Skip to content
Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
145
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$342k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0165% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$3.7MPhilanthropy$683kHuman Services$421kInternational$137kFood & Nutrition$44kHealth$38kEducation$29kEnvironment$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 145 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k130 grants · $180k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $149k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $348k
  • $250k+2 grants · $638k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADIREI HATORAH$342,000
CHASDEI MEIR$295,500
Individual grant recipient$100,000
NEVE YERUSHALAYIM$75,000
MACHON HARAV SHACH INC$63,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLEL SHAREI SIMCHA$60,000
THE OJC FUND$50,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHEV YISROEL$36,000
CONG SUPPORTERS OF TORAH$30,000
MERCAZ HATORAH OF BELLE HARBOR$19,700
KHAL ZICHRON MORDECHAI$16,800
CONG KHAL SASREGEN SOKOLOV$12,500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YEMIN$12,000
YESHIVA OHR HAMEIR$11,300
KHAL BAIS YITZCHOCK$11,050
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $338k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND: $500 → 17%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $2k → 11%BAIS CHESED: $500 → 14%NER MALKA: $5k → 14%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON VKALLAH: $5k → 20%BLEV ECHOD: $18k → 17%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON VKALLAH: $2k → 20%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $1k → 6%NER MALKA: $1k → 14%TEN YAD KALLA GMACH INC: $500 → 20%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON VKALLAH: $360 → 20%NER MALKA: $1k → 14%GEMACH ABG: $1k → 11%CHAI4EVER: $540 → 11%CHAI 4 EVER: $500 → 11%OORAH: $100 → 11%CHAI4EVER: $100 → 11%OORAH: $100 → 11%CHAI 4 EVER: $100 → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $10k → 20%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $1k → 20%MY EXSTENDED FAMILY: $500 → 20%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $180 → 20%FRIENDS OF KETER TORAH: $7k → 20%A TIME: $1k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY: $271k → 20%KEREN ANIYIM: $5k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $1k → 20%A TIME: $200 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $360 → 20%A TIME: $180 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $200 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $180 → 20%A TIME: $180 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $180 → 20%BOBBIES PLACE: $100 → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP: $100 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 179 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

179 repeat relationships: 89 still active in FY2024, 90 since wound down; 55 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

179
249

Total granted

$4.0M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+20%

Still filing today

19%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $199k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CHASDEI MEIR INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $542k · revenue +43% · 28% of their budget
  • MH
    MACHON HARAV SHACH INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $332k · revenue +13%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLEL SHAAREI SIMCHA
    3× · 2022–2024 · $170k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • AY
    AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $271k · revenue -20%
  • CB
    CONG BNOS DEVORAH INC
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
  • CA
    CONG AHAVAS CHESED USA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $165k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
4
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
5
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
6
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
7
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Sherit Isroel
—
9
Rashbi Tehillim Incorporated
Religion
10
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
11
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
12
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is Camp Extreme D/B/a Project Extreme. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

94 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 94 of the 485 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
91/94
Grantees still filing
57/94
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF AMERICA: $392,000 · OtherBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF AMERICACONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC: $349,092 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INCSAR SHALOM INC: $255,720 · OtherSAR SHALOM INCCONG BNOS DEVORAH INC: $200,000 · OtherCONG AHAVAS CHESED USA INC: $165,000 · Other+158 more: $2,585,481 · Other+158 moreCHASDEI MEIR INC: $541,500 · PhilanthropyCHASDEI ME…+2 more: $6,040 · PhilanthropyMACHON HARAV SHACH INC: $332,000 · ReligionMACHON HAR…CHAYIM V CHESED: $80,500 · ReligionCHAYIM V C…GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC: $60,200 · ReligionGATEWAYS O…+11 more: $54,980 · Religion+11 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLEL SHAAREI SIMCHA: $170,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $100,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YEMIN INC: $60,000 · InternationalAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $271,000 · Human ServicesBELEV ECHAD INC: $18,000 · Human Services+7 more: $40,560 · Human ServicesTHE OJC FUND: $100,000 · EducationYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $15,710 · EducationYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $7,860 · EducationSHALVA HIGH SCHOOL INC: $6,100 · EducationReb Shayalas Kitchen: $26,500 · Food & NutritionREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $3,600 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,900 · HealthKEREN EZER LNEFESH: $2,360 · Health
Other$3,947,293Philanthropy$547,540Religion$527,680International$330,000Human Services$329,560Education$129,670Food & Nutrition$26,500Health$8,860

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHASDEI MEIR INC: $541,500 over 2y, 28% of budgetMACHON HARAV SHACH INC: $332,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $271,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLEL SHAAREI SIMCHA: $170,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF NEVE COLLEGE FOR WOMEN INC: $120,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetTHE OJC FUND: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHAYIM V CHESED: $80,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC: $60,200 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YEMIN INC: $60,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetReb Shayalas Kitchen: $26,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN'S LEAGUE COMMUNITY RESIDENCES: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELEV ECHAD INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetZICHRON YEHUDA FUND: $16,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $15,710 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA IMREI BINA INC: $15,700 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $7,860 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKeren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah: $7,220 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF KETER TORAH INC: $7,200 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNER MALKA INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSHALVA HIGH SCHOOL INC: $6,100 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMONMOUTH TORAH LINKS INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetOHR NAAVA: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYAM SHLOMO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLEV BEREL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN ANIYIM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetALEPH BEIS GIMMEL INC: $3,800 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSHUVU RETURN INC: $3,740 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHEVRAS SHABBOS KODESH PODCAST FELLOWSHIP: $3,600 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTZIDKAS HILLEL INC: $2,800 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCHABAD OF CORAL WAY INC: $2,680 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetITS GOOD TO KNOW: $2,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN EZER LNEFESH: $2,360 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE YAD LELEV FOUNDATION INC: $2,300 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $2,140 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHASDEI MEIR INC ↗
  • Who funds MACHON HARAV SHACH INC ↗
  • Who funds AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLEL SHAAREI SIMCHA ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NEVE COLLEGE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OJC FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAYIM V CHESED ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YEMIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Reb Shayalas Kitchen ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…The Jmg FoundationJsw FoundationThe Ezra Charitable T…Zichron Yechiel Meche…The Fishoff Family Fo…National Society for …Jewish Communal FundThe Basch Family Foun…The Jimmy and Berta K…Zichron Chaim Charity…
The Ojc FundNY90.9× affinity117 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Jmg Foundation · Jsw Foundation · The Ezra Charitable Trust · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · The Fishoff Family Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Jewish Communal Fund · The Basch Family Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 210%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Bais Tova Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Bnos Esther Malka Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Heichal Hatorah: 1% of income from government
  • Oorah Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
21get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 485 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eisenberg Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home