Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward & Hildegarde Schaefer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$97k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$155kHealth$132kArts & Culture$91kEnvironment$86kAnimals$57kFood & Nutrition$53kReligion$48kEducation$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WELLS COUNTY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$10,000
FORT WAYNE PHILHARMONIC$10,000
COMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK$8,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FORT WAYNE$6,250
ANIMAL RESCUE FUND$5,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$5,000
WELLS COUNTY FOUNDATION$5,000
FORT WAYNE CHILDREN'S ZOO$5,000
ACRES LAND TRUST$5,000
YWCA NORTHEAST INDIANA$5,000
MATTHEW 25 HEALTH CLINIC$5,000
TURNSTONE$4,000
NATIONAL AQUARIUM$4,000
SISTERS OF PROVIDENCE$3,000
SCIENCE CENTRAL$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%BRIDGE OF GRACE: $3k → 12%BRIDGE OF GRACE: $3k → 12%BRIDGE OF GRACE: $3k → 12%BRIDGE OF GRACE: $3k → 12%BRIDGE OF GRACE: $3k → 12%BRIDGE OF GRACE: $3k → 12%YWCA NORTHEAST INDIANA: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$682k · 23 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
3

Total granted

$682k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+9%

Still filing today

61%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WELLS COMMUNITY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    9× · 2017–2025 · $73k · revenue +98%
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +21%
  • M2
    MATTHEW 25 INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $49k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • LN
    LC NATURE PARK INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +9%
  • Y
    YMCA
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
2
The Adirondack Council Inc

The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…

Environment
3
Kalamazoo Nature Center

Create relationships & experiences that welcome and inspire people to discover, enjoy, value, and care for nature. Kalamazoo Nature Center envisions a resilient community where all people have strong interconnections with the natural world.

Environment
4
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
5
Buffalo Audubon Society Inc

Buffalo audubon society leads and inspires western new yorkers to connect with and protect the natural world through bird-focused activities, advocacy and habitat restoration.

Environment
6
International Center for the Preservation of Wild Animals Inc

The wilds is a conservation center and safari park operating as a not-for-profit 501(c)3 organization on nearly 10,000-acres in southeastern ohio. the wilds specializes in high-quality recreational opportunities that focus on connecting…

Animals
7
Central Indiana Land Trust Incorporated

The central indiana land trust, inc. preserves the best of central indiana's natural areas, protecting plants and animals, so hoosiers can experience the wonder of the state's natural heritage.

Environment
8
Blue Ridge Wildlife Center

The organization rescues, provides veterinary care, and rehabilitates injured, orphaned, and sick native wildlife with the goal of releasing them back into the wild. the organization monitors and controls wildlife disease and environmental…

Philanthropy
9
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
10
Sycamore Land Trust Incorporated

To preserve the beauty, health, and diversity of southern indiana's natural landscape through strategic land conservation and environmental education.

Environment
11
Red-Tail Land Conservancy Inc

Red-tail land conservancy preserves, protects, and restores natural areas and farm land in east central indiana while increasing awareness of our natural heritage.

Environment
12
Zoological Society of Buffalo Inc

Building community; creating connections; saving wildlife through a collaboration for change: the buffalo zoo will be a center of conservation excellence, providing leadership to secure a future where wildlife thrives. we embody our…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turnstone Center for Children & Adults With Disabilities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Science Central Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FORT WAYNE PHILHARMONIC: $91,000 · OtherFORT WAYNE PHILHARMONICBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA: $33,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIAN…NATIONAL AQUARIUM: $28,000 · OtherNATIONAL AQUARIUMTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $27,600 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYSISTERS OF PROVIDENCE OF SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS: $25,000 · OtherSISTERS OF PROVIDENCE OF SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODSWELLSPRING: $22,500 · OtherWELLSPRINGBRIDGE OF GRACE COMPASSIONATE MINISTRIES CENTER INC: $18,000 · OtherBRIDGE OF GRACE COMPASSIONATE MINISTRIES CENTER …SCIENCE CENTRAL INC: $19,300 · OtherSCIENCE CENTRAL INC+9 more: $48,718 · Other+9 moreMATTHEW 25 INC: $49,000 · HealthMATTHEW 25 INCHEALTHIER MOMS AND BABIES INC: $42,750 · HealthHEALTHIER MOMS AND B…TURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES INC: $40,600 · HealthTURNSTONE CENTER FOR…WELLS COMMUNITY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $72,800 · Youth DevelopmentWELLS COMMUNITY BO…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND: $49,350 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS…COMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $53,400 · Food & NutritionACRES Inc: $46,500 · EnvironmentUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $18,750 · EducationBEREA COLLEGE: $10,500 · EducationWELLS COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationFORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $20,000 · AnimalsANIMAL RESCUE FUND INC: $5,000 · AnimalsPROFESSIONAL ANIMAL RETIREMENT CENTER INC: $4,000 · AnimalsLC NATURE PARK INC: $2,500 · Animals
Other$313,118Health$132,350Youth Development$122,150Food & Nutrition$53,400Environment$46,500Education$39,250Animals$31,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWELLS COMMUNITY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $72,800 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $53,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND: $49,350 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMATTHEW 25 INC: $49,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetACRES Inc: $46,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetHEALTHIER MOMS AND BABIES INC: $42,750 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetTURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES INC: $40,600 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA: $33,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $27,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSCIENCE CENTRAL INC: $19,300 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $18,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE OF GRACE COMPASSIONATE MINISTRIES CENTER INC: $18,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetBEREA COLLEGE: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWELLS COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROFESSIONAL ANIMAL RETIREMENT CENTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLC NATURE PARK INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WELLS COMMUNITY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND ↗
  • Who funds MATTHEW 25 INC ↗
  • Who funds ACRES Inc ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHIER MOMS AND BABIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCE CENTRAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE OF GRACE COMPASSIONATE MINISTRIES CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WELLS COUNTY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YWCA NORTHEAST INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PROFESSIONAL ANIMAL RETIREMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LC NATURE PARK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The James Foundation IncIN28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The James Foundation Inc · McMillen Foundation Inc · Edward M Wilson Foundation · English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · M E Raker Foundation Inc · The Waterfield Foundation Inc · Aws Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Edward D & Ione Auer Foundation Monarch Capital David Meyer Trustee · Zollner Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward & Hildegarde Schaefer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward & Hildegarde Schaefer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Edward & Hildegarde Schaefer Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Edward & Hildegarde Schaefer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edward & Hildegarde Schaefer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph