· Private foundation
Egg Foundation Dba Cameron Schrier Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $3k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $89k
- $50k–250k20 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+2 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UCSF FOUNDATION | $750,000 |
| HOWARD UNIVERSITY | $700,000 |
| OUTER COAST | $154,183 |
| LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES | $151,759 |
| PRINCETON UNIVERSITY (FBO PRINGLE RESEARCH IN GORONGOSA MOZAMBIQUE) | $150,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $150,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND JOHANNESBURG | $110,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100,000 |
| EQUAL EDUCATION LAW CENTRE TRUST | $100,000 |
| SOUTH AFRICA DEVELOPMENT FUND (FBO AFRICAN STORYBOOK AT SAIDE) | $100,000 |
| IMPACT FUND | $100,000 |
| LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN | $100,000 |
| READING PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $85,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $75,000 |
| MATRICULATE | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $685k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY3× · 2022–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +2%- OCOUTER COAST5× · 2020–2024 · $835k · revenue +150%
- LSLarkin Street Youth Services5× · 2020–2024 · $702k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- SASOUTH AFRICA DEVELOPMENT FUND (FBO SOUTHERN CENTRE FOR INEQUALITYSTUDIES ATone grant, 2023 · $110k
- SASOUTH AFRICA DEVELOPMENT FUND (FBO UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND)one grant, 2020 · $110k
- FAFINE ARTS MUSEUMS OF SAN FRANCISCO SARAH K DELSON ARTS FELLOWSHIPone grant, 2023 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…
At college prep we believe in the foundational importance of scholarship, the value of dialogue, and the need for academically curious young people to belong to a kind, creative, diverse and joyful community. we challenge our students to…
The immigration institute of the bay area helps immigrants, refugees, and their families join and contribute to the community.
At san franicisco university high school, we engage our community of diverse voices in a transformational experience that embraces the spirited pursuit of learning and empowers purpose larger than self.
UC Berkeley Center for Executive Education ("CEE") is a nonprofit public benefit corporation dedicated to promoting and advancing education through its executive education programs for corporate and institutional clients seeking continuing…
Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…
Our mission is to create inclusive, empowering, and college-preparatory experiences that equip students to succeed in college, career, and as leaders in their communities.
The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…
Build the parent and community demand for world-class public schools, and to accelerate the growth of these schools, particularly for low-income students, students of colors, and students with special needs.
For more than five decades, public advocates has challenged the systemic causes of poverty and racial discrimination by strengthening community voices in public policy and achieving tangible legal victories advancing education, housing,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Matriculate Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Society of Nephrology. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds OUTER COAST ↗
- Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
- Who funds MATRICULATE INC ↗
- Who funds The Impact Fund ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds READING PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PRINCETON IN AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto Inc ↗
- Who funds La Casa de las Madres ↗
- Who funds GRASSROOT SOCCER INC ↗
- Who funds The School for Ethics and Global Leadership ↗
- Who funds CatchLight ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL MENTORING PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY ↗
- Who funds 826 Valencia ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Wendell Family Foundation · Gates Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Egg Foundation Dba Cameron Schrier Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Egg Foundation Dba Cameron Schrier Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Egg Foundation Dba Cameron Schrier Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.