Skip to content
Einhorn Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Einhorn Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$210k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

95% of Einhorn Family Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Bradley Impact Fund Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

17
’17
16
’18
6
’19
0
’20
0
’21
0
’22
0
’23
0
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.6MArts & Culture$191kEducation$119kPublic Benefit$23kInternational$10kHuman Services$7kSocial Science$5kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$200,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$776k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRADLEY IMPACT FUND$200,000
AM COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 17%BRUCE GUADALUPE COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $5k → 17%BRUCE GUADALUPE COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $5k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN INC: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
PA
RI
CO
VA
AR
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$310k · 20 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
17

Total granted

$310k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+46%

Still filing today

60%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitCrime & LegalInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $150k · revenue +5%
  • TF
    THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $55k · revenue +3%
  • UC
    UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +91%
  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +967%
  • GI
    GATESTONE INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
2
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
3
Lawrence University of Wisconsin

Lawrence university of wisconsin, through its undergraduate residential college and conservatory of music, educates students in the liberal arts and sciences. the university is devoted to excellence and integrity in all of its activities…

Education
4
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
5
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
6
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Cleveland Institute of Music

The cleveland institute of music's mission is to empower the world's most talented classical music students to fulfill their dreams and potential.

Education
9
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
10
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
11
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Stage Milwaukee; the most unlike its peers is In Tandem Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRADLEY IMPACT FUND INC: $1,635,000 · PhilanthropyBRADLEY IMPACT FUND INC+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC: $150,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE…MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE…+5 more: $11,000 · Arts & Culture+5 moreTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $55,000 · OtherST MARCUS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherNEXT ACT THEATER: $15,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INC: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · Other+17 more: $39,850 · OtherUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesHEAR Wisconsin Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesGATESTONE INSTITUTE: $5,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $3,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $3,000 · EducationSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $2,000 · EducationTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · EducationCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $10,000 · InternationalCATO INSTITUTE: $2,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Public Benefit
Philanthropy$1,645,000Arts & Culture$171,000Other$155,850Human Services$16,000Education$15,000International$10,000Public Benefit$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRADLEY IMPACT FUND INC: $1,635,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetMILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $55,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGATESTONE INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIN TANDEM THEATRE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE CHAMBER THEATRE LTD: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEAR Wisconsin Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEGAL INSURRECTION FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gardner FoundationEvan & Marion Helfaer…Herbert H Kohl Charit…Greater Milwaukee Fou…Peck Foundation Milwa…Richard and Ethel Her…Bert L and Patricia S…Anon Charitable TrustThe Lynde and Harry B…Milwaukee Jewish Fede…Bradley Impact Fund I…Baird Foundation Inc
Gardner FoundationWI24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gardner Foundation · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Peck Foundation Milwaukee Ltd · Richard and Ethel Herzfeld Foundation Inc · Bert L and Patricia S Steigleder Charitable · Anon Charitable Trust · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Baird Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Einhorn Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Einhorn Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Einhorn Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home