Skip to content

· Private foundation

El Deseo Foundation El Deseo Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2021
8
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$5k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

56% of El Deseo Foundation El Deseo Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Nature Conservancy, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year El Deseo Foundation El Deseo Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $26k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
8
’18
6
’19
7
’20
6
’21
5
’22
5
’23
2
’24
4
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$170kFood & Nutrition$68kArts & Culture$45kAnimals$41kEducation$31kRecreation & Sports$26kInternational$25kHuman Services$15kOther$0
02FY2021 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$831k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER$5,000
THE FOOD DEPOT$5,000
BRECKENRIDGE ARTS DISTRICT$5,000
SANTA FE BOTANICAL GARDEN$2,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$2,500
SOUTH BEND TABLE TENNIS$2,000
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$2,000
KITCHEN ANGELS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%CHRISTMAS UNLIMITED: $15k → 9%THE FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
IN
CO
AZ
NM
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$256k · 13 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2021, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
13

Total granted

$256k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+20%

Still filing today

54%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationInternationalAnimalsArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE FOOD DEPOT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +84%
  • SF
    SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +36%
  • KA
    KITCHEN ANGELS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • CU
    CHRISTMAS UNLIMITED INC
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +20%
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +79%
  • UP
    USATT PARA PROGRAM
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
3
Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum

We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.

Arts & Culture
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
5
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
6
Roadrunner Food Bank Inc

To feed every hungry person today, to seed partnerships that build self- sufficiency for tomorrow, and lead to achieve our vision of permanently ending hunger in new mexico.

Food & Nutrition
7
Cooking With Kids Inc

Cooking with kids educates and empowers children and families to make healthy food choices through hands-on nutrition education with fresh, affordable foods.

Youth Development
8
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
9
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
10
Nmc Inc

New mexico consortium (nmc) integrates the needs of new mexico's research universities to build liason research between local universities and organizations. nmc builds strategic connections with scientific institutions throughout the…

Education
11
Reunity Resources

To provide education and promote the use of recycling, sustainable practices alternative energy and community resources for the betterment of the environment and public at large.

Environment
12
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches; the most unlike its peers is Christmas Unlimited Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $162,500 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYBRECKENRIDGE ARTS DISTRICT: $40,000 · OtherBRECKENRIDGE ARTS DISTRICTKITCHEN ANGELS INC: $23,000 · OtherKITCHEN ANGELS INCIndividual grant recipient: $20,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOUTH BEND TABLE TENNIS: $13,000 · Other+14 more: $32,900 · Other+14 moreTHE FOOD DEPOT: $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOTCHRISTMAS UNLIMITED INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTMAS UNLIM…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $39,500 · AnimalsSANTA FE …Cornell University: $20,000 · EducationLittle Earth School Inc: $10,500 · EducationMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,000 · InternationalSANTA FE BOTANICAL GARDEN: $7,500 · EnvironmentMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$291,900Human Services$61,000Animals$39,500Education$30,500International$21,000Environment$7,500Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $162,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $39,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKITCHEN ANGELS INC: $23,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCornell University: $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Earth School Inc: $10,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSANTA FE BOTANICAL GARDEN: $7,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELCHAIR SPORTS FEDERATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds KITCHEN ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTMAS UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Little Earth School Inc ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELCHAIR SPORTS FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization El Deseo Foundation El Deseo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from El Deseo Foundation El Deseo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on El Deseo Foundation El Deseo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph