Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elden & Mary Lee Gutwein Family Fdn Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$355kInternational$35kEducation$30kFood & Nutrition$19kHousing & Shelter$13kPublic Benefit$12kHuman Services$12kRecreation & Sports$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$3,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$11,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC RELIEF$6,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FRANCESVILLE$4,500
PROJECT AMAZON$4,000
THE UNITED CHURCH OF MOROCCO$4,000
FRIST BABTIST CHRUCH NAPLES$4,000
MALAWI PROJECT INC$3,000
HUMANITARIAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
CAMP TECUMSEH YMCA$2,000
TURNING POINT USA$2,000
ANSWERS IN GENESIS$1,000
FOLDS OF HONOR$1,000
WHITE COUNTY COMM FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CAMP TECUMSEH YMCA: $2k → 9%CAMP TECUMSEH YMCA: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
IN
PA
KY
VA
AZ
NC
SC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$468k · 25 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
5

Total granted

$468k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+92%

Still filing today

36%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionInternationalFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MALAWI PROJECT INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +78%
  • IT
    IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $25k · revenue +208%
  • HD
    HUMANITARIAN DISTRIBUTION CNTR INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $19k · revenue +196%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • IN
    INTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF CREATIVESgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +92%
  • RT
    RIGHT TO LIFE OF NORTH CENTRAL INDI
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Liberty University Inc

Liberty university, inc. is a distinctively christian academic community, with a mission of providing quality collegiate education training champions for christ.

Education
2
Trinity International University

Trinity international university is an institution of higher education that offers both undergraduate and postgraduate degree programs. trinity international university educates men and women for faithful participation in god's redemptive…

Education
3
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
4
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
5
Calvin University

The mission of calvin university is to equip students to think deeply, to act justly, and to live wholeheartedly as christ's agents of renewal in the world.

Education
6
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
7
Trinity Christian College Association

Provide a biblically informed liberal arts education to undergraduate and graduate college students. we strive to offer the highest quality of instruction to prepare students for excellence in further study and careers beyond trinity. all…

Education
8
Great Commission University Inc

Gcu serves the global church by educating mission leaders to fulfill the great commission of jesus christ. gcu accomplishes this mission through a comprehensive program of biblical and general education, christ-centered service and…

Education
9
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
10
Hope International University

The mission of hope international university is to empower students through christian higher education to serve the church and impact the world for christ. the university specializes in fields offering significant influence on society…

Education
11
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
12
Bible Thinker Inc

Bible Thinker, Inc is a ministry dedicated to equipping people to think and live biblically. There are three main areas of teaching that we focus on:1. Teaching accurate theology based on exegeting the text of the Bible and confronting…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Columbia International University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $69,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC: $52,000 · OtherBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTICIndividual grant recipient: $52,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPROJECT AMAZON: $39,000 · OtherPROJECT AMAZONFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FRANCESVILLE: $32,500 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FRANCESVILLETHE UNITED CHURCH OF MOROCCO: $21,500 · OtherTHE UNITED CHURCH OF MOROCCOFIRST BAPTIST CH OF NAPLE: $20,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CH OF NAPLEBILLY BRAHAM EVANGELISTIC RELIEF: $13,500 · Other+14 more: $75,100 · Other+14 moreTHE MALAWI PROJECT INC: $35,000 · InternationalIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationHUMANITARIAN DISTRIBUTION CNTR INC: $19,000 · Food & NutritionLAFAYETTE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING CENTER INC: $13,000 · Housing & ShelterLigonier Ministries Inc: $6,700 · ReligionANSWERS IN GENESIS INC: $4,000 · ReligionYMCA CAMP TECUMSEH INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesINTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF CREATIVES: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$374,600International$35,000Education$27,000Food & Nutrition$19,000Housing & Shelter$13,000Religion$10,700Human Services$3,500Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MALAWI PROJECT INC: $35,000 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANITARIAN DISTRIBUTION CNTR INC: $19,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetLAFAYETTE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING CENTER INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLigonier Ministries Inc: $6,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetANSWERS IN GENESIS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA CAMP TECUMSEH INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF CREATIVES: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MALAWI PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANITARIAN DISTRIBUTION CNTR INC ↗
  • Who funds LAFAYETTE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Ligonier Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANSWERS IN GENESIS INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA CAMP TECUMSEH INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF CREATIVES ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA12.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elden & Mary Lee Gutwein Family Fdn Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elden & Mary Lee Gutwein Family Fdn Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elden & Mary Lee Gutwein Family Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph