Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

El-Hibri Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$455k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$350kReligion$325kCommunity Improvement$290kPublic Benefit$250kCivil Rights$230kSocial Science$165kInternational$105kHuman Services$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k19 grants · $275k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FORUM OF YOUNG GLOBAL LEADERS$130,000
DAR AL AYTAM AL ISLAMIYA$50,000
MUSLIM ADVOCATES$25,000
INNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK$25,000
PEW RESEARCH CENTER$25,000
MUSLIM PUBLIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL FOUNDATION$25,000
EMGAGE FOUNDATION INC$25,000
SISTERHOOD OF SALAAM SHALOM$20,000
MUSLIM PUBLIC SERVICE NETWORK$10,000
SHOULDER TO SHOULDER CAMPAIGN CO NATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN AGAINST TORTUR$10,000
AMERICAN LEARNING INSTITUTE FOR MUSLIMS$10,000
ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC & SOCIAL SERVICES$10,000
T OF L INC$10,000
MUSLIM AMERICANS IN PUBLIC SERVICE INCORP SERVICES INC$10,000
ISLAMIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%SISTERHOOD OF SALAAM SHALOM: $20k → 8%ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC & SOCIAL SERVICES: $10k → 21%ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC & SOCIAL SERVICES: $10k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
PA
NJ
CA
VA
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of El-Hibri Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

El-Hibri Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 21 repeat orgs$480k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
12

Total granted

$1.3M
$235k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+10%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsReligionInternationalEducationSocial ScienceArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EF
    Emgage Foundation Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $250k · revenue +127%
  • MP
    MUSLIM PUBLIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $100k · revenue +72%
  • MN
    Multi-Faith Neighbors Network
    4× · 2021–2024 · $65k · revenue +260%

Funded once

  • ZC
    Zaytuna College Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +13%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL POLICY AND UNDERSTANDING
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -31%
  • IR
    ISLAMIC RELIEF USA
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Muslim Instituition

Human Rights Project

Arts & Culture
2
The American Islamic Forum for Democracy

Aifd's mission is to advocate for the preservation of the founding principles of our u.s. constitution, liberty, and freedom, through the separation of mosque and state. public engagement program provides education to the general public on…

International
3
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
4
Muslim Americans in Public Service

MAPS is a national non-partisan, nonprofit network of professionals and organizations that aim to create an enabling ecosystem for Muslim American public servants to thrive both personally and professionally. Our mission is to support the…

Community Improvement
5
Wisdom Islamic Studies and Education Inc
Religion
6
American Interfaith Institute
Religion
7
Center for Islamophobia Studies

The mission of the Center for Islamophobia Studies is to develop a sustained response that both examines the roots of Islamophobia and provides the empirical data to quantify the problem. The Center is focused on developing the tools…

Social Science
8
Minaret of Freedom Institute

Our mission is to our mission is to counter distortions and misconceptions about Islamic beliefs and practice to demonstrate the Islamic origins of modern values like the rule of law and sciences like market economics to advance the status…

Health
9
Foundation for Islamic Scholarship and Teaching
Education
10
Muslim Anti-Racism Collaborative

MuslimARC is an human rights education organization. Our work consists of raising awareness and training Muslim communities on issues of racial justice. In order to uproot racism, we focus on developing and delivering education on…

Civil Rights
11
Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc

The middle east media research institute (memri) explores the middle east through its media, providing timely translations from arabic, farsi, urdu, pashtu, and turkish media and publishing original analysis of political, ideological,…

International
12
Muslims for Progressive Values

Mpv is creating a culture rooted in human rights in muslim societies in the u.s. and around the world.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muslim Advocates and the most unlike its peers is Freshgrass Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Christian Outreach Ministri…Food Pantries and AssistanceJewish Community FederationsPrivate Grantmaking Foundat…Local History MuseumsGovernment Accountability &…Muslim Community Organizati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%4%<5yr14%12%5–10yr18%16%10–20yr18%60%20–35yr16%4%35–55yr15%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr14%11%5–10yr18%28%10–20yr18%53%20–35yr16%4%35–55yr15%4%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
12%
1,600/12,972

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
16/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Dar Al Aytam Al Islamiyah — $145,000 · OtherDar Al Aytam Al IslamiyahTHE FORUM OF YOUNG GLOBAL LEADERS — $130,000 · OtherTHE FORUM OF YOUNG GLOBAL LEADERSDAR AL AYTAM AL ISLAMIYA — $50,000 · OtherDAR AL AYTAM AL ISLAMIYAUniversity of Southern California Sponsored Projects Accounting — $35,000 · OtherMASJID MUHAMMAD INC — $25,000 · OtherARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S — $45,000 · OtherARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND SSISTERHOOD OF SALAAM SHALOM — $40,000 · OtherSISTERHOOD OF SALAAM SHALOMINSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL POLICY AND UNDERSTANDING — $25,000 · Other+15 more — $190,000 · Other+15 moreEmgage Foundation Inc — $250,000 · Public BenefitEmgage Foundati…Zaytuna College Inc — $100,000 · ReligionZaytuna Coll…UNITY PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATION — $50,000 · ReligionUNITY PRODUC…AMERICA INDIVISIBLE — $35,000 · ReligionAMERICA INDI…INTERFAITH AMERICA — $10,000 · ReligionMUSLIM PUBLIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationMUSLIM PUBLI…Islamic Scholarship Fund — $55,000 · EducationIslamic Scho…MUSLIM PUBLIC SERVICE NETWORK — $40,000 · EducationMUSLIM PUBLI…KARAMAH MUSLIM WOMEN LAWYERS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS — $55,000 · Civil RightsKARAMAH MUS…MUSLIM ADVOCATES — $50,000 · Civil RightsMUSLIM ADVO…Muslim Wellness Foundation — $45,000 · Civil RightsMuslim Well…NATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN AGAINST TORTURE — $30,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL RE…THE SIKH COALITION — $10,000 · Civil RightsAmerican Learning Institute for Muslims — $95,000 · Social ScienceAmerican L…THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $45,000 · Social ScienceTHE ASPEN …Pew Research Center — $25,000 · Social SciencePew Resear…INNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK — $95,000 · Community ImprovementINNER-CIT…Multi-Faith Neighbors Network — $65,000 · Community ImprovementMulti-Fai…
Other$685,000Public Benefit$250,000Religion$195,000Education$195,000Civil Rights$190,000Social Science$165,000Community Improvement$160,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEmgage Foundation Inc — $250,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetZaytuna College Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMUSLIM PUBLIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetINNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK — $95,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Learning Institute for Muslims — $95,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetMulti-Faith Neighbors Network — $65,000 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetKARAMAH MUSLIM WOMEN LAWYERS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS — $55,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetIslamic Scholarship Fund — $55,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetMUSLIM ADVOCATES — $50,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetUNITY PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND S — $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMuslim Wellness Foundation — $45,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetMUSLIM PUBLIC SERVICE NETWORK — $40,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetSISTERHOOD OF SALAAM SHALOM — $40,000 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetAMERICA INDIVISIBLE — $35,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetNATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN AGAINST TORTURE — $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPew Research Center — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL POLICY AND UNDERSTANDING — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUHAMMAD ALI MUSEUM AND EDUCATION CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINTERFAITH AMERICA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetT OF L INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SIKH COALITION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sterling Charitable Gift FundVA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sterling Charitable Gift Fund · Proteus Fund Inc · Pillars Fund · American Muslim Community Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Ford Foundation · Doris Duke Foundation for Islamic Art · Barzinji Family Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization El-Hibri Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to El-Hibri Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to El-Hibri Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph