Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward J Okray Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$285k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$614kYouth Development$562kHealth$416kHuman Services$249kArts & Culture$194kInternational$182kRecreation & Sports$118kEducation$85kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FARMING FOR THE FUTURE FOUNDATION I$100,000
MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOU$40,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE COUNTY$25,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSN OF GREATER WI$15,000
MYTEAM TRIUMPH WISCONSIN INC$15,000
STEVENS POINT AREA YMCA$10,000
WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO$10,000
FRIENDS OF WISCONSIN PUBLIC TELEVIS$10,000
CREATE PORTAGE COUNTY INC$9,000
OPERATION BOOTSTRAP$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF THE NWGL INC$5,000
UNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC$5,000
CELEBRATE PLOVER FOUNDATION INC$5,000
EASTERSEALS WISCONSIN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $89k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MYTEAM TRIUMPH WISCONSIN INC: $15k → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $10k → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $10k → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $10k → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $10k → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $10k → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $10k → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $5k → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $5k → 10%OPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 40 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
12

Total granted

$2.4M
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+9%

Still filing today

53%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FARMING FOR THE FUTURE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $566k · revenue +291%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $426k · revenue +117%
  • OB
    OPERATION BOOTSTRAP
    9× · 2017–2025 · $74k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MICHAEL'S FOUNDATION OF STEVENS
    one grant, 2018 · $65k
  • NC
    NONPROFIT CENTER OF CENTRAL WISCONS
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • WP
    WISCONSINEYE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue -55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
2
The Portage Foundation

The portage foundation inspires, impacts, and engages the portage county community by ensuring pathways of enduring support to meet local needs. we are committed to integrity and accountability in connecting donors with recipients,…

—
3
Wisconsin Progress Inc

Wisconsin progress recruits, trains, elects, and develops progressive candidates and leaders at the local and state legislative levels.

Civil Rights
4
Wisconsin Progress Institute Inc

Wisconsin progress institute exists to empower wisconsin's locally elected leaders with the tools, training, and support they need to be effective, values-driven public servants.

Education
5
Wisconsin Public Broadcasting Foundation Inc

The Wisconsin Public Broadcasting Foundation WPBF supports the work of the Educational Communications Board ECB a State of Wisconsin agency committed to ensuring that public media and public safety programs and services are available…

Arts & Culture
6
Wisconsin Rural Opportunities Inc

To foster the vitality of rural wisconsin, primarily through the promotion of education, improvement of health care services, cultural experiences, and support of the rural economic base.

—
7
Wisconsin Philanthropy Network Inc

To promote effective philanthropy in wi through education, best practices, enhanced partnerships & leadership

—
8
Portage Development Board

To coordinate and promote economic development on a county wide basis among all of the political subdivisions of portage county, ohio.

Public Benefit
9
Wisconsin Agricultural Education Center Inc

To educate visitors of all ages about how and where their food is produced and why agriculture is so important to them.

Arts & Culture
10
Wisconsin Principles Inc

Wisconsin principles (wp) is a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization dedicated to preserving conservative values in the state of wisconsin. committed to fiscal conservatism, educational choice, and individual liberty, we strive to empower…

Civil Rights
11
Pharmacy Society of Wisconsin Inc

Provide a unified voice, resources, and leadership to advance the pharmacy profession and improve the quality of medication use in wisconsin.

—
12
One Wisconsin Now Inc

To advance progressive values, ideas and policies through research, policy, networking, advocacy and public education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Farming for the Future Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOU: $220,000 · OtherMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUASPIRUS STEVENS POINT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $177,000 · OtherASPIRUS STEVENS POINT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCSTEVENS POINT AREA YMCA: $115,000 · OtherSTEVENS POINT AREA YMCAALZHEIMER'S ASSN OF GREATER WI: $80,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSN OF GREATER WIST MICHAEL'S FOUNDATION OF STEVENS: $65,000 · OtherST MICHAEL'S FOUNDATION OF STEVENSSALVATION ARMY: $55,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF WISCONSIN PUBLIC TELEVIS: $50,000 · OtherCAP SERVICES INC - FAMILY CRISIS CE: $50,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF THE NWGL INC: $42,000 · Other+29 more: $347,000 · Other+29 moreFARMING FOR THE FUTURE FOUNDATION: $566,000 · PhilanthropyFARMING FOR THE FUTURE FOU…CELEBRATE PLOVER FOUNDATION INC: $41,000 · PhilanthropyCELEBRATE PLOVER FOUNDATIO…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE: $426,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF…THE WISCONSIN FFA FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 · Youth Development+2 more: $16,200 · Youth DevelopmentWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL WISCONSIN CHILDRENS MUSEUM INC: $48,000 · Arts & CultureCREATE PORTAGE COUNTY INC: $19,000 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL WISCONSIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureWISCONSINEYE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK INC: $8,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureOPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $74,000 · Human ServicesMYTEAM TRIUMPH WISCONSIN INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesINTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC: $36,000 · Food & NutritionTHE CENTRAL RIVERS FARMSHED INC: $7,000 · Food & NutritionSTEVENS POINT CURLING CLUB INC: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,201,000Philanthropy$607,000Youth Development$464,200Arts & Culture$136,000Human Services$89,000Food & Nutrition$43,000Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFARMING FOR THE FUTURE FOUNDATION: $566,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE: $426,000 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetASPIRUS STEVENS POINT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $177,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetOPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $74,000 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL WISCONSIN CHILDRENS MUSEUM INC: $48,000 over 9y, 7.0% of budgetCELEBRATE PLOVER FOUNDATION INC: $41,000 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetINTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC: $36,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetTHE SCHOOL AT ALTENBURGS FARM INC: $31,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC: $29,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPORTAGE COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $28,500 over 9y, 8.6% of budgetTHE WISCONSIN FFA FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCREATE PORTAGE COUNTY INC: $19,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetWISCONSIN 4-H FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $14,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetSTEVENS POINT CURLING CLUB INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetCENTRAL WISCONSIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $9,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSINEYE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTRAL RIVERS FARMSHED INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetRAWHIDE INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEVENS POINT CHILD SAFETY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetEASTER SEALS WISCONSIN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPORTAGE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FARMING FOR THE FUTURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRUS STEVENS POINT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION BOOTSTRAP ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL WISCONSIN CHILDRENS MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds CELEBRATE PLOVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SCHOOL AT ALTENBURGS FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTAGE COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WISCONSIN FFA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATE PORTAGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MYTEAM TRIUMPH WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN 4-H FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds STEVENS POINT CURLING CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL WISCONSIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSINEYE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTRAL RIVERS FARMSHED INC ↗
  • Who funds RAWHIDE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Central Wisconsin IncWI45.2× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Central Wisconsin Inc · Sentry Insurance Foundation Inc · Delta Dental of Wisconsin Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Noel Family Foundation Inc · Seramur Family Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · McPartland Family Foundation Inc · Peters Family Foundation Inc · Paper City Savings Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward J Okray Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward J Okray Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edward J Okray’s filings →

    More from the funding graph