Skip to content

· Private foundation

Egide Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$333k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$692kHealth$684kCommunity Improvement$329kEducation$66kArts & Culture$59kMembership Benefit$40kRecreation & Sports$38kPublic Safety & Disaster$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSONS RESEARCH$100,000
MAUI HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,000
BAY AREA WOMEN LEADERS NETWORK$25,000
MARK DAY SCHOOL$20,000
MARK DAY SCHOOL$15,000
VITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC$10,000
CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION$10,000
STEM MARIN FUND$10,000
MAUI HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$10,000
MARTIS CAMP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
MAUI ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER$10,000
THE V FOUNDATION$10,000
MARIN ATHLETIC FOUNDATION$5,000
OKIZU FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $326k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BAY AREA WOMEN LEADERS NETWORK: $100k → 8%BAY AREA WOMEN LEADER NETWORK: $50k → 8%BAY AREA WOMEN LEADERS NETWORK: $50k → 8%BAY AREA WOMEN LEADER NETWORK: $13k → 8%BAY AREA WOMEN LEADERS NETWORK: $10k → 8%BAY AREA WOMEN LEADERS NETWORK: $50k → 10%BAY AREA WOMEN LEADERS NETWORK: $25k → 10%BAY AREA WOMEN LEADER NETWORK: $10k → 8%BAY AREA WOMEN LEADERS NETWORK: $7k → 10%BAY AREA WOMEN LEADERS NETWORK: $5k → 10%BAY AREA WOMEN LEADERS NETWORK: $2k → 10%BAY AREA WOMEN LEADERS NETWORK: $3k → 8%BAY AREA WOMEN LEADERS NETWORK: $1k → 8%HOSPICE MAUI INC: $500 → 9%SPARKLE FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NV
PA
NJ
CA
KY
TN
NC
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 26 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
19

Total granted

$1.9M
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+29%

Still filing today

88%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $655k · revenue +33%
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    6× · 2019–2024 · $370k · revenue +338%
  • BA
    BAY AREA WOMEN LEADER NETWORK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $325k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • CI
    CRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES DBA SIERRA COMMUNITY HOUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +29%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +29%
  • E
    Extrafoodgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +956%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
Marin Community Foundation

Mobilizing the power of community and the resources of philanthropy to advance equity for people, places and the planet.

Philanthropy
6
Silent Spring Institute Inc

Silent spring institute is dedicated to advancing science on the influence of environmental chemicals on women's health, with a focus on breast cancer prevention.

Health
7
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
8
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Women's Foundation of California

Women's foundation of california amplifies the voices and experiences of community leaders, redistributes knowledge, power, and resources, and mobilizes communities and funders to advance justice for all.

—
10
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
11
Ucsf Health Medical Foundation

See schedule othe mission of ucsf health medical foundation is threefold: 1) to establish, operate and maintain medical clinics for the provision of healthcare services in california; 2) to promote health by providing, coordinating,…

Health
12
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crisis Intervention Services Dba Sierra Community House; the most unlike its peers is San Marin High School All Sports Booster Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
37/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC: $655,000 · InternationalVITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC+2 more: $13,500 · InternationalTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $370,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARK…MAUI HEALTH FOUNDATION: $139,273 · HealthMAUI HEALTH FOUNDATIONTHE V FOUNDATION: $80,000 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATIONPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $37,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMER…+7 more: $32,000 · HealthBAY AREA WOMEN LEADER NETWORK: $325,000 · Human ServicesBAY AREA WOMEN LEA…+3 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesMARK DAY SCHOOL: $56,000 · OtherMARK DAY …OKIZU FOUNDATION: $12,500 · OtherOKIZU FOU…E Cobb: $10,000 · OtherE CobbMARTIS CAMP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION DBA MARTIS CAMP FOUNDATION: $30,500 · OtherMARTIS CA…MAUI FOOD BANK INC: $11,000 · OtherMAUI FOOD…BUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING: $12,000 · OtherBUCK INST…+20 more: $40,500 · Other+20 moreCALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE: $45,000 · Arts & CultureMAUI ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER: $12,000 · Arts & CultureSHE-CAN GLOBAL INC: $35,000 · EducationSTEM MARIN FUND: $10,000 · EducationMARIN ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationSan Marin High School Music Boosters: $2,000 · EducationCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $40,200 · Membership Benefit
International$668,500Health$658,273Human Services$328,000Other$172,500Arts & Culture$57,000Education$52,000Membership Benefit$40,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC: $655,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $370,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBAY AREA WOMEN LEADER NETWORK: $325,000 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetMAUI HEALTH FOUNDATION: $139,273 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMARK DAY SCHOOL: $56,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE: $45,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $40,200 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $37,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHE-CAN GLOBAL INC: $35,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetMARTIS CAMP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION DBA MARTIS CAMP FOUNDATION: $30,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetOKIZU FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTO CELEBRATE LIFE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBREASTCANCERORG: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCRISIS INTERVENTION SERVICES DBA SIERRA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetExtrafood: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSANTA ROSA AREA SQUAD CLUB: $4,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetHomeward Bound of Marin: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Marin Community Services: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUTTER BAY HOSPITALS: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOVATO FIRE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Marin High School All Sports Booster Club: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetROOTS OF PEACE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Marin High School Music Boosters: $2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPOLLY KLAAS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLIDE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAMA'S KITCHEN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPARKLE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPICE MAUI INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGirls Leadership Institute Inc dba Girls Leadership: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA32.2× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Peter E Haas Jr Family Fund · The Springcreek Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Harbor Point Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Egide Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Egide Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Egide Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph