Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eli Salig Charitable Trust Elchanan Salig Trustee

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$147kYouth Development$54kHealth$26kEducation$9kInternational$2kEmployment$1kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$619
Median grant
3
States reached
$196k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION ZICHRON METER MOSHI$4,980
YESHIVA KETANA OF LONG ISLAND$625
MAZEL EDUCATIONAL CENTER$619
MISC ORGANIZATIONS UNDER 1000$618
WORD OF MESSIAH MINISTRIES INC$500
KEHILAS BAIS YISROEL$360
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EZRAT CHOILIM HEALTH CENTER: $2k → 14%EZRAT CHOILIM HEALTH CENTER: $2k → 14%EZRAT CHOILIM HEALTH CENTER: $1k → 14%HELEN KELLER SERVICES: $1k → 20%KULANU ACADEMY: $1k → 6%KULANU ACADEMY: $1k → 6%KULANU ACADEMY: $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$210k · 18 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
23

Total granted

$210k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+52%

Still filing today

33%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesHealthInternationalPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CHASDEI DAVID INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +116%
  • CH
    CAMP HASC INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $8k · revenue +48%
  • AH
    AIZER HEALTH INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $5k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • 9E
    929 ENGLISH INC
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue -100%
  • MD
    MANHATTAN DAY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • OU
    ORTHODOX UNION
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
3
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
Ohr Hachaim Hakadosh

To spread the teachings and philosophies of the holy Ohr Hachaim, an eighteenth century Bible Commentator, Talmudist and Kabbalist by making his work available

Religion
6
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
7
Keren Otzar Hachaim Inc

To further religious jewish education for children and young adults in israel both directly, by using advanced education methods, and indirectly, by supporting the development of future teachers by subsidizing their education and training.…

Education
8
Kerem Bais Yaakov Seminary Inc

Kerem bais yaakov seminary is a religious institution with traditional values dedicated to advancing students in classical torah studies while establishing a torah outlook that students can apply to daily life. the curriculum enhances…

Religion
9
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Kolel Zichron Avrohom Inc

Supervision of kosher meal preparation

Religion
11
Hashevaynu Inc

The furthurance of jewish concepts and religious beliefs.

Education
12
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Israel Fund Ltd; the most unlike its peers is 929 English Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISC ORGANIZATIONS UNDER 1000: $54,297 · OtherMISC ORGANIZATIONS UNDER 1000LINCOLN SQUARE SYNAGOGUE INC: $29,010 · OtherLINCOLN SQUARE SYNAGOGUE INCCONGREGATION ZICHRON METER MOSHI: $15,160 · OtherCONGREGATION ZICHRON METER MOSHIEZER LANITZRACH: $10,220 · OtherEZER LANITZRACHYOUNG ISRAEL OF LAWRENCE-CEDARHURST: $9,578 · OtherYOUNG ISRAEL OF LAWRENCE-CEDARHURSTVAAD HARABONIM: $7,800 · OtherYILC: $7,718 · OtherCONGREGATION OHAV SHOLOM: $6,705 · OtherMANHATTAN DAY SCHOOL: $6,000 · Other+20 more: $29,760 · Other+20 moreNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $14,100 · ReligionNATIONAL JEWISH O…929 ENGLISH INC: $12,500 · Religion929 ENGLISH INCCAMP HASC INC: $8,438 · ReligionCAMP HASC INCZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $1,400 · Religion+3 more: $1,800 · ReligionTHE MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES FOUNDATION: $18,500 · HealthSharsheret Inc: $1,000 · HealthCHASDEI DAVID INC: $9,500 · PhilanthropyAIZER HEALTH INC: $4,600 · Human ServicesKULANU ACADEMY INC: $2,860 · Human ServicesHelen Keller Services: $1,000 · Human ServicesKOL HANEARIM INC: $1,000 · InternationalONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $1,000 · InternationalYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $180 · Education
Other$176,248Religion$38,238Health$19,500Philanthropy$9,500Human Services$8,460International$2,000Education$180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES FOUNDATION: $18,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $14,100 over 5y, 0.3% of budget929 ENGLISH INC: $12,500 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCHASDEI DAVID INC: $9,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCAMP HASC INC: $8,438 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAIZER HEALTH INC: $4,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKULANU ACADEMY INC: $2,860 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOL HANEARIM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHelen Keller Services: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORD OF MESSIAH MINISTRIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN ↗
  • Who funds 929 ENGLISH INC ↗
  • Who funds CHASDEI DAVID INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP HASC INC ↗
  • Who funds AIZER HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds KULANU ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
  • Who funds KOL HANEARIM INC ↗
  • Who funds Helen Keller Services ↗
  • Who funds ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY26.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Damar Foundation Inc · Cross River Community Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Hoffen Family Foundation · Tikun Olam Jeff & Shira Eisenberg Foundation Inc · The Goldberg Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Hyman & Ann Arbesfeld Foundation Inc · Ahba Inc · Fjc · The Ojc Fund · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eli Salig Charitable Trust Elchanan Salig Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eli Salig Charitable Trust Elchanan Salig Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eli Salig Charitable Trust Elchanan Salig Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph