Loading…
· Private foundation
EINHORN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$220k
Granted FY2024
1
Grants
1
Communities
$220k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Philanthropy$1.4MEducation$15kArts & Culture$11kHuman Services$6kPublic Benefit$4kCrime & Legal$2kCivil Rights$1kOther$333k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
gereralchildren'smilwaukeetheater
2019
—
2020
—
2021
—
2022
—
2023
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$220,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
- BRADLEY IMPACT FUND$220,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 22 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else
22 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
22
19
Total granted
$1.7M
$64k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+48%
+57%
Still filing today
41%
42%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BRADLEY IMPACT FUND8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +1028%- TFTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES2× · 2017–2018 · $55k · revenue +40%
MILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART AND DESIGN2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- GMGREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $10k
MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATERgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +99%- TPTURNING POINT USAone grant, 2018 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Contemporary Policy Institute
Philanthropy
2
Institute of Politics Policy and History
Education
3
Lake Forest College
Lake Forest College is a National Residential Liberal Arts College, accredited by the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools.
Education
4
Columbia College Chicago
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
Education
5
Gruter Institute for Law and
—
6
Fisk University
Fisk university produces graduates from diverse backgrounds with the integrity and intellect required for substantive contributions to society.
Education
7
Boston Architectural College
Founded 131 years ago, the boston architectural college is a recognized institution providing excellence in practice-integrated design education to members of diverse communities with students representing 35 countries. the bac offers…
—
8
University of Chicago
The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.
Education
9
American Law Institute
The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…
Crime & Legal
10
The University of the Arts
Advancing human creativity by educating interdisciplinary artists, performers, makers, & writers.
Education
11
Westminster College
Four-year, undergraduate liberal arts college.
Education
12
Westminster University
Offer undergraduate and graduate degrees in liberal arts and professional programs.
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Uwm Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Philanthropy$1,435,000Other$332,850Education$15,000Arts & Culture$11,000Human Services$6,000Public Benefit$4,000Crime & Legal$2,000Civil Rights$1,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BRADLEY IMPACT FUND ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART AND DESIGN ↗
- Who funds GATESTONE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER ↗
- Who funds HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UWM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY ↗
- Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds LEGAL INSURRECTION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEAR WISCONSIN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Baird Foundation Inc · National Center for Housing Management · Gardner Foundation · Anon Charitable Trust · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation EINHORN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BRADLEY IMPACT FUND.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 11.3× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 454678325 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on BRADLEY IMPACT FUND, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Einhorn Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Einhorn Family Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines