
7
Owatonna Arts Center

To enhance knowledge awareness and participation in the visual arts in the community

—
8
Wabeno Area Players
Arts & Culture
9
Twin Rivers Council for the Arts

Advocating and promoting arts and culture as it relates to community and economic development, educating local artists/groups, and connecting the community to more arts and culture opportunities.

Arts & Culture
10
Wenatchee Valley Museum & Cultural Center

To gather, engage, and educate people to celebrate and preserve the history, arts, sciences, and rich diversity of our region.

Arts & Culture
11
White Bear Center for the Arts

To enrich lives by celebrating art, nourish imagination by inspiring creativity, and build understanding by connecting people.

Arts & Culture
12
Winona Area Humane Society

Our mission is to relieve the suffering of and prevent cruelty to animals, and to increase humane education in the winona area.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Winona Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Buffalo County Land & Trails Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
9/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREAT RIVER SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $128,357 · Arts & CultureGREAT RIVER SHAKESPEARE FESTIVALMINNESOTA MARINE ART MUSEUM: $53,102 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA MARINE ART MUSEUMFROZEN RIVER FILM FESTIVAL: $42,420 · Arts & CultureFROZEN RIVER FILM FESTIVALMID WEST MUSIC FEST: $35,625 · Arts & CultureMID WEST MUSIC FESTSANDBAR STORY TELLING FESTIVAL: $28,000 · Arts & CultureSANDBAR STORY TELLING FESTIVALWINONA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,232 · Arts & CultureWINONA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY+3 more: $13,109 · Arts & CultureFAMILY & CHILDREN'S CENTER: $35,000 · OtherFAMILY & CHILDREN'S CENTERWINONA COUNTY HISTORY CENTER: $33,500 · OtherWINONA COUNTY HISTORY CENTERREADY SET SCHOOL: $21,300 · OtherREADY SET SCHOOLFRIENDS OF WINONA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $20,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF WINONA PUBLIC LIBRARYWINONA AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $18,864 · OtherWINONA AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLSHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $15,000 · OtherWINONA HEALTH: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $14,620 · OtherWINONA AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY EDUCATION: $13,000 · OtherWINONA FAMILY YMCA INC: $12,874 · OtherWinona Civic Music Inc: $12,500 · OtherSAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY PAGE SERIES: $12,000 · Other+22 more: $104,202 · Other+22 moreWINONA VOLUNTEER SERVICES INC: $90,798 · Human ServicesWINONA VOLU…WINONA AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationWINONA-DAKOTA UNITY ALLIANCE: $3,750 · EducationWINONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $32,980 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL OWL CENTER: $23,825 · AnimalsEAGLEWATCH INC: $5,000 · AnimalsEngage Winona: $8,000 · Community ImprovementPROJECT FINE: $5,140 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$325,845Other$327,860Human Services$90,798Education$53,750Philanthropy$32,980Animals$28,825Community Improvement$13,140

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREAT RIVER SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $128,357 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetWINONA VOLUNTEER SERVICES INC: $90,798 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetMINNESOTA MARINE ART MUSEUM: $53,102 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetWINONA AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetFROZEN RIVER FILM FESTIVAL: $42,420 over 7y, 7.7% of budgetMID WEST MUSIC FEST: $35,625 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetWINONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $32,980 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSANDBAR STORY TELLING FESTIVAL: $28,000 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetWINONA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,232 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetINTERNATIONAL OWL CENTER: $23,825 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetWINONA FAMILY YMCA INC: $12,874 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWinona Civic Music Inc: $12,500 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetBuffalo County Land & Trails Trust Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetWINONA OUTDOOR COLLABORATIVE: $9,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetEngage Winona: $8,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetTheatre du Mississippi: $6,800 over 2y, 18% of budgetPROJECT FINE: $5,140 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWinona Area Chamber of Commerce: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEAGLEWATCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetArt of the Rural: $4,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHOME AND COMMUNITY OPTIONS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT CENTER: $3,750 over 1y, 4.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREAT RIVER SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds WINONA VOLUNTEER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA MARINE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds WINONA AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FROZEN RIVER FILM FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds MID WEST MUSIC FEST ↗
  • Who funds WINONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SANDBAR STORY TELLING FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds WINONA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL OWL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WINONA FAMILY YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds Winona Civic Music Inc ↗
  • Who funds HIAWATHA VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Buffalo County Land & Trails Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds WINONA OUTDOOR COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds Engage Winona ↗
  • Who funds Theatre du Mississippi ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT FINE ↗
  • Who funds Winona Area Chamber of Commerce ↗
  • Who funds EAGLEWATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Art of the Rural ↗
  • Who funds HOME AND COMMUNITY OPTIONS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Winona Community FoundationMN47.2× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Winona Community Foundation · Winona Foundation The · Slaggie Family Foundation · Southeastern Minnesota Arts Council Inc · Dare Lamberton White & William F White Foundation · Celanese Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · The Gostomski Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Rukavina Family Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elizabeth Callender King Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elizabeth Callender King Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Elizabeth Callender King Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Elizabeth Callender King Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elizabeth Callender King’s filings →

    More from the funding graph