Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elaine Stern Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$750k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Youth Development$2.1MArts & Culture$1.1MPhilanthropy$614kEducation$575kHousing & Shelter$461kHealth$310kReligion$300kEmployment$170kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $575k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS$100,000
DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA$75,000
BRILLIANT DETROIT$75,000
HUMBLE DESIGN INC$65,000
DETROIT HORSE POWER$60,000
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY - HILLEL$50,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN - STUDENT LIFE DEVELOPMENT$50,000
BEYOND BASICS$50,000
COLLEGE CAREER AND BEYOND$50,000
WINNING FUTURES$45,000
GESHER HUMAN SERVICES$40,000
RACQUET UP DETROIT$30,000
MOTOWN MUSEUM$25,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN$25,000
BEDS 4 KIDS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JASMYNN'S VOICE INC: $20k → 12%JASMYNN'S VOICE INC: $20k → 12%JASMYNN'S VOICE INC: $20k → 12%JASMYNN'S VOICE INC: $20k → 12%JASMYNN'S VOICE INC: $10k → 12%JASMYNN'S VOICE INC: $10k → 12%JASMYNN'S VOICE INC: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of Elaine Stern Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 88%.

Elaine Stern Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 17 repeat orgs$210k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
4

Total granted

$4.8M
$160k

Still filing today

88%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $775k · revenue +114%
  • MOTOWN HISTORICAL MUSUEM INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $600k · revenue +350%
  • DP
    DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA
    7× · 2019–2025 · $475k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • CC
    COLLEGE CAREER AND BEYOND (FKA MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM)
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • JC
    JACKSON COUNTY INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Employment Solutions Corporation

The mission of desc is to cultivate local workforce talent to align with the needs of the business community through partnerships with key workforce agencies, faith- and community- based organizations, education and training institutions,…

Employment
2
Diploma Equity Project

The organization works with k-12, higher education and other community partners to design and implement programs to improve rates of college persistence and completion.

Education
3
Community Pride Mi
Public Benefit
4
Friends of the Children - Detroit

Friends of the children - detroit has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships and professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Crime & Legal
5
Progressionista

Progressionista serves Detroit girls ages 8-12 with literacy and mentorship programming and provides annually 250 books in total for participants to keep, in-person masterclasses with women professionals, hands-on career projects, and…

Youth Development
6
Mosaic Youth Theatre of Detroit

Empowering young people to maximize their potential through professional performing arts training and the creation of theatrical and musical art that engages, transforms and inspires.

Arts & Culture
7
Matrix Human Services

Inspired by its heritage since 1906, matrix human services advocates for and services the most vulnerable in the metropolitan detroit community and empowers individiuals and families to enhance the quality of their lives and achieve self…

—
8
Urban League of Detroit and Southeastern Michigan

To enable african americans and people in need to reach their full human potential

—
9
Detroit Public Schools Foundation

DPSFs mission is to create and enhance educational opportunities for over 50,000 Detroit Public Schools Community Districts students, families and educators. DPS Foundation was organized to ensure DPS, now DPSCD student and families to…

Education
10
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
11
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
12
Detroit Regional Chamber Foundation Inc

Detroit regional chamber foundation, inc. (the "foundation") is dedicated to growing programs or initiatives that are important to ensuring the detroit region's economy is one of the fastest growing in the u.s.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alternatives for Girls; the most unlike its peers is Jasmynns Voice Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS: $775,000 · Housing & ShelterALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLSHumble Design Inc: $361,000 · Housing & ShelterHumble Design Inc+1 more: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterMOTOWN HISTORICAL MUSUEM INC: $600,000 · Arts & CultureMOTOWN HISTORICAL MUS…DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $475,000 · Arts & CultureDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIABRILLIANT DETROIT: $425,550 · Youth DevelopmentBRILLIANT DETROITTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM: $325,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PR…DETROIT HORSE POWER: $260,000 · Youth DevelopmentDETROIT HORSE POWERCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $604,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FO…KADIMA: $100,000 · OtherKADIMAREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN - STUDENT LIFE DEVELOPMENT: $100,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERS…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $100,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERS…KADIMA MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES: $100,000 · OtherKADIMA MENTAL HEALTH S…COLLEGE CAREER AND BEYOND (FKA MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM): $50,000 · OtherCOLLEGE CAREER AND BEYOND: $50,000 · OtherCONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL: $300,000 · OtherCONGREGATION B'NAI B'R…GESHER HUMAN SERVICES: $170,000 · OtherGESHER HUMAN SERVICESJASMYNNS VOICE INC: $110,000 · OtherJASMYNNS VOICE INC+3 more: $20,000 · OtherBEYOND BASICS: $190,000 · EducationWINNING FUTURES: $180,000 · EducationRACQUET UP DETROIT: $335,000 · Recreation & Sports
Housing & Shelter$1,161,000Arts & Culture$1,075,000Youth Development$1,010,550Philanthropy$604,000Other$1,100,000Education$370,000Recreation & Sports$335,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS: $775,000 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $604,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMOTOWN HISTORICAL MUSUEM INC: $600,000 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $475,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetBRILLIANT DETROIT: $425,550 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetHumble Design Inc: $361,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetRACQUET UP DETROIT: $335,000 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM: $325,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetCONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL: $300,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetDETROIT HORSE POWER: $260,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetBEYOND BASICS: $190,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWINNING FUTURES: $180,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetGESHER HUMAN SERVICES: $170,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJASMYNNS VOICE INC: $110,000 over 7y, 26% of budgetKADIMA: $100,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBEDS 4 KIDS: $25,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetCANTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds MOTOWN HISTORICAL MUSUEM INC ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds BRILLIANT DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds Humble Design Inc ↗
  • Who funds RACQUET UP DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT HORSE POWER ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND BASICS ↗
  • Who funds WINNING FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds GESHER HUMAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds JASMYNNS VOICE INC ↗
  • Who funds KADIMA ↗
  • Who funds BEDS 4 KIDS ↗
  • Who funds CANTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Flagstar Foundation Inc · United Jewish Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · Marvin and Betty Danto Family Foundation · David Kahan Family Foundation · Deroy Testamentary Foundation · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elaine Stern Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elaine Stern Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Elaine Stern Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Elaine Stern Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elaine Stern’s filings →

    More from the funding graph