Skip to content
Elim Homes Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Elim Homes Inc

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

$872k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$14MHousing & Shelter$1.5MHealth$418kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $60,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $872,343 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $811,843 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$46M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUARDIAN ANGELS OF ELK RIVER INC$23,000
LYNGBLOMSTEN FOUNDATION$15,000
CASSIA$10,000
MORAVIAN CARE FOUNDATION$7,000
BETHESDA FOUNDATION$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $640k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PIONEER HOUSE ASSISTED LIVING INC: $460k → 11%PIONEER HOUSE ASSISTED LIVING INC: $180k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 8 repeat orgs$4.2M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$12M
$4.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+42%

Still filing today

100%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterPhilanthropyReligionHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    ELIM CARE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $8.0M · revenue +36% · 94% of their budget
  • ER
    EVANGELICAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $1.8M · revenue +34%
  • NV
    NEWTON VILLAGE INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $911k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • ES
    ELIM SENIOR HOUSING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1.5M · revenue +27%
  • NH
    NEW HARMONY CARE CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1.1M · revenue +48%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $627k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Elim Homes Inc

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

—
2
Redeemer Residence Inc

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

—
3
Elim Shores Inc

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

—
4
Baptist Home Inc

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

Health
5
Elim Care Inc

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

—
6
Augustana Home of Hastings

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

Health
7
Augustana Care

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

Unclassified
8
Park View Care Center

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

—
9
Augustana Health Care Center of Apple Valley

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

Housing & Shelter
10
Park Terrace Assisted Living Inc

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

Housing & Shelter
11
Brookside Senior Living

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

Housing & Shelter
12
Augustana Chapel View Homes Inc

To foster fullness of life for older adults in the spirit of christ's love.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elim Senior Housing Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community Health Foundation of Wright County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ELIM CARE FOUNDATION: $7,962,618 · OtherELIM CARE FOUNDATIONEVANGELICAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC: $1,825,000 · OtherEVANGELICAL RETIREMENT HOMES INCIndividual grant recipient: $627,212 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+3 more: $120,050 · OtherELIM SENIOR HOUSING INC: $1,500,000 · Housing & ShelterELIM SENIOR HOUSING …NEWTON VILLAGE INC: $911,000 · Housing & ShelterNEWTON VILLAGE INCLAKE RIDGE CARE CENTER OF BUFFALO INC: $550,000 · Housing & ShelterLAKE RIDGE CARE CENT…+2 more: $37,500 · Housing & ShelterNEW HARMONY CARE CENTER INC: $1,099,519 · PhilanthropyLYNGBLOMSTEN FOUNDATION: $74,825 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,668 · PhilanthropyPIONEER HOUSE ASSISTED LIVING INC: $640,000 · Human ServicesCASSIA: $577,500 · ReligionHAVEN HOMES INC: $412,000 · Health
Other$10,534,880Housing & Shelter$2,998,500Philanthropy$1,180,012Human Services$640,000Religion$577,500Health$412,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetELIM CARE FOUNDATION: $7,962,618 over 4y, 94% of budgetEVANGELICAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC: $1,825,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetELIM SENIOR HOUSING INC: $1,500,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetNEW HARMONY CARE CENTER INC: $1,099,519 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetNEWTON VILLAGE INC: $911,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetPIONEER HOUSE ASSISTED LIVING INC: $640,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetCASSIA: $577,500 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetLAKE RIDGE CARE CENTER OF BUFFALO INC: $550,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetHAVEN HOMES INC: $412,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetGUARDIAN ANGELS OF ELK RIVER INC: $85,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetLYNGBLOMSTEN FOUNDATION: $74,825 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCOUNTRY MEADOW OF MILACA INC: $32,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMORAVIAN CARE FOUNDATION: $20,050 over 3y, 9.1% of budgetBETHESDA FOUNDATION OF WILLMAR: $5,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Elim Care FoundationCassiaAmazonsmile Foundation
Elim Care FoundationMN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Elim Care Foundation · Cassia · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elim Homes Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elim Homes Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Elim Homes Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Elim Homes Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elim Homes’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home