Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward Love Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$194kHealth$120kFood & Nutrition$53kHousing & Shelter$39kEducation$27kCommunity Improvement$26kAnimals$13kPhilanthropy$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$603k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Santa Clothes Club$8,000
Salvation Army-Toy Town$5,000
Easter Seals Rehabilitation Center$3,000
Marian Educational Outreach$2,000
Tri State Food Bank$2,000
United Caring Shelters$1,500
Evansville Christian Life Center$1,500
Evansville Rescue Mission$1,500
Patchwork Central$1,500
St Vincent DePaul Foundation$1,500
Ark Inc$1,000
Chemo Buddies$500
EVSC Foundation$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%United Methodist Youth Home: $500 → 15%EVANSVILLE CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER: $5k → 15%EVANSVILLE CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER: $3k → 15%EVANSVILLE CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER: $3k → 15%Evansville Christian Life Center: $2k → 15%EVANSVILLE CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER: $2k → 15%EVANSVILLE CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER: $2k → 15%Evansville Christian Life Center: $2k → 15%EVANSVILLE CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER: $2k → 15%EVANSVILLE CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER: $1k → 15%EVANSVILLE ARC: $4k → 15%ARC OF EVANSVILLE: $3k → 15%EVANSVILLE ARC: $2k → 15%ARC OF EVANSVILLE: $2k → 15%AURORA INC: $1k → 15%AURORA INC: $1k → 15%Aurora: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$483k · 27 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
11

Total granted

$483k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+14%

Still filing today

56%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    TRI-STATE FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $49k · revenue +176%
  • AF
    ALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +33%
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF EVANSVILLE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $26k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • SV
    ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Evansville Christian School Inc

Evansville christian school exists to empower students to embrace a biblical worldview through spiritual and academic growth, servant leadership, and authentic relationships in the name of jesus christ.

—
2
Meals on Wheels of Evansville Inc
Food & Nutrition
3
Evansville Regional Economic Partnership Foundation

Promote business growth and activities in evansville, indiana.

—
4
District of Evansville of the Society of

Inspired by gospel values, a catholic lay organization, leads women and men to join together to grow spiritually by offering person-to-person service to those who are needy and suffering in the tradition of its founder, blessed frederic…

Human Services
5
Easter Seals Tristate

Empowering children and adults with disabilities, military veterans, and people facing disadvantages to live full and meaningful lives.

Employment
6
Catholic Charities Terre Haute Inc

Catholic Charities Terre Haute is a comprehensive, direct services agency whose purpose is to serve the poor, the homeless, the elderly, the neglected children and the needy.

—
7
For Evansville Inc

We believe citywide flourishing happens when every person in the city flourishes, and we pursue the flourishing of every person by bringing people together to solve our citys (Evansville, IN) most pressing needs.

Religion
8
Evansville Association for the Blind Inc

The evansville association for the blind, inc. is a not-for-profit organization committed to assisting disabled or disadvantaged persons, particularly the visually impaired, empowering them through diverse services to live and work in the…

Human Services
9
Catholic Charities Bloomington Inc

Catholic Charities Bloomington is committed to enhancing the availability of quality mental health services in the communities it serves. We do this through the delivery of professional mental health education and counseling on a sliding…

—
10
Evansville Sports Corporation

To help enhance southwestern indiana's culture, image, economy & quality of life through the attraction, promotion and development of family oriented and national sporting events.

Community Improvement
11
Evanston Animal Shelter Association

The evanston animal shelter and adoption center gives companion animals the best chance at the life they deserve through rehabilitation, foster care, adoption and community support that keeps pets with the people who love them.

Animals
12
Hope of Evansville Inc

To provide counseling and assisstance with housing needs for clients located in the evansville, in area under guidelines established by the housing and urban development provisions.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evsc Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Santa Clothes Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
10/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Santa Clothes Club Inc: $83,000 · OtherSanta Clothes Club IncSALVATION ARMY-TOY TOWN: $53,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMY-TOY TOWNTRI-STATE FOOD BANK: $49,000 · OtherTRI-STATE FOOD BANKROTARY CLUB OF EVANSVILLE: $25,600 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF EVANSVILLETRI STATE MULITIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSN: $21,000 · OtherTRI STATE MULITIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSNEVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC: $18,500 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAUL FOUNDATION: $15,500 · OtherCATHOLIC FOUNDATION: $14,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherMARION EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH: $14,000 · Other+15 more: $51,600 · Other+15 moreEASTER SEALS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $46,000 · HealthEASTER SEALS R…CHEMO BUDDIES: $11,000 · HealthCHEMO BUDDIESTRI-STATE MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSN: $4,000 · HealthTRI-STATE MULT…ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · Health+1 more: $1,500 · HealthALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC: $27,500 · Human ServicesALBION FELLOW…EVANSVILLE CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesEVANSVILLE CH…EVANSVILLE ARC INC: $10,850 · Human ServicesEVANSVILLE AR…AURORA INC: $3,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesUnited Caring Shelters Inc: $17,500 · Housing & ShelterCATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION DIOCESE OF EVANSVILLE INC: $2,500 · EducationEVSC FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$360,200Health$65,500Human Services$59,850Housing & Shelter$17,500Education$2,500Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSanta Clothes Club Inc: $83,000 over 9y, 5.8% of budgetTRI-STATE FOOD BANK: $49,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEASTER SEALS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $46,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC: $27,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetEVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC: $18,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEVANSVILLE CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER INC: $18,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetUnited Caring Shelters Inc: $17,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetCHEMO BUDDIES: $11,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetEVANSVILLE ARC INC: $10,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARIAN EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH: $4,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTRI-STATE MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSN: $4,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetAURORA INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION DIOCESE OF EVANSVILLE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPatchwork Central Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEVSC FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Methodist Youth Home Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Santa Clothes Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRI-STATE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF EVANSVILLE ↗
  • Who funds EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds EVANSVILLE CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds United Caring Shelters Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHEMO BUDDIES ↗
  • Who funds EVANSVILLE ARC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF SOUTHWESTERN INDIANAINC ↗
  • Who funds MARIAN EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds TRI-STATE MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds AURORA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION DIOCESE OF EVANSVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Patchwork Central Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds EVSC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds United Methodist Youth Home Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation IncIN34.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · Koch Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · West Side Nut Club Inc · Holiday Management Foundation · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Gerling Family Foundation Inc · Evansville Endowment Fund Inc · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · James R Duncan Trust Uw Fifth Third · Braun Family Foundation Inc co Jim Burger ONB Trust Co

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward Love Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward Love Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edward Love’s filings →

    More from the funding graph