Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward P Evans Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14M
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
21
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$46MEducation$30MScience & Tech$7.1MRecreation & Sports$590kYouth Development$350kArts & Culture$184kOther$0
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k24 grants · $3.6M
  • $250k+17 grants · $11M
$200,000
Median grant
21
States reached
$261M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$1,602,500
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$1,100,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$812,500
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$775,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$750,000
ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$687,500
COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY$680,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$677,500
BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$552,500
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$537,500
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER$437,500
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MT SINAI$437,500
THE MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL$400,000
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$365,000
OREGON HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY$250,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $3.1M → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $813k → 8%Prostate Cancer Foundation: $500k → 14%COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $680k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $438k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $750k → 17%ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $2.9M → 28%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTH WESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $525k → 14%MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $550k → 16%Washington University: $3.0M → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1.1M → 21%OREGON HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $475k → 12%YALE UNIVERSITY: $425k → 12%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $775k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $678k → 17%Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center: $474k → 16%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $440k → 14%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $1.6M → 16%Prostate Cancer Foundation: $500k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $503k → 17%ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $688k → 28%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $600k → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1.1M → 21%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY: $600k → 14%Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center: $450k → 16%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $1.4M → 16%Albert Einstein College of Medicine: $600k → 28%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $794k → 21%CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $450k → 16%Boston Children's Hospital: $975k → 16%ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $503k → 28%CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $438k → 16%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $935k → 16%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $538k → 17%ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $450k → 28%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $875k → 16%Columbia University in the City of New York: $2.7M → 17%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $750k → 16%Boston Children's Hospital: $725k → 16%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $600k → 16%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $1.8M → 17%BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $553k → 16%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $550k → 16%New York University: $550k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $450k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $2.9M → 17%THE MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $475k → 16%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MT SINAI: $438k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$72M · 49 repeat orgs$3.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
15

Total granted

$72M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+17%

Still filing today

47%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureScience & TechRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7.0M · revenue +16%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $4.8M · revenue +95%
  • NY
    New York University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Texas Health Science Center at San A
    one grant, 2021 · $350k
  • GH
    GENERAL HOSPITAL CORP
    one grant, 2023 · $300k
  • CS
    COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $225k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
7
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
8
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
9
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
10
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
11
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Chicago; the most unlike its peers is National Museum of Racing Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
27/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: $7,329,969 · OtherMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $5,295,853 · OtherALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINEDANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $3,888,424 · OtherDANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTEBoston Children's Hospital: $3,377,500 · OtherBoston Children's HospitalUniversity of Wisconsin - Madison: $1,600,000 · Other+44 more: $19,811,875 · Other+44 moreWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $7,048,699 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $6,973,324 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY I…New York University: $2,802,500 · EducationNew York UniversityTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $2,325,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND S…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $1,825,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTERICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $1,235,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $1,162,500 · EducationUniversity of Miami: $1,025,000 · EducationVanderbilt University: $962,500 · Education+7 more: $2,197,911 · Education+7 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $4,760,000 · HealthDana-Farber Canc…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $2,271,208 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPI…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,167,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN…Vanderbilt University Medical Center: $1,350,160 · HealthVanderbilt Unive…Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $775,000 · HealthFred Hutchinson …THE JACKSON LABORATORY: $600,000 · HealthPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 · PhilanthropyCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $730,000 · Science & TechNorthwestern University: $590,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL MUSEUM OF RACING INC: $184,487 · Arts & Culture
Other$41,303,621Education$27,557,434Health$11,923,868Philanthropy$2,000,000Science & Tech$730,000Recreation & Sports$590,000Arts & Culture$184,487

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $7,048,699 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $6,973,324 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $4,760,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNew York University: $2,802,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $2,325,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $2,271,208 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,167,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $1,825,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $1,350,160 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $1,235,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $1,162,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $1,025,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $962,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $775,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $730,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JACKSON LABORATORY: $600,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $600,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University: $590,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $550,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $541,102 over 5y, 53% of budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $375,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $297,911 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $225,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF RACING INC: $184,487 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY: $20,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetAPLASTIC ANEMIA & MDS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center ↗
  • Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds THE JACKSON LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward P Evans Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward P Evans Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Edward P Evans Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Edward P Evans Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edward P Evans’ filings →

More from the funding graph