Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward Whinnery Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$683kHuman Services$125kRecreation & Sports$51kFood & Nutrition$44kPhilanthropy$25kYouth Development$20kReligion$17kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $71k
$6,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DECATUR$70,500
UNITED WAY$25,000
SALVATION ARMY$7,500
DECATUR PARKS FOUNDATION$6,750
DECATUR AREA ARTS COUNCIL$5,000
PAWPRINT MINISTRIES$4,460
DECATUR FAMILY YMCA$3,000
MACON RESOURCES INC$1,885
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%DECATUR MACON COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATION: $20k → 15%DECATUR MACON COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATION: $10k → 15%DECATUR MACON COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATION: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$976k · 14 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$976k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+46%

Still filing today

36%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTHEAST COMMUNITY FUND
    6× · 2017–2022 · $44k · revenue +158%
  • DC
    DECATUR-MACON COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES CORP
    3× · 2019–2021 · $36k · revenue +11%
  • MR
    MACON RESOURCES INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • EO
    EMPOERMENT OPPORTUNITY CENTER (FORMERLY DMCOC)
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • DC
    DECATUR-MACON COUNTY SENIOR PROGRAM
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • SG
    Sista Girls and Friends Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Decatur Chamber of Commerce

Develop commerce in the city of decatur indiana

—
2
Decatur County Community Foundation Inc

The foundation encourages, prudently manages and distributes charitable contributions to improve the quality of life of decatur county residents, now and in the future.

Philanthropy
3
Decatur County United Fund Inc

To support social services in decatur county.

Philanthropy
4
Decatur County Chamber of Commerce

Business and tourism development for decatur county, tennessee

—
5
Decatur Area Senior Citizens Council Inc

Facility providing services and wellness for elderly in decatur and macon county, illinois

—
6
Decatur Cooperative Ministry Inc

Decatur cooperative ministry helps families facing homelessness settle into safe, stable homes and build healthy lives filled with peace, hope and opportunity.

—
7
Decatur Area Habitat

Provide housing for the needy

Housing & Shelter
8
Dmacc Foundation

Receive donations for dmacc.

Education
9
Decatur Area Convention & Visitors Bureau

To encourage, foster, promote and stimulate conventions and tourism in the decatur, illinois area.

—
10
Decorah Area Chamber of Commerce

Promoting specific commerical and industrial progress of community and surrounding area.

—
11
Dakota County Technical College Foundation

The dctc foundation's mission is to foster student success and elevate the academic experience at dakota county technical college by securing resources through strong partnerships with employers, alumni, and the community.

—
12
Economic Development Corp of Decatur-Macon County

To coordinate non-retail business attraction, retention, and expansion efforts in macon county, illinois.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Decatur-Macon County Opportunities Corp; the most unlike its peers is Sista Girls and Friends Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DECATUR: $618,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DECATURDOVE INC: $50,000 · OtherDOVE INCNORTHEAST COMMUNITY FUND: $44,000 · OtherDECATUR FAMILY YMCA: $41,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $37,010 · Other+10 more: $117,147 · Other+10 moreMACON RESOURCES INC: $28,764 · HealthMIDWEST SIGHT FOUNDATION NFP: $26,000 · HealthDECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $2,500 · HealthDECATUR-MACON COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES CORP: $36,000 · Human ServicesDECATUR PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $28,550 · Recreation & SportsSista Girls and Friends Inc: $3,600 · Youth DevelopmentTHE LITTLE THEATRE - ON THE SQUARE INC: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$908,157Health$57,264Human Services$36,000Recreation & Sports$28,550Youth Development$3,600Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHEAST COMMUNITY FUND: $44,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetDECATUR-MACON COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES CORP: $36,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMACON RESOURCES INC: $28,764 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDECATUR PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $28,550 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetDECATUR AREA ARTS COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSista Girls and Friends Inc: $3,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRICHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHEAST COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds DECATUR-MACON COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES CORP ↗
  • Who funds MACON RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds DECATUR PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST SIGHT FOUNDATION NFP ↗
  • Who funds DECATUR AREA ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Sista Girls and Friends Inc ↗
  • Who funds DECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds THE LITTLE THEATRE - ON THE SQUARE INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John Ullrich Foundation Trust Busey Trust Co - TrusteeIL26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John Ullrich Foundation Trust Busey Trust Co - Trustee · The Community Foundation of Macon County · Amherst F Hardy Foundation · Andreas Foundation · The Erwin and Linda Arends Foundation · James Millikin Trust A · Henry M Staley Declaration of Charit Tr D/B/A Staley Family Foundation · Ts & Juanita Ballance Foundation · United Way of Decatur and Mid Il · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward Whinnery Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward Whinnery Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edward Whinnery’s filings →

    More from the funding graph