Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward & Thea Lawton Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$211k
Granted FY2026still arriving
21
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$481kHealth$189kEducation$118kReligion$52kInternational$40kEmployment$30kArts & Culture$29kCivil Rights$25kOther$0
02FY2026 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k19 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROWN CENTER FOR SENIOR LIVING$150,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
HIAS$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
ST LOUIS PUBLIC RADIO$4,000
LAUGHING BEAR BAKERY$3,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$3,000
LUPUS FOUNDATION$3,000
NAMI OF MISSOURI$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
MIRIAM SCHOOL$2,000
PETER AND PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES$1,000
BACKSTOPPERS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%LAUGHING BEAR BAKERY: $20k → 21%JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%LAUGHING BEAR BAKERY: $2k → 21%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP: $1k → 11%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP: $1k → 11%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP: $1k → 11%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP: $1k → 11%LAUGHING BEAR BAKERY: $3k → 21%LAUGHING BEAR BAKERY: $3k → 21%LAUGHING BEAR BAKERY: $3k → 21%LAUGHING BEAR BAKERY: $2k → 21%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $3k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $3k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
NY
CA
MO
MD
TN
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 65 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

65 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2026, 45 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

65
17

Total granted

$1.2M
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+63%

Still filing today

43%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CROWN CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2026 · $308k · revenue +151%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    5× · 2022–2026 · $25k · revenue +13%
  • NO
    NAMI OF MISSOURI
    10× · 2017–2026 · $20k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2025 · $5k
  • SL
    ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sts Joachim and Ann Care Service

To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…

—
2
Saint Louis Counseling Inc

The mission of saint louis counseling is to bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate caring presence. the purpose of saint louis counseling is "guided by the teachings of jesus christ, saint…

—
3
St Louis Crisis Nursery

Provide temporary care and shelter to children confronted with various life crises and to offer emergency support and community referrals to family members.

—
4
Child Center-Marygrove

Providing a safe home, compassionate care and high-quality mental health services to children and youth who have experienced significant trauma, to restore their childhood and equip them to productive adulthood.

Health
5
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
6
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
7
Jewish Federation of St Louis

Jewish federation of st. louis mobilizes the jewish community and its human and financial resources to preserve and enhance jewish life in st. louis, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
8
The St Louis Children's Choirs

Transforming lives through musical excellence. the goal of the st. louis children's choirs is to empower the youth of st. louis through a rich choral program that helps each young singer realize their full potential - as a musician and as…

—
9
Nazareth Living Center

In the tradition of the sisters of st. joseph of carondelet and in partnership with benedictine, nazareth living center participates in the healing ministry of jesus ministering with compassion and responding creatively to the needs of…

Health
10
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
11
Magdala House

To provide outpatient and residential rehabilitative services to individuals and families referred by various government agencies. these individuals include substance abusers, intellectually disabled, developmentally disabled, and abused…

Health
12
St Louis Jewish Light

The st. louis jewish light is a non-profit, independent news source whose mission is to inform, inspire, educate, and connect the st. louis jewish community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Services of St Louis; the most unlike its peers is Shriners Hospital for Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
27/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $135,200 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATIONPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $65,100 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODIndividual grant recipient: $46,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEWISH FEDERATION: $45,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONMIRIAM SCHOOL: $41,000 · OtherMIRIAM SCHOOLGOLDFARB SCHOOL OF NURSING AT BARNES JEWISH COLLEGE: $30,000 · OtherCONGREGATION TEMPLE ISRAEL: $27,000 · OtherLUPUS FOUNDATION: $27,000 · OtherCENTRAL REFORM CONGREGATION: $25,200 · Other+53 more: $253,350 · Other+53 moreTHE CROWN CENTER INC: $308,150 · Housing & ShelterTHE CROWN CENTER INC+1 more: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterLAUGHING BEAR BAKERY: $33,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS: $12,100 · Human ServicesTHE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Human ServicesBETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesNAMI OF MISSOURI: $20,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $11,100 · HealthGATEWAY TO HOPE: $5,100 · HealthCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $4,000 · HealthJAMAA BIRTH VILLAGE: $4,000 · HealthVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC: $3,000 · HealthMEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS: $3,000 · HealthHIAS INC: $25,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25,000 · InternationalCENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $11,000 · EducationREADY READERS: $11,000 · EducationWOMEN'S VOICES RAISED FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE: $8,000 · EducationHOME WORKS - THVP: $4,000 · EducationHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropySHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $9,000 · PhilanthropyJonah Maccabee Foundation Inc: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$694,850Housing & Shelter$314,150Human Services$57,100Health$50,200International$50,000Education$34,000Philanthropy$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CROWN CENTER INC: $308,150 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetLAUGHING BEAR BAKERY: $33,000 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI OF MISSOURI: $20,000 over 10y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS: $12,100 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $11,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetREADY READERS: $11,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS: $10,600 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $10,000 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $9,000 over 7y, 31% of budgetSHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S VOICES RAISED FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE: $8,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetTHE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAY TO HOPE: $5,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOME WORKS - THVP: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJAMAA BIRTH VILLAGE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMANASSEH MINISTRY: $3,750 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJonah Maccabee Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTRIPLE A YOUTH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCLIMATE RIDE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CROWN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LAUGHING BEAR BAKERY ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF ↗
  • Who funds READY READERS ↗
  • Who funds THE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S VOICES RAISED FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds THE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds PETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO47.7× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation · Jewish Federation of St Louis · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Edward Jones Foundation · Centene Foundation · Millstone Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward & Thea Lawton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward & Thea Lawton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Edward & Thea Lawton Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Edward & Thea Lawton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edward & Thea Lawton’s filings →

More from the funding graph