Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elinsky Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2022
15
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$12k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of Elinsky Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Elinsky Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $53k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’19
8
’20
8
’21
10
’22
4
’23
2
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$592kReligion$78kFood & Nutrition$52kHousing & Shelter$52kArts & Culture$48kEducation$38kHealth$5kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2022 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k12 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
N STREET VILLAGE$12,000
TEMPLE RODEF SHALOM$12,000
BREAD FOR THE CITY$12,000
B'NAI ISRAEL$4,917
WAMU 885$2,000
EMANUEL SYNAGOGUE$1,000
US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$1,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF WASHINGTON$1,000
SANDY HOOK PROMISE$1,000
NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE$1,000
ST JUDES RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
INOVA HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,000
SURGICORPS INTERNATIONAL$1,000
BETH EL TEMPLE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CAMP FATIMA OF NEW JERSEY: $500 → 14%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE: $1k → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE: $500 → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE: $500 → 6%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE: $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 70% of Elinsky Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Elinsky Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$268k · 14 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$268k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+36%

Still filing today

43%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionArts & CultureInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    BREAD FOR THE CITY INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $52k · revenue +70%
  • NS
    N STREET VILLAGE INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $52k · revenue +18%
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    5× · 2019–2023 · $46k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +36%
  • LN
    LAURA NORTON FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -81%
  • CF
    Center for Common Groundgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue +687%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
4
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
5
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
6
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
11
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
12
Adventist Healthcare Inc

We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is N Street Village Inc; the most unlike its peers is Laura Norton Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $588,211 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyTEMPLE RODEF SHALOM: $55,968 · OtherTEMPLE RODEF SHALOMN STREET VILLAGE INC: $52,000 · OtherN STREET VILLAGE INCKPMG FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherKPMG FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…B'NAI ISRAEL: $11,005 · OtherB'NAI ISRAEL+15 more: $23,740 · Other+15 moreBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $52,000 · Food & NutritionThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $46,000 · Arts & CultureSURGICORPS INTERNATIONAL: $3,000 · InternationalNORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesCAMP FATIMA OF NEW JERSEY INC: $500 · Human ServicesSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$590,711Other$197,713Food & Nutrition$52,000Arts & Culture$46,000International$3,000Human Services$3,000Crime & Legal$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $588,211 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $52,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetN STREET VILLAGE INC: $52,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $46,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSURGICORPS INTERNATIONAL: $3,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Common Ground: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP FATIMA OF NEW JERSEY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds N STREET VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds SURGICORPS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAURA NORTON FUND ↗
  • Who funds Center for Common Ground ↗
  • Who funds CAMP FATIMA OF NEW JERSEY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elinsky Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elinsky Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Elinsky Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph