Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edwin W Norberg Char Tr Uw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$123kEducation$119kArts & Culture$52kHuman Services$34kPhilanthropy$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,624
Median grant
2
States reached
$982k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUGUSTANA LUTHERAN CHURCH$9,248
ST OLAF COLLEGE$5,549
AUGSBURG COLLEGE$4,624
MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION$4,624
EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH AMERICA$4,624
GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE$4,624
MOUNT OLIVET LUTHERAN CHURCH$4,277
MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC$2,312
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN ST PAUL$2,312
AUGUSTANA CARE$2,312
MOUNT OLIVET ROLLING ACRES$1,734
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MOUNT OLIVET ROLLING ACRES: $2k → 5%MOUNT OLIVET ROLLING ACRES: $3k → 11%MOUNT OLIVET ROLLING ACRES: $2k → 11%MOUNT OLIVET ROLLING ACRES: $2k → 11%MOUNT OLIVET ROLLING ACRES: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$327k · 12 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$327k
$5k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    ST OLAF COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +37%
  • AU
    AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +28%
  • MC
    MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $17k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • EL
    EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
2
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
3
Luther College

Founded by the norwegian evangelical lutheran church in 1861, luther college is a four-year, residential liberal arts institution. luther welcomes students of all backgrounds to engage in a way of learning that moves beyond immediate…

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
6
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
7
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
8
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
University of Minnesota Alumni Association

The university of minnesota alumni association (umaa) fosters a lifelong spirit of belonging and pride by connecting alumni, students, and friends to the university of minnesota and each other. the alumni association advocates for the…

—
11
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
12
University of Mary

The University of Mary exists to serve the religious, academic and cultural needs of the people in this region and beyond.(Continued on Schedule O)

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Olaf College; the most unlike its peers is Augustana Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AUGUSTANA LUTHERAN CHURCH: $68,267 · OtherAUGUSTANA LUTHERAN CHURCHMOUNT OLIVET LUTHERAN CHURCH: $33,430 · OtherMOUNT OLIVET LUTHERAN CHURCHEVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH AMERICA: $24,342 · OtherEVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH AMERICAAUGUSTANA CARE: $17,066 · OtherAUGUSTANA CARENORTHWESTERN FOUNDATION: $12,493 · OtherNORTHWESTERN FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $5,901 · Other+1 more: $4,855 · OtherST OLAF COLLEGE: $35,667 · EducationST OLAF COLLEGEGUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE: $34,742 · EducationGUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGEAUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $34,742 · EducationAUGSBURG UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL: $4,573 · EducationMINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $34,742 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA ORCHEST…MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC: $17,066 · Arts & CultureMACPHAIL CENTER F…MOUNT OLIVET ROLLING ACRES INC: $16,488 · Human Services
Other$166,354Education$109,724Arts & Culture$51,808Human Services$16,488

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST OLAF COLLEGE: $35,667 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE: $34,742 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $34,742 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $34,742 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC: $17,066 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTANA CARE: $17,066 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT OLIVET ROLLING ACRES INC: $16,488 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWESTERN FOUNDATION: $12,493 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL: $4,573 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST OLAF COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTANA CARE ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT OLIVET ROLLING ACRES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWESTERN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edwin W Norberg Char Tr Uw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edwin W Norberg Char Tr Uw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edwin W Norberg Char Tr Uw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph